## Summary
- Tightens Plan Mode to encourage exploration-first behavior and more
back-and-forth alignment.
- Adds a required TL;DR checkpoint before drafting the full plan.
- Clarifies client behavior that can cause premature “Implement this
plan?” prompts.
## What changed
- Require at least one targeted non-mutating exploration pass before the
first user question.
- Insert a TL;DR checkpoint between Phase 2 (intent) and Phase 3
(implementation).
- TL;DR checkpoint guidance:
- Label: “Proposed Plan (TL;DR)”
- Format: 3–5 bullets using `- `
- Options: exactly one option, “Approve”
- `isOther: true`, with explicit guidance that “None of the above” is
the edit path in the current UI.
- Require the final plan to include a TL;DR consistent with the approved
checkpoint.
## Why
- In Plan Mode, any normal assistant message at turn completion is
treated as plan content by the client. This can trigger premature
“Implement this plan?” prompts.
- The TL;DR checkpoint aligns on direction before Codex drafts a long,
decision-complete plan.
## Testing
- Manual: built the local CLI and verified the flow now explores first,
presents a TL;DR checkpoint, and only drafts the full plan after
approval.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nick Baumann <@openai.com>
`requirements.toml` should be able to specify rules which always run.
My intention here was that these rules could only ever be restrictive,
which means the decision can be "prompt" or "forbidden" but never
"allow". A requirement of "you must always allow this command" didn't
make sense to me, but happy to be gaveled otherwise.
Rules already applies the most restrictive decision, so we can safely
merge these with rules found in other config folders.
Previously, `CodexAuth` was defined as follows:
d550fbf41a/codex-rs/core/src/auth.rs (L39-L46)
But if you looked at its constructors, we had creation for
`AuthMode::ApiKey` where `storage` was built using a nonsensical path
(`PathBuf::new()`) and `auth_dot_json` was `None`:
d550fbf41a/codex-rs/core/src/auth.rs (L212-L220)
By comparison, when `AuthMode::ChatGPT` was used, `api_key` was always
`None`:
d550fbf41a/codex-rs/core/src/auth.rs (L665-L671)https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/10012 took things further because
it introduced a new `ChatgptAuthTokens` variant to `AuthMode`, which is
important in when invoking `account/login/start` via the app server, but
most logic _internal_ to the app server should just reason about two
`AuthMode` variants: `ApiKey` and `ChatGPT`.
This PR tries to clean things up as follows:
- `LoginAccountParams` and `AuthMode` in `codex-rs/app-server-protocol/`
both continue to have the `ChatgptAuthTokens` variant, though it is used
exclusively for the on-the-wire messaging.
- `codex-rs/core/src/auth.rs` now has its own `AuthMode` enum, which
only has two variants: `ApiKey` and `ChatGPT`.
- `CodexAuth` has been changed from a struct to an enum. It is a
disjoint union where each variant (`ApiKey`, `ChatGpt`, and
`ChatGptAuthTokens`) have only the associated fields that make sense for
that variant.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/10208).
* #10224
* __->__ #10208
Load requirements from Codex Backend. It only does this for enterprise
customers signed in with ChatGPT.
Todo in follow-up PRs:
* Add to app-server and exec too
* Switch from fail-open to fail-closed on failure
Session renaming:
- `/rename my_session`
- `/rename` without arg and passing an argument in `customViewPrompt`
- AppExitInfo shows resume hint using the session name if set instead of
uuid, defaults to uuid if not set
- Names are stored in `CODEX_HOME/sessions.jsonl`
Session resuming:
- codex resume <name> lookup for `CODEX_HOME/sessions.jsonl` first entry
matching the name and resumes the session
---------
Co-authored-by: jif-oai <jif@openai.com>
## Summary
- add startup tooltip for OpenAI community Discord
- add startup tooltip for Codex community forum
## Testing
- not run (text-only tooltip change)
## Summary
Let's dial in this api contract in a bit more with more robust fallback
behavior when model_instructions_template is false.
Switches to a more explicit template / variables structure, with more
fallbacks.
## Testing
- [x] Adding unit tests
- [x] Tested locally
