#15999 introduced a Windows-only `\r\n` mismatch in review-exit template
handling. This PR normalizes those template newlines and separates that
fix from [#16014](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/16014) so it can
be reviewed independently.
## Why
This continues the `codex-tools` migration by moving one more piece of
generic tool-definition bookkeeping out of `codex-core`.
The earlier extraction steps moved shared schema parsing into
`codex-tools`, but `core/src/tools/spec.rs` still had to supply tool
names separately and perform ad hoc rewrites for deferred MCP aliases.
That meant the crate boundary was still awkward: the parsed shape coming
back from `codex-tools` was missing part of the definition that
`codex-core` ultimately needs to assemble a `ResponsesApiTool`.
This change introduces a named `ToolDefinition` in `codex-tools` so both
MCP tools and dynamic tools cross the crate boundary in the same
reusable model. `codex-core` still owns the final `ResponsesApiTool`
assembly, but less of the generic tool-definition shaping logic stays
behind in `core`.
## What changed
- replaced `ParsedToolDefinition` with a named `ToolDefinition` in
`codex-rs/tools/src/tool_definition.rs`
- added `codex-rs/tools/src/tool_definition_tests.rs` for `renamed()`
and `into_deferred()`
- updated `parse_dynamic_tool()` and `parse_mcp_tool()` to return
`ToolDefinition`
- simplified `codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec.rs` so it adapts
`ToolDefinition` into `ResponsesApiTool` instead of rewriting names and
deferred fields inline
- updated parser tests and `codex-rs/tools/README.md` to reflect the
named tool-definition model
## Test plan
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::spec::`
## Why
`bazel.yml` already builds and tests the Bazel graph, but `rust-ci.yml`
still runs `cargo clippy` separately. This PR starts the transition to a
Bazel-backed lint lane for `codex-rs` so we can eventually replace the
duplicate Rust build, test, and lint work with Bazel while explicitly
keeping the V8 Bazel path out of scope for now.
To make that lane practical, the workflow also needs to look like the
Bazel job we already trust. That means sharing the common Bazel setup
and invocation logic instead of hand-copying it, and covering the arm64
macOS path in addition to Linux.
Landing the workflow green also required fixing the first lint findings
that Bazel surfaced and adding the matching local entrypoint.
## What changed
- add a reusable `build:clippy` config to `.bazelrc` and export
`codex-rs/clippy.toml` from `codex-rs/BUILD.bazel` so Bazel can run the
repository's existing Clippy policy
- add `just bazel-clippy` so the local developer entrypoint matches the
new CI lane
- extend `.github/workflows/bazel.yml` with a dedicated Bazel clippy job
for `codex-rs`, scoped to `//codex-rs/... -//codex-rs/v8-poc:all`
- run that clippy job on Linux x64 and arm64 macOS
- factor the shared Bazel workflow setup into
`.github/actions/setup-bazel-ci/action.yml` and the shared Bazel
invocation logic into `.github/scripts/run-bazel-ci.sh` so the clippy
and build/test jobs stay aligned
- fix the first Bazel-clippy findings needed to keep the lane green,
including the cross-target `cmsghdr::cmsg_len` normalization in
`codex-rs/shell-escalation/src/unix/socket.rs` and the no-`voice-input`
dead-code warnings in `codex-rs/tui` and `codex-rs/tui_app_server`
## Verification
- `just bazel-clippy`
- `RUNNER_OS=macOS ./.github/scripts/run-bazel-ci.sh -- build
--config=clippy --build_metadata=COMMIT_SHA=local-check
--build_metadata=TAG_job=clippy -- //codex-rs/...
-//codex-rs/v8-poc:all`
- `bazel build --config=clippy
//codex-rs/shell-escalation:shell-escalation`
- `CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/codex4-shell-escalation-test cargo test -p
codex-shell-escalation`
- `ruby -e 'require "yaml";
YAML.load_file(".github/workflows/bazel.yml");
YAML.load_file(".github/actions/setup-bazel-ci/action.yml")'`
## Notes
- `CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/codex4-tui-app-server-test cargo test -p
codex-tui-app-server` still hits existing guardian-approvals test and
snapshot failures unrelated to this PR's Bazel-clippy changes.
Related: #15954
## Why
`codex-tools` already owned the shared JSON schema parser and the MCP
tool schema adapter, but `core/src/tools/spec.rs` still parsed dynamic
tools directly.
That left the tool-schema boundary split in two different ways:
- MCP tools flowed through `codex-tools`, while dynamic tools were still
parsed in `codex-core`
- the extracted dynamic-tool path initially introduced a
dynamic-specific parsed shape even though `codex-tools` already had very
similar MCP adapter output
This change finishes that extraction boundary in one step. `codex-core`
still owns `ResponsesApiTool` assembly, but both MCP tools and dynamic
tools now enter that layer through `codex-tools` using the same parsed
tool-definition shape.
## What changed
- added `tools/src/dynamic_tool.rs` and sibling
`tools/src/dynamic_tool_tests.rs`
- introduced `parse_dynamic_tool()` in `codex-tools` and switched
`core/src/tools/spec.rs` to use it for dynamic tools
- added `tools/src/parsed_tool_definition.rs` so both MCP and dynamic
adapters return the same `ParsedToolDefinition`
- updated `core/src/tools/spec.rs` to build `ResponsesApiTool` through a
shared local adapter helper instead of separate MCP and dynamic assembly
paths
- expanded `core/src/tools/spec_tests.rs` so the dynamic-tool adapter
test asserts the full converted `ResponsesApiTool`, including
`defer_loading`
- updated `codex-rs/tools/README.md` to reflect the shared parsed
tool-definition boundary
## Test plan
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::spec::`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/15944).
* #15953
* __->__ #15944
## Summary
- split the joined `PATH` before running system `bwrap` lookup
- keep the existing workspace-local `bwrap` skip behavior intact
- add regression tests that exercise real multi-entry search paths
## Why
The PATH-based lookup added in #15791 still wrapped the raw `PATH`
environment value as a single `PathBuf` before passing it through
`join_paths()`. On Unix, a normal multi-entry `PATH` contains `:`, so
that wrapper path is invalid as one path element and the lookup returns
`None`.
That made Codex behave as if no system `bwrap` was installed even when
`bwrap` was available on `PATH`, which is what users in #15340 were
still hitting on `0.117.0-alpha.25`.
## Impact
System `bwrap` discovery now works with normal multi-entry `PATH` values
instead of silently falling back to the vendored binary.
Fixes#15340.
## Validation
- `just fmt`
- `cargo test -p codex-sandboxing`
- `cargo test -p codex-linux-sandbox`
- `just fix -p codex-sandboxing`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
## Why
`codex-utils-pty` and `codex-windows-sandbox` were the remaining crates
in `codex-rs` that still overrode the workspace's Rust 2024 edition.
Moving them forward in a separate PR keeps the baseline edition update
isolated from the follow-on Bazel clippy workflow in #15955, while
making linting and formatting behavior consistent with the rest of the
workspace.
This PR also needs Cargo and Bazel to agree on the edition for
`codex-windows-sandbox`. Without the Bazel-side sync, the experimental
Bazel app-server builds fail once they compile `windows-sandbox-rs`.
## What changed
- switch `codex-rs/utils/pty` and `codex-rs/windows-sandbox-rs` to
`edition = "2024"`
- update `codex-utils-pty` callsites and tests to use the collapsed `if
let` form that Clippy expects under the new edition
- fix the Rust 2024 fallout in `windows-sandbox-rs`, including the
reserved `gen` identifier, `unsafe extern` requirements, and new Clippy
findings that surfaced under the edition bump
- keep the edition bump separate from a larger unsafe cleanup by
temporarily allowing `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` in the Windows entrypoint
modules that now report it under Rust 2024
- update `codex-rs/windows-sandbox-rs/BUILD.bazel` to `crate_edition =
"2024"` so Bazel compiles the crate with the same edition as Cargo
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/15954).
* #15976
* #15955
* __->__ #15954