## Why
The zsh integration tests were still brittle in two ways:
- they relied on `CODEX_TEST_ZSH_PATH` / environment-specific setup, so
they often did not exercise the patched zsh fork that `shell-tool-mcp`
ships
- once the tests consistently used the vendored zsh fork, they exposed
real Linux-specific zsh-fork issues in CI
In particular, the Linux failures were not just test noise:
- the zsh-fork launch path was dropping `ExecRequest.arg0`, so Linux
`codex-linux-sandbox` arg0 dispatch did not run and zsh wrapper-mode
could receive malformed arguments
- the
`turn_start_shell_zsh_fork_subcommand_decline_marks_parent_declined_v2`
test uses the zsh exec bridge (which talks to the parent over a Unix
socket), but Linux restricted sandbox seccomp denies `connect(2)`,
causing timeouts on `ubuntu-24.04` x86/arm
This PR makes the zsh tests consistently run against the intended
vendored zsh fork and fixes/hardens the zsh-fork path so the Linux CI
signal is meaningful.
## What Changed
- Added a single shared test-only DotSlash file for the patched zsh fork
at `codex-rs/exec-server/tests/suite/zsh` (analogous to the existing
`bash` test resource).
- Updated both app-server and exec-server zsh tests to use that shared
DotSlash zsh (no duplicate zsh DotSlash file, no `CODEX_TEST_ZSH_PATH`
dependency).
- Updated the app-server zsh-fork test helper to resolve the shared
DotSlash zsh and avoid silently falling back to host zsh.
- Kept the app-server zsh-fork tests configured via `config.toml`, using
a test wrapper path where needed to force `zsh -df` (and rewrite `-lc`
to `-c`) for the subcommand-decline test.
- Hardened the app-server subcommand-decline zsh-fork test for CI
variability:
- tolerate an extra `/responses` POST with a no-op mock response
- tolerate non-target approval ordering while remaining strict on the
two `/usr/bin/true` approvals and decline behavior
- use `DangerFullAccess` on Linux for this one test because it validates
zsh approval flow, not Linux sandbox socket restrictions
- Fixed zsh-fork process launching on Linux by preserving `req.arg0` in
`ZshExecBridge::execute_shell_request(...)` so `codex-linux-sandbox`
arg0 dispatch continues to work.
- Moved `maybe_run_zsh_exec_wrapper_mode()` under
`arg0_dispatch_or_else(...)` in `app-server` and `cli` so wrapper-mode
handling coexists correctly with arg0-dispatched helper modes.
- Consolidated duplicated `dotslash -- fetch` resolution logic into
shared test support (`core/tests/common/lib.rs`).
- Updated `codex-rs/exec-server/tests/suite/accept_elicitation.rs` to
use DotSlash zsh and hardened the zsh elicitation test for Bazel/zsh
differences by:
- resolving an absolute `git` path
- running `git init --quiet .`
- asserting success / `.git` creation instead of relying on banner text
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server turn_start_zsh_fork -- --nocapture`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server accept_elicitation -- --nocapture`
- `bazel test //codex-rs/exec-server:exec-server-all-test
--test_output=streamed --test_arg=--nocapture
--test_arg=accept_elicitation_for_prompt_rule_with_zsh`
- CI (`rust-ci`) on the final cleaned commit: `Tests — ubuntu-24.04 -
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `Tests — ubuntu-24.04-arm -
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` passed in [run
22291424358](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/22291424358)
## PR Notes
This PR adds a project-scoped `babysit-pr` skill for ongoing PR
monitoring (CI, reviews, mergeability).
Simply invoke this skill after creating a PR, and codex will do its best
to get it to a mergeable state:
### What the skill does
* Fixes CI failures related to the PR
* Retries CI failures due to flaky tests
* Addresses code review comments if it agrees with them
* Addresses merge conflicts on main branch
### How the skill works
- Polls PR status on a loop (CI checks, workflow runs, review activity,
mergeability, and review decision).
- Detects new review feedback (including inline comments and automated
Codex review comments) and prompts/handles follow-up work.
- Distinguishes pending vs failed vs passed CI and identifies likely
flaky failures.
- Can retry failed checks/workflows when appropriate.
- Prioritizes actionable code review feedback over flaky CI retries (to
avoid rerunning CI on a SHA that is about to be replaced).
- Continues monitoring after fixes are applied and pushed, rather than
stopping after a progress update.
- Uses a slower backoff polling cadence once CI is green, while still
watching for new review feedback or state changes.
- Treats required review/approval as a blocking condition and keeps
watching until the PR is actually merge-ready (or merged/closed, or
human intervention is needed).
### Intended outcome
Keep the PR moving with minimal manual babysitting by continuously
watching for CI failures, reviewer feedback, and merge blockers, and
responding in the right order until the PR is ready to merge.
Summary
- map csharp/c-sharp aliases to the existing C# syntax in the highlight
matcher
- ensure the extension list and tests include .cs and the new aliases so
coverage stays accurate
Testing
<img width="543" height="266" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e6c8a42f-649c-4c30-b574-421b4287534c"
/>
## Summary
- order bundled and custom themes together by name while keeping entries
stable across platforms
- update the theme fixture names and tests to assert case-insensitive
ordering
Alt-d should delete the next word. It didn’t. Now it does. Added a small
test so it stays that way.
Details:
File updated:
[codex-rs/tui/src/bottom_pane/textarea.rs](./codex-rs/tui/src/bottom_pane/textarea.rs)
Test added: delete_forward_word_alt_d — verifies Alt-d deletes the next
word and keeps the cursor position correct.
Solves Issue #12453
Summary
- distinguish exec end handling targets (active tracking, active orphan
history, new cell) so unified exec responses don’t clobber unrelated
exploring cells
- ensure orphan ends flush existing exploring history when complete,
insert standalone history entries, and keep active cells correct
- add regression tests plus a snapshot covering the new behavior and
expose the ExecCell completion result for verification
Fix for https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/12278
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh McKinney <joshka@openai.com>
