## Why
Auto-review can deny an action that the user later decides they want to
retry. Today there is no TUI surface for selecting a recent denial and
sending explicit approval context back into the session, so users have
to restate intent manually and the retry can be reviewed without the
original denied action context.
This adds a narrow TUI-driven path for approving a recent denied action
while still keeping the retry inside the normal auto-review flow.
## What Changed
- Added `/auto-review-denials` to open a picker of recent denied
auto-review actions.
- Added a small in-memory TUI store for the 10 most recent denied
auto-review events.
- Selecting a denial sends the structured denied event back through the
existing core/app-server op path.
- Core now injects a developer message containing the approved action
JSON rather than the full assessment event.
- Auto-review transcript collection now preserves this specific approval
developer message so follow-up review sessions can see the user approval
context.
- Added TUI snapshot/unit coverage for the picker and approval dispatch
path.
- Added core coverage for retaining the approval developer message in
the auto-review transcript.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-core
collect_guardian_transcript_entries_keeps_manual_approval_developer_message`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui auto_review_denials`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui
approving_recent_denial_emits_structured_core_op_once`
## Notes
This intentionally keeps retries going through auto-review. The approval
signal is context for the exact previously denied action, not a blanket
bypass for similar future actions.
## Why
The remaining migration work still needs `SandboxPolicy` at a few
compatibility boundaries, but those projections should come from one
canonical path. Keeping ad hoc legacy projections scattered through
app-server, CLI, and config code makes it easy for behavior to drift as
`PermissionProfile` gains fidelity that the legacy enum cannot
represent.
## What Changed
- Adds `Permissions::legacy_sandbox_policy(cwd)` and
`Config::legacy_sandbox_policy()` as the compatibility projection from
the canonical `PermissionProfile`.
- Adds `Permissions::can_set_legacy_sandbox_policy()` so legacy inputs
are checked after they are converted into profile semantics.
- Updates app-server command handling, Windows sandbox setup, session
configuration, and sandbox summaries to use the centralized projection
helper.
- Leaves `SandboxPolicy` in place only for boundary inputs/outputs that
still speak the legacy abstraction.
## Verification
- `cargo check -p codex-config -p codex-core -p codex-sandboxing -p
codex-app-server -p codex-cli -p codex-tui`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui
permissions_selection_history_snapshot_full_access_to_default --
--nocapture`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui
permissions_selection_sends_approvals_reviewer_in_override_turn_context
-- --nocapture`
- `bazel test //codex-rs/tui:tui-unit-tests-bin
--test_arg=permissions_selection_history_snapshot_full_access_to_default
--test_output=errors`
- `bazel test //codex-rs/tui:tui-unit-tests-bin
--test_arg=permissions_selection_sends_approvals_reviewer_in_override_turn_context
--test_output=errors`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/19734).
* #19737
* #19736
* #19735
* __->__ #19734
# Why
Requirements support host-specific
`remote_sandbox_config.hostname_patterns`, but config loading previously
resolved and passed the system hostname through every config-loading
path even when no requirements layer used `remote_sandbox_config`. On
machines where hostname lookup is slow, startup and app-server config
reads paid for a feature that was not active.
We only need the hostname when a requirements layer actually declares
`remote_sandbox_config`, so this moves hostname resolution to the single
requirements merge point and keeps all other config callers unaware of
hostname matching.
# What
- Removed the eager `host_name` plumbing from
`load_config_layers_state`, `load_requirements_toml`, `ConfigBuilder`,
app-server `ConfigManager`, network proxy loading, and related call
sites.
- Resolve the hostname inside
`merge_requirements_with_remote_sandbox_config` only when the incoming
requirements contain `remote_sandbox_config`.
Michael Bolin