I think raising it to 45 minutes in
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/19578 was a mistake for the reasons
explained in the comments in the code. Instead, we attempt to defend
against timeouts by increasing the number of shards in
`app-server-all-test` so that a "true failure" that gets run 3x should
not take as much wall clock time.
## Why
Windows can represent the same canonical local path with either a normal
drive path or a verbatim device path prefix. The failure pattern that
motivated this PR was an assertion diff like `C:\...` versus
`\\?\C:\...`: different spellings, same file.
That became visible while validating the permissions stack above this
PR. The stack increasingly routes paths through `AbsolutePathBuf`, which
normalizes supported Windows device prefixes, while several existing
tests still built expected values directly with
`std::fs::canonicalize()` or compared `AbsolutePathBuf::as_path()` to a
raw `PathBuf`. On Windows, that can make tests fail because the two
sides choose different textual forms for an otherwise equivalent
canonical path.
This PR is intentionally split out as the bottom PR below #19606. The
runtime permissions migration should not carry unrelated Windows test
stabilization, and reviewers should be able to verify this as a
test-only change before looking at the larger permissions changes.
## Failure Modes Covered
- `conversation_summary` expected rollout paths were built from raw
canonicalized `PathBuf`s, while app-server responses could carry
`AbsolutePathBuf`-normalized paths.
- `thread_resume` compared returned thread paths directly to previously
stored or fixture paths, so a verbatim-prefix spelling could fail an
otherwise correct resume.
- `marketplace_add` compared plugin install roots through `as_path()`
against raw canonicalized paths, reproducing the same `C:\...` versus
`\\?\C:\...` mismatch in both app-server and core-plugin coverage.
## What Changed
- In `app-server/tests/suite/conversation_summary.rs`, normalize both
expected rollout paths and received `ConversationSummary.path` values
through `AbsolutePathBuf` before comparing the full summary object.
- In `app-server/tests/suite/v2/thread_resume.rs`, normalize both sides
of thread path comparisons before asserting equality. This keeps the
tests focused on whether resume returned the same existing path, not
whether Windows used the same string spelling.
- In `app-server/tests/suite/v2/marketplace_add.rs` and
`core-plugins/src/marketplace_add.rs`, compare install roots as
`AbsolutePathBuf` values instead of comparing an absolute-path wrapper
to a raw canonicalized `PathBuf`.
## Behavior
This PR does not change production app-server or marketplace behavior.
It only changes tests to assert semantic path identity across Windows
path spelling variants. It also leaves API response values untouched;
the normalization happens inside assertions only.
## Verification
Targeted local checks run while extracting this fix:
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
get_conversation_summary_by_thread_id_reads_rollout`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
get_conversation_summary_by_relative_rollout_path_resolves_from_codex_home`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
thread_resume_prefers_path_over_thread_id`
Windows-specific confidence comes from the Bazel Windows CI job for this
PR, since the failure is platform-specific.
## Docs
No docs update is needed because this is test-only infrastructure
stabilization.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/19604).
* #19395
* #19394
* #19393
* #19392
* #19606
* __->__ #19604
## Why
`sandbox_permissions = "require_escalated"` is treated as an explicit
request to approve the command and run it outside the
filesystem/platform sandbox. Before this change, shell and unified exec
still registered managed network approval context and could inject
Codex-managed proxy state into the child process, which meant an
approved escalated command could still hit a second network approval
path.
This PR makes that escalation boundary consistent: once a command is
explicitly approved to run outside the sandbox, Codex does not also
route that process through the managed network proxy.
## Security impact
Command/filesystem sandbox approval now implies network approval for
that command. If an untrusted command or script is allowed to run with
`require_escalated`, its network calls are unsandboxed: Codex-managed
network allowlists and denylists are not respected for that process, so
the command can exfiltrate any data it can read.
## What changed
- Skip managed network approval specs for
`SandboxPermissions::RequireEscalated`.
- Pass `network: None` into shell, zsh-fork shell, and unified exec
sandbox preparation for explicitly escalated requests.
- Strip Codex-managed proxy environment variables when
`CODEX_NETWORK_PROXY_ACTIVE` is present, while preserving user proxy env
when the Codex marker is absent.
- Add regression coverage for the prepared exec request so the old
behavior cannot silently reappear.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-core explicit_escalation`
- `cargo clippy -p codex-core --all-targets -- -D warnings`
Michael Bolin