This required changing `ts_println!()` to take `$self:ident`, which is a
bit more verbose, but the usability improvement seems worth it.
Also eliminated an unnecessary `.to_string()` while here.
Fixes:
* Instantiate `EventProcessor` earlier in `lib.rs` so
`print_config_summary()` can be an instance method of it and leverage
its various `Style` fields to ensure it honors `with_ansi` properly.
* After printing the config summary, print out user's prompt with the
heading `User instructions:`. As noted in the comment, now that we can
read the instructions via stdin as of #1178, it is helpful to the user
to ensure they know what instructions were given to Codex.
* Use same colors/bold/italic settings for headers as the TUI, making
the output a bit easier to read.
This attempts to make `codex exec` more flexible in how the prompt can
be passed:
* as before, it can be passed as a single string argument
* if `-` is passed as the value, the prompt is read from stdin
* if no argument is passed _and stdin is a tty_, prints a warning to
stderr that no prompt was specified an exits non-zero.
* if no argument is passed _and stdin is NOT a tty_, prints `Reading
prompt from stdin...` to stderr to let the user know that Codex will
wait until it reads EOF from stdin to proceed. (You can repro this case
by doing `yes | just exec` since stdin is not a TTY in that case but it
also never reaches EOF).
The main motivator behind this PR is that `stream_chat_completions()`
was not adding the `"tools"` entry to the payload posted to the
`/chat/completions` endpoint. This (1) refactors the existing logic to
build up the `"tools"` JSON from `client.rs` into `openai_tools.rs`, and
(2) updates the use of responses API (`client.rs`) and chat completions
API (`chat_completions.rs`) to both use it.
Note this PR alone is not sufficient to get tool calling from chat
completions working: that is done in
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1167.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/1177).
* #1167
* __->__ #1177
This is a first cut at a GitHub Action that lets you define prompt
templates in `.md` files under `.github/codex/labels` that will run
Codex with the associated prompt when the label is added to a GitHub
pull request.
For example, this PR includes these files:
```
.github/codex/labels/codex-attempt.md
.github/codex/labels/codex-code-review.md
.github/codex/labels/codex-investigate-issue.md
```
And the new `.github/workflows/codex.yml` workflow declares the
following triggers:
```yaml
on:
issues:
types: [opened, labeled]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
types: [labeled]
```
as well as the following expression to gate the action:
```
jobs:
codex:
if: |
(github.event_name == 'issues' && (
(github.event.action == 'labeled' && (github.event.label.name == 'codex-attempt' || github.event.label.name == 'codex-investigate-issue'))
)) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.action == 'labeled' && github.event.label.name == 'codex-code-review')
```
Note the "actor" who added the label must have write access to the repo
for the action to take effect.
After adding a label, the action will "ack" the request by replacing the
original label (e.g., `codex-review`) with an `-in-progress` suffix
(e.g., `codex-review-in-progress`). When it is finished, it will swap
the `-in-progress` label with a `-completed` one (e.g.,
`codex-review-completed`).
Users of the action are responsible for providing an `OPENAI_API_KEY`
and making it available as a secret to the action.
Michael Bolin