## Summary
This adds the structural plumbing needed for an app-server client to
approve a previously denied Guardian review and carry that approval
context into the next model turn.
This PR does not add the actual `/auto-review-denials` tool
## What Changed
- Added app-server v2 RPC `thread/approveGuardianDeniedAction`.
- Added generated JSON schema and TypeScript fixtures for
`ThreadApproveGuardianDeniedAction*`.
- Added core `Op::ApproveGuardianDeniedAction`.
- Added a core handler that validates the event is a denied Guardian
assessment and injects a developer message containing the stored denial
event JSON.
- Queues the approval context for the next turn if there is no active
turn yet.
- Added the TUI app-server bridge so `Op::ApproveGuardianDeniedAction {
event }` is routed to the app-server request.
## What This Does Not Do
- Does not add `/auto-review-denials`.
- Does not add chat widget recent-denial state.
- Does not add popup/list UI.
- Does not add a product-facing denial lookup/store.
- Does not change where Guardian denials are originally emitted or
persisted.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-tui thread_approve_guardian_denied_action`
## Summary
Wires rollout trace recording into `codex-core` session and turn
execution. This records the core model request/response, compaction, and
session lifecycle boundaries needed for replay without yet tracing every
nested runtime/tool boundary.
## Stack
This is PR 2/5 in the rollout trace stack.
- [#18876](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18876): Add rollout
trace crate
- [#18877](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18877): Record core
session rollout traces
- [#18878](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18878): Trace tool and
code-mode boundaries
- [#18879](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18879): Trace sessions
and multi-agent edges
- [#18880](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18880): Add debug trace
reduction command
## Review Notes
This layer is the first live integration point. The important review
question is whether trace recording is isolated from normal session
behavior: trace failures should not become user-visible execution
failures, and recording should preserve the existing turn/session
lifecycle semantics.
The PR depends on the reducer/data model from the first stack entry and
only introduces the core recorder surface that later PRs use for richer
runtime and relationship events.
Addresses #18860
Problem: Remote app-server clients could stop draining websocket events
when their bounded local event channel filled, leaving clients stuck on
stale in-progress turns after a disconnect.
Solution: Use an unbounded local event channel for the remote client so
the websocket reader can keep forwarding disconnect and progress events
instead of blocking or dropping them.
Why this is reasonable: This does not make the remote websocket itself
unbounded. The changed queue lives inside the remote client, between the
task that reads the remote websocket and the API consumer in the same
client process. Once an event has been received from the remote server,
preserving it is preferable to blocking websocket reads or dropping
disconnect/lifecycle events; network-level backpressure still happens at
the websocket boundary if the remote side outpaces the client.
Michael Bolin