Add approval allow-prefix flow in core and tui

Add explicit prefix-approval decision and wire it through execpolicy/UI snapshots

update doc

mutating in memory policy instead of reloading

using RW locks

clippy

refactor: adding allow_prefix into ApprovedAllowPrefix

fmt

do not send allow_prefix if execpolicy is disabled

moving args around

cleanup exec_policy getters

undo diff

fixing rw lock bug causing tui to hang

updating phrasing

integration test

.

fix compile

fix flaky test

fix compile error

running test with single thread

fixup allow_prefix_if_applicable

fix formatting

fix approvals test

only cloning when needed

docs

add docstring

fix rebase bug

fixing rebase issues

Revert "fixing rebase issues"

This reverts commit 79ce7e1f2fc0378c2c0b362408e2e544566540fd.

fix rebase errors
This commit is contained in:
kevin zhao
2025-12-02 22:01:35 -05:00
parent dbec741ef0
commit b6dc1be5dd
27 changed files with 664 additions and 107 deletions
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn apply_bespoke_event_handling(
cwd,
reason,
risk,
allow_prefix: _allow_prefix,
parsed_cmd,
}) => match api_version {
ApiVersion::V1 => {
+3 -1
View File
@@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ pub(crate) async fn apply_patch(
)
.await;
match rx_approve.await.unwrap_or_default() {
ReviewDecision::Approved | ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => {
ReviewDecision::Approved
| ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix { .. }
| ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => {
InternalApplyPatchInvocation::DelegateToExec(ApplyPatchExec {
action,
user_explicitly_approved_this_action: true,
+65 -5
View File
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ use crate::error::CodexErr;
use crate::error::Result as CodexResult;
#[cfg(test)]
use crate::exec::StreamOutput;
use crate::exec_policy::ExecPolicyUpdateError;
use crate::mcp::auth::compute_auth_statuses;
use crate::mcp_connection_manager::McpConnectionManager;
use crate::model_family::find_family_for_model;
@@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ pub(crate) struct TurnContext {
pub(crate) final_output_json_schema: Option<Value>,
pub(crate) codex_linux_sandbox_exe: Option<PathBuf>,
pub(crate) tool_call_gate: Arc<ReadinessFlag>,
pub(crate) exec_policy: Arc<ExecPolicy>,
pub(crate) exec_policy: Arc<RwLock<ExecPolicy>>,
pub(crate) truncation_policy: TruncationPolicy,
}
@@ -346,7 +347,7 @@ pub(crate) struct SessionConfiguration {
/// Set of feature flags for this session
features: Features,
/// Execpolicy policy, applied only when enabled by feature flag.
exec_policy: Arc<ExecPolicy>,
exec_policy: Arc<RwLock<ExecPolicy>>,
// TODO(pakrym): Remove config from here
original_config_do_not_use: Arc<Config>,
@@ -861,11 +862,44 @@ impl Session {
.await
}
pub(crate) async fn persist_command_allow_prefix(
&self,
prefix: &[String],
) -> Result<(), ExecPolicyUpdateError> {
let (features, codex_home, current_policy) = {
let state = self.state.lock().await;
(
state.session_configuration.features.clone(),
state
.session_configuration
.original_config_do_not_use
.codex_home
.clone(),
state.session_configuration.exec_policy.clone(),
)
};
if !features.enabled(Feature::ExecPolicy) {
error!("attempted to append execpolicy rule while execpolicy feature is disabled");
return Err(ExecPolicyUpdateError::FeatureDisabled);
}
crate::exec_policy::append_allow_prefix_rule_and_update(
&codex_home,
&current_policy,
prefix,
)
.await?;
Ok(())
}
/// Emit an exec approval request event and await the user's decision.
///
/// The request is keyed by `sub_id`/`call_id` so matching responses are delivered
/// to the correct in-flight turn. If the task is aborted, this returns the
/// default `ReviewDecision` (`Denied`).
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
pub async fn request_command_approval(
&self,
turn_context: &TurnContext,
@@ -874,6 +908,7 @@ impl Session {
cwd: PathBuf,
reason: Option<String>,
risk: Option<SandboxCommandAssessment>,
allow_prefix: Option<Vec<String>>,
) -> ReviewDecision {
let sub_id = turn_context.sub_id.clone();
// Add the tx_approve callback to the map before sending the request.
@@ -901,6 +936,7 @@ impl Session {
cwd,
reason,
risk,
allow_prefix,
parsed_cmd,
});
self.send_event(turn_context, event).await;
@@ -1075,6 +1111,15 @@ impl Session {
.enabled(feature)
}
pub(crate) async fn features(&self) -> Features {
self.state
.lock()
.await
.session_configuration
.features
.clone()
}
async fn send_raw_response_items(&self, turn_context: &TurnContext, items: &[ResponseItem]) {
for item in items {
self.send_event(
@@ -1508,6 +1553,7 @@ mod handlers {
use codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision;
use codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewRequest;
use codex_protocol::protocol::TurnAbortReason;
use codex_protocol::protocol::WarningEvent;
use codex_protocol::user_input::UserInput;
use codex_rmcp_client::ElicitationAction;
@@ -1622,7 +1668,21 @@ mod handlers {
}
}
/// Propagate a user's exec approval decision to the session
/// Also optionally whitelists command in execpolicy
pub async fn exec_approval(sess: &Arc<Session>, id: String, decision: ReviewDecision) {
if let ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix { allow_prefix } = &decision
&& let Err(err) = sess.persist_command_allow_prefix(allow_prefix).await
{
let message = format!("Failed to update execpolicy allow list: {err}");
tracing::warn!("{message}");
let warning = EventMsg::Warning(WarningEvent { message });
sess.send_event_raw(Event {
id: id.clone(),
msg: warning,
})
.await;
}
match decision {
ReviewDecision::Abort => {
sess.interrupt_task().await;
@@ -2578,7 +2638,7 @@ mod tests {
cwd: config.cwd.clone(),
original_config_do_not_use: Arc::clone(&config),
features: Features::default(),
exec_policy: Arc::new(ExecPolicy::empty()),
exec_policy: Arc::new(RwLock::new(ExecPolicy::empty())),
session_source: SessionSource::Exec,
};
@@ -2777,7 +2837,7 @@ mod tests {
cwd: config.cwd.clone(),
original_config_do_not_use: Arc::clone(&config),
features: Features::default(),
exec_policy: Arc::new(ExecPolicy::empty()),
exec_policy: Arc::new(RwLock::new(ExecPolicy::empty())),
session_source: SessionSource::Exec,
};
@@ -2855,7 +2915,7 @@ mod tests {
cwd: config.cwd.clone(),
original_config_do_not_use: Arc::clone(&config),
features: Features::default(),
exec_policy: Arc::new(ExecPolicy::empty()),
exec_policy: Arc::new(RwLock::new(ExecPolicy::empty())),
session_source: SessionSource::Exec,
};
+1
View File
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ async fn handle_exec_approval(
event.cwd,
event.reason,
event.risk,
event.allow_prefix,
);
let decision = await_approval_with_cancel(
approval_fut,
+287 -55
View File
@@ -4,14 +4,18 @@ use std::path::PathBuf;
use std::sync::Arc;
use crate::command_safety::is_dangerous_command::requires_initial_appoval;
use codex_execpolicy::AmendError;
use codex_execpolicy::Decision;
use codex_execpolicy::Error as ExecPolicyRuleError;
use codex_execpolicy::Evaluation;
use codex_execpolicy::Policy;
use codex_execpolicy::PolicyParser;
use codex_execpolicy::blocking_append_allow_prefix_rule;
use codex_protocol::protocol::AskForApproval;
use codex_protocol::protocol::SandboxPolicy;
use thiserror::Error;
use tokio::fs;
use tokio::sync::RwLock;
use crate::bash::parse_shell_lc_plain_commands;
use crate::features::Feature;
@@ -23,6 +27,7 @@ const FORBIDDEN_REASON: &str = "execpolicy forbids this command";
const PROMPT_REASON: &str = "execpolicy requires approval for this command";
const POLICY_DIR_NAME: &str = "policy";
const POLICY_EXTENSION: &str = "codexpolicy";
const DEFAULT_POLICY_FILE: &str = "default.codexpolicy";
#[derive(Debug, Error)]
pub enum ExecPolicyError {
@@ -45,12 +50,27 @@ pub enum ExecPolicyError {
},
}
#[derive(Debug, Error)]
pub enum ExecPolicyUpdateError {
#[error("failed to update execpolicy file {path}: {source}")]
AppendRule { path: PathBuf, source: AmendError },
#[error("failed to update in-memory execpolicy: {source}")]
AddRule {
#[from]
source: ExecPolicyRuleError,
},
#[error("cannot append execpolicy rule because execpolicy feature is disabled")]
FeatureDisabled,
}
pub(crate) async fn exec_policy_for(
features: &Features,
codex_home: &Path,
) -> Result<Arc<Policy>, ExecPolicyError> {
) -> Result<Arc<RwLock<Policy>>, ExecPolicyError> {
if !features.enabled(Feature::ExecPolicy) {
return Ok(Arc::new(Policy::empty()));
return Ok(Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty())));
}
let policy_dir = codex_home.join(POLICY_DIR_NAME);
@@ -74,7 +94,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn exec_policy_for(
})?;
}
let policy = Arc::new(parser.build());
let policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(parser.build()));
tracing::debug!(
"loaded execpolicy from {} files in {}",
policy_paths.len(),
@@ -84,58 +104,102 @@ pub(crate) async fn exec_policy_for(
Ok(policy)
}
fn evaluate_with_policy(
policy: &Policy,
command: &[String],
approval_policy: AskForApproval,
) -> Option<ApprovalRequirement> {
let commands = parse_shell_lc_plain_commands(command).unwrap_or_else(|| vec![command.to_vec()]);
let evaluation = policy.check_multiple(commands.iter());
pub(crate) fn default_policy_path(codex_home: &Path) -> PathBuf {
codex_home.join(POLICY_DIR_NAME).join(DEFAULT_POLICY_FILE)
}
match evaluation {
Evaluation::Match { decision, .. } => match decision {
Decision::Forbidden => Some(ApprovalRequirement::Forbidden {
reason: FORBIDDEN_REASON.to_string(),
}),
Decision::Prompt => {
let reason = PROMPT_REASON.to_string();
if matches!(approval_policy, AskForApproval::Never) {
Some(ApprovalRequirement::Forbidden { reason })
} else {
Some(ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: Some(reason),
})
pub(crate) async fn append_allow_prefix_rule_and_update(
codex_home: &Path,
current_policy: &Arc<RwLock<Policy>>,
prefix: &[String],
) -> Result<(), ExecPolicyUpdateError> {
let policy_path = default_policy_path(codex_home);
blocking_append_allow_prefix_rule(&policy_path, prefix).map_err(|source| {
ExecPolicyUpdateError::AppendRule {
path: policy_path,
source,
}
})?;
current_policy
.write()
.await
.add_prefix_rule(prefix, Decision::Allow)?;
Ok(())
}
fn requirement_from_decision(
decision: Decision,
approval_policy: AskForApproval,
) -> ApprovalRequirement {
match decision {
Decision::Forbidden => ApprovalRequirement::Forbidden {
reason: FORBIDDEN_REASON.to_string(),
},
Decision::Prompt => {
let reason = PROMPT_REASON.to_string();
if matches!(approval_policy, AskForApproval::Never) {
ApprovalRequirement::Forbidden { reason }
} else {
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: Some(reason),
allow_prefix: None,
}
}
Decision::Allow => Some(ApprovalRequirement::Skip {
bypass_sandbox: true,
}),
}
Decision::Allow => ApprovalRequirement::Skip {
bypass_sandbox: true,
},
Evaluation::NoMatch { .. } => None,
}
}
/// Return an allow-prefix option when a single plain command needs approval without
/// any matching policy rule. We only surface the prefix opt-in when execpolicy did
/// not already drive the decision (NoMatch) and when the command is a single
/// unrolled command (multi-part scripts shouldn’t be whitelisted via prefix) and
/// when execpolicy feature is enabled.
fn allow_prefix_if_applicable(
commands: &[Vec<String>],
features: &Features,
) -> Option<Vec<String>> {
if features.enabled(Feature::ExecPolicy) && commands.len() == 1 {
Some(commands[0].clone())
} else {
None
}
}
pub(crate) async fn create_approval_requirement_for_command(
policy: &Policy,
exec_policy: &Arc<RwLock<Policy>>,
features: &Features,
command: &[String],
approval_policy: AskForApproval,
sandbox_policy: &SandboxPolicy,
sandbox_permissions: SandboxPermissions,
) -> ApprovalRequirement {
if let Some(requirement) = evaluate_with_policy(policy, command, approval_policy) {
return requirement;
}
let commands = parse_shell_lc_plain_commands(command).unwrap_or_else(|| vec![command.to_vec()]);
let policy = exec_policy.read().await;
let evaluation = policy.check_multiple(commands.iter());
if requires_initial_appoval(
approval_policy,
sandbox_policy,
command,
sandbox_permissions,
) {
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval { reason: None }
} else {
ApprovalRequirement::Skip {
bypass_sandbox: false,
match evaluation {
Evaluation::Match { decision, .. } => requirement_from_decision(decision, approval_policy),
Evaluation::NoMatch { .. } => {
if requires_initial_appoval(
approval_policy,
sandbox_policy,
command,
sandbox_permissions,
) {
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: None,
allow_prefix: allow_prefix_if_applicable(&commands, features),
}
} else {
ApprovalRequirement::Skip {
bypass_sandbox: false,
}
}
}
}
}
@@ -195,6 +259,7 @@ mod tests {
use codex_protocol::protocol::SandboxPolicy;
use pretty_assertions::assert_eq;
use std::fs;
use std::sync::Arc;
use tempfile::tempdir;
#[tokio::test]
@@ -209,7 +274,7 @@ mod tests {
let commands = [vec!["rm".to_string()]];
assert!(matches!(
policy.check_multiple(commands.iter()),
policy.read().await.check_multiple(commands.iter()),
Evaluation::NoMatch { .. }
));
assert!(!temp_dir.path().join(POLICY_DIR_NAME).exists());
@@ -243,7 +308,7 @@ mod tests {
.expect("policy result");
let command = [vec!["rm".to_string()]];
assert!(matches!(
policy.check_multiple(command.iter()),
policy.read().await.check_multiple(command.iter()),
Evaluation::Match { .. }
));
}
@@ -262,13 +327,13 @@ mod tests {
.expect("policy result");
let command = [vec!["ls".to_string()]];
assert!(matches!(
policy.check_multiple(command.iter()),
policy.read().await.check_multiple(command.iter()),
Evaluation::NoMatch { .. }
));
}
#[test]
fn evaluates_bash_lc_inner_commands() {
#[tokio::test]
async fn evaluates_bash_lc_inner_commands() {
let policy_src = r#"
prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
"#;
@@ -276,7 +341,7 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
parser
.parse("test.codexpolicy", policy_src)
.expect("parse policy");
let policy = parser.build();
let policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(parser.build()));
let forbidden_script = vec![
"bash".to_string(),
@@ -284,9 +349,15 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
"rm -rf /tmp".to_string(),
];
let requirement =
evaluate_with_policy(&policy, &forbidden_script, AskForApproval::OnRequest)
.expect("expected match for forbidden command");
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&policy,
&Features::with_defaults(),
&forbidden_script,
AskForApproval::OnRequest,
&SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess,
SandboxPermissions::UseDefault,
)
.await;
assert_eq!(
requirement,
@@ -303,11 +374,12 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
parser
.parse("test.codexpolicy", policy_src)
.expect("parse policy");
let policy = parser.build();
let policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(parser.build()));
let command = vec!["rm".to_string()];
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&policy,
&Features::with_defaults(),
&command,
AskForApproval::OnRequest,
&SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess,
@@ -318,7 +390,8 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
assert_eq!(
requirement,
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: Some(PROMPT_REASON.to_string())
reason: Some(PROMPT_REASON.to_string()),
allow_prefix: None,
}
);
}
@@ -330,11 +403,12 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
parser
.parse("test.codexpolicy", policy_src)
.expect("parse policy");
let policy = parser.build();
let policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(parser.build()));
let command = vec!["rm".to_string()];
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&policy,
&Features::with_defaults(),
&command,
AskForApproval::Never,
&SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess,
@@ -354,9 +428,10 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
async fn approval_requirement_falls_back_to_heuristics() {
let command = vec!["python".to_string()];
let empty_policy = Policy::empty();
let empty_policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty()));
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&empty_policy,
&Features::with_defaults(),
&command,
AskForApproval::UnlessTrusted,
&SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly,
@@ -366,7 +441,164 @@ prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="forbidden")
assert_eq!(
requirement,
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval { reason: None }
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: None,
allow_prefix: Some(command)
}
);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn append_allow_prefix_rule_updates_policy_and_file() {
let codex_home = tempdir().expect("create temp dir");
let current_policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty()));
let prefix = vec!["echo".to_string(), "hello".to_string()];
append_allow_prefix_rule_and_update(codex_home.path(), &current_policy, &prefix)
.await
.expect("update policy");
let evaluation = current_policy.read().await.check(&[
"echo".to_string(),
"hello".to_string(),
"world".to_string(),
]);
assert!(matches!(
evaluation,
Evaluation::Match {
decision: Decision::Allow,
..
}
));
let contents = fs::read_to_string(default_policy_path(codex_home.path()))
.expect("policy file should have been created");
assert_eq!(
contents,
r#"prefix_rule(pattern=["echo", "hello"], decision="allow")
"#
);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn append_allow_prefix_rule_rejects_empty_prefix() {
let codex_home = tempdir().expect("create temp dir");
let current_policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty()));
let result =
append_allow_prefix_rule_and_update(codex_home.path(), &current_policy, &[]).await;
assert!(matches!(
result,
Err(ExecPolicyUpdateError::AppendRule {
source: AmendError::EmptyPrefix,
..
})
));
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn allow_prefix_is_present_for_single_command_without_policy_match() {
let command = vec!["python".to_string()];
let empty_policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty()));
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&empty_policy,
&Features::with_defaults(),
&command,
AskForApproval::UnlessTrusted,
&SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly,
SandboxPermissions::UseDefault,
)
.await;
assert_eq!(
requirement,
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: None,
allow_prefix: Some(command)
}
);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn allow_prefix_is_disabled_when_execpolicy_feature_disabled() {
let command = vec!["python".to_string()];
let mut features = Features::with_defaults();
features.disable(Feature::ExecPolicy);
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty())),
&features,
&command,
AskForApproval::UnlessTrusted,
&SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly,
SandboxPermissions::UseDefault,
)
.await;
assert_eq!(
requirement,
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: None,
allow_prefix: None,
}
);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn allow_prefix_is_omitted_when_policy_prompts() {
let policy_src = r#"prefix_rule(pattern=["rm"], decision="prompt")"#;
let mut parser = PolicyParser::new();
parser
.parse("test.codexpolicy", policy_src)
.expect("parse policy");
let policy = Arc::new(RwLock::new(parser.build()));
let command = vec!["rm".to_string()];
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&policy,
&Features::with_defaults(),
&command,
AskForApproval::OnRequest,
&SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess,
SandboxPermissions::UseDefault,
)
.await;
assert_eq!(
requirement,
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: Some(PROMPT_REASON.to_string()),
allow_prefix: None,
}
);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn allow_prefix_is_omitted_for_multi_command_scripts() {
let command = vec![
"bash".to_string(),
"-lc".to_string(),
"python && echo ok".to_string(),
];
let requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&Arc::new(RwLock::new(Policy::empty())),
&Features::with_defaults(),
&command,
AskForApproval::UnlessTrusted,
&SandboxPolicy::ReadOnly,
SandboxPermissions::UseDefault,
)
.await;
assert_eq!(
requirement,
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: None,
allow_prefix: None,
}
);
}
}
+2 -1
View File
@@ -231,15 +231,16 @@ impl ShellHandler {
let event_ctx = ToolEventCtx::new(session.as_ref(), turn.as_ref(), &call_id, None);
emitter.begin(event_ctx).await;
let features = session.features().await;
let approval_requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&turn.exec_policy,
&features,
&exec_params.command,
turn.approval_policy,
&turn.sandbox_policy,
SandboxPermissions::from(exec_params.with_escalated_permissions.unwrap_or(false)),
)
.await;
let req = ShellRequest {
command: exec_params.command.clone(),
cwd: exec_params.cwd.clone(),
+10 -6
View File
@@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ impl ToolOrchestrator {
});
match requirement {
ApprovalRequirement::Skip { .. } => {
otel.tool_decision(otel_tn, otel_ci, ReviewDecision::Approved, otel_cfg);
otel.tool_decision(otel_tn, otel_ci, &ReviewDecision::Approved, otel_cfg);
}
ApprovalRequirement::Forbidden { reason } => {
return Err(ToolError::Rejected(reason));
}
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval { reason } => {
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval { reason, .. } => {
let mut risk = None;
if let Some(metadata) = req.sandbox_retry_data() {
@@ -88,13 +88,15 @@ impl ToolOrchestrator {
};
let decision = tool.start_approval_async(req, approval_ctx).await;
otel.tool_decision(otel_tn, otel_ci, decision, otel_user.clone());
otel.tool_decision(otel_tn, otel_ci, &decision, otel_user.clone());
match decision {
ReviewDecision::Denied | ReviewDecision::Abort => {
return Err(ToolError::Rejected("rejected by user".to_string()));
}
ReviewDecision::Approved | ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => {}
ReviewDecision::Approved
| ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix { .. }
| ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => {}
}
already_approved = true;
}
@@ -169,13 +171,15 @@ impl ToolOrchestrator {
};
let decision = tool.start_approval_async(req, approval_ctx).await;
otel.tool_decision(otel_tn, otel_ci, decision, otel_user);
otel.tool_decision(otel_tn, otel_ci, &decision, otel_user);
match decision {
ReviewDecision::Denied | ReviewDecision::Abort => {
return Err(ToolError::Rejected("rejected by user".to_string()));
}
ReviewDecision::Approved | ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => {}
ReviewDecision::Approved
| ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix { .. }
| ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => {}
}
}
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ impl Approvable<ApplyPatchRequest> for ApplyPatchRuntime {
cwd,
Some(reason),
risk,
None,
)
.await
} else if user_explicitly_approved {
+9 -1
View File
@@ -107,7 +107,15 @@ impl Approvable<ShellRequest> for ShellRuntime {
Box::pin(async move {
with_cached_approval(&session.services, key, move || async move {
session
.request_command_approval(turn, call_id, command, cwd, reason, risk)
.request_command_approval(
turn,
call_id,
command,
cwd,
reason,
risk,
req.approval_requirement.allow_prefix().cloned(),
)
.await
})
.await
@@ -125,7 +125,15 @@ impl Approvable<UnifiedExecRequest> for UnifiedExecRuntime<'_> {
Box::pin(async move {
with_cached_approval(&session.services, key, || async move {
session
.request_command_approval(turn, call_id, command, cwd, reason, risk)
.request_command_approval(
turn,
call_id,
command,
cwd,
reason,
risk,
req.approval_requirement.allow_prefix().cloned(),
)
.await
})
.await
+21 -2
View File
@@ -96,11 +96,27 @@ pub(crate) enum ApprovalRequirement {
bypass_sandbox: bool,
},
/// Approval required for this tool call
NeedsApproval { reason: Option<String> },
NeedsApproval {
reason: Option<String>,
/// Prefix that can be whitelisted via execpolicy to skip future approvals for similar commands
allow_prefix: Option<Vec<String>>,
},
/// Execution forbidden for this tool call
Forbidden { reason: String },
}
impl ApprovalRequirement {
pub fn allow_prefix(&self) -> Option<&Vec<String>> {
match self {
Self::NeedsApproval {
allow_prefix: Some(prefix),
..
} => Some(prefix),
_ => None,
}
}
}
/// - Never, OnFailure: do not ask
/// - OnRequest: ask unless sandbox policy is DangerFullAccess
/// - UnlessTrusted: always ask
@@ -115,7 +131,10 @@ pub(crate) fn default_approval_requirement(
};
if needs_approval {
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval { reason: None }
ApprovalRequirement::NeedsApproval {
reason: None,
allow_prefix: None,
}
} else {
ApprovalRequirement::Skip {
bypass_sandbox: false,
@@ -552,10 +552,12 @@ impl UnifiedExecSessionManager {
context: &UnifiedExecContext,
) -> Result<UnifiedExecSession, UnifiedExecError> {
let env = apply_unified_exec_env(create_env(&context.turn.shell_environment_policy));
let features = context.session.features().await;
let mut orchestrator = ToolOrchestrator::new();
let mut runtime = UnifiedExecRuntime::new(self);
let approval_requirement = create_approval_requirement_for_command(
&context.turn.exec_policy,
&features,
command,
context.turn.approval_policy,
&context.turn.sandbox_policy,
+137 -2
View File
@@ -1523,7 +1523,7 @@ async fn run_scenario(scenario: &ScenarioSpec) -> Result<()> {
test.codex
.submit(Op::ExecApproval {
id: "0".into(),
decision: *decision,
decision: decision.clone(),
})
.await?;
wait_for_completion(&test).await;
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ async fn run_scenario(scenario: &ScenarioSpec) -> Result<()> {
test.codex
.submit(Op::PatchApproval {
id: "0".into(),
decision: *decision,
decision: decision.clone(),
})
.await?;
wait_for_completion(&test).await;
@@ -1557,3 +1557,138 @@ async fn run_scenario(scenario: &ScenarioSpec) -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test(flavor = "current_thread")]
async fn approving_allow_prefix_persists_policy_and_skips_future_prompts() -> Result<()> {
let server = start_mock_server().await;
let approval_policy = AskForApproval::UnlessTrusted;
let sandbox_policy = SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess;
let sandbox_policy_for_config = sandbox_policy.clone();
let mut builder = test_codex().with_config(move |config| {
config.approval_policy = approval_policy;
config.sandbox_policy = sandbox_policy_for_config;
});
let test = builder.build(&server).await?;
let call_id_first = "allow-prefix-first";
let (first_event, expected_command) = ActionKind::RunCommand {
command: "printf allow-prefix-ok",
}
.prepare(&test, &server, call_id_first, false)
.await?;
let expected_command =
expected_command.expect("allow prefix scenario should produce a shell command");
let expected_allow_prefix = expected_command
.split_whitespace()
.map(ToString::to_string)
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
let _ = mount_sse_once(
&server,
sse(vec![
ev_response_created("resp-allow-prefix-1"),
first_event,
ev_completed("resp-allow-prefix-1"),
]),
)
.await;
let first_results = mount_sse_once(
&server,
sse(vec![
ev_assistant_message("msg-allow-prefix-1", "done"),
ev_completed("resp-allow-prefix-2"),
]),
)
.await;
submit_turn(
&test,
"allow-prefix-first",
approval_policy,
sandbox_policy.clone(),
)
.await?;
let approval = expect_exec_approval(&test, expected_command.as_str()).await;
assert_eq!(approval.allow_prefix, Some(expected_allow_prefix.clone()));
test.codex
.submit(Op::ExecApproval {
id: "0".into(),
decision: ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix {
allow_prefix: expected_allow_prefix.clone(),
},
})
.await?;
wait_for_completion(&test).await;
let policy_path = test.home.path().join("policy").join("default.codexpolicy");
let policy_contents = fs::read_to_string(&policy_path)?;
assert!(
policy_contents
.contains(r#"prefix_rule(pattern=["printf", "allow-prefix-ok"], decision="allow")"#),
"unexpected policy contents: {policy_contents}"
);
let first_output = parse_result(
&first_results
.single_request()
.function_call_output(call_id_first),
);
assert_eq!(first_output.exit_code.unwrap_or(0), 0);
assert!(
first_output.stdout.contains("allow-prefix-ok"),
"unexpected stdout: {}",
first_output.stdout
);
let call_id_second = "allow-prefix-second";
let (second_event, second_command) = ActionKind::RunCommand {
command: "printf allow-prefix-ok",
}
.prepare(&test, &server, call_id_second, false)
.await?;
assert_eq!(second_command.as_deref(), Some(expected_command.as_str()));
let _ = mount_sse_once(
&server,
sse(vec![
ev_response_created("resp-allow-prefix-3"),
second_event,
ev_completed("resp-allow-prefix-3"),
]),
)
.await;
let second_results = mount_sse_once(
&server,
sse(vec![
ev_assistant_message("msg-allow-prefix-2", "done"),
ev_completed("resp-allow-prefix-4"),
]),
)
.await;
submit_turn(
&test,
"allow-prefix-second",
approval_policy,
sandbox_policy.clone(),
)
.await?;
wait_for_completion_without_approval(&test).await;
let second_output = parse_result(
&second_results
.single_request()
.function_call_output(call_id_second),
);
assert_eq!(second_output.exit_code.unwrap_or(0), 0);
assert!(
second_output.stdout.contains("allow-prefix-ok"),
"unexpected stdout: {}",
second_output.stdout
);
Ok(())
}
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ async fn run_codex_tool_session_inner(
call_id,
reason: _,
risk,
allow_prefix: _,
parsed_cmd,
}) => {
handle_exec_approval_request(
+2 -2
View File
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ impl OtelEventManager {
&self,
tool_name: &str,
call_id: &str,
decision: ReviewDecision,
decision: &ReviewDecision,
source: ToolDecisionSource,
) {
tracing::event!(
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ impl OtelEventManager {
slug = %self.metadata.slug,
tool_name = %tool_name,
call_id = %call_id,
decision = %decision.to_string().to_lowercase(),
decision = %decision.clone().to_string().to_lowercase(),
source = %source.to_string(),
);
}
+4
View File
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ pub struct ExecApprovalRequestEvent {
/// Optional model-provided risk assessment describing the blocked command.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub risk: Option<SandboxCommandAssessment>,
/// Prefix rule that can be added to the user's execpolicy to allow future runs.
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
#[ts(optional, type = "Array<string>")]
pub allow_prefix: Option<Vec<String>>,
pub parsed_cmd: Vec<ParsedCommand>,
}
+5 -3
View File
@@ -1646,14 +1646,16 @@ pub struct SessionConfiguredEvent {
}
/// User's decision in response to an ExecApprovalRequest.
#[derive(
Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, Display, JsonSchema, TS,
)]
#[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq, Eq, Display, JsonSchema, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
pub enum ReviewDecision {
/// User has approved this command and the agent should execute it.
Approved,
/// User has approved this command and wants to add the command prefix to
/// the execpolicy allow list so future matching commands are permitted.
ApprovedAllowPrefix { allow_prefix: Vec<String> },
/// User has approved this command and wants to automatically approve any
/// future identical instances (`command` and `cwd` match exactly) for the
/// remainder of the session.
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ pub(crate) enum ApprovalRequest {
command: Vec<String>,
reason: Option<String>,
risk: Option<SandboxCommandAssessment>,
allow_prefix: Option<Vec<String>>,
},
ApplyPatch {
id: String,
@@ -104,8 +105,8 @@ impl ApprovalOverlay {
header: Box<dyn Renderable>,
) -> (Vec<ApprovalOption>, SelectionViewParams) {
let (options, title) = match &variant {
ApprovalVariant::Exec { .. } => (
exec_options(),
ApprovalVariant::Exec { allow_prefix, .. } => (
exec_options(allow_prefix.clone()),
"Would you like to run the following command?".to_string(),
),
ApprovalVariant::ApplyPatch { .. } => (
@@ -160,12 +161,12 @@ impl ApprovalOverlay {
return;
};
if let Some(variant) = self.current_variant.as_ref() {
match (&variant, &option.decision) {
(ApprovalVariant::Exec { id, command }, ApprovalDecision::Review(decision)) => {
self.handle_exec_decision(id, command, *decision);
match (variant, &option.decision) {
(ApprovalVariant::Exec { id, command, .. }, ApprovalDecision::Review(decision)) => {
self.handle_exec_decision(id, command, decision.clone());
}
(ApprovalVariant::ApplyPatch { id, .. }, ApprovalDecision::Review(decision)) => {
self.handle_patch_decision(id, *decision);
self.handle_patch_decision(id, decision.clone());
}
(
ApprovalVariant::McpElicitation {
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ impl ApprovalOverlay {
}
fn handle_exec_decision(&self, id: &str, command: &[String], decision: ReviewDecision) {
let cell = history_cell::new_approval_decision_cell(command.to_vec(), decision);
let cell = history_cell::new_approval_decision_cell(command.to_vec(), decision.clone());
self.app_event_tx.send(AppEvent::InsertHistoryCell(cell));
self.app_event_tx.send(AppEvent::CodexOp(Op::ExecApproval {
id: id.to_string(),
@@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ impl BottomPaneView for ApprovalOverlay {
&& let Some(variant) = self.current_variant.as_ref()
{
match &variant {
ApprovalVariant::Exec { id, command } => {
ApprovalVariant::Exec { id, command, .. } => {
self.handle_exec_decision(id, command, ReviewDecision::Abort);
}
ApprovalVariant::ApplyPatch { id, .. } => {
@@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ impl From<ApprovalRequest> for ApprovalRequestState {
command,
reason,
risk,
allow_prefix,
} => {
let reason = reason.filter(|item| !item.is_empty());
let has_reason = reason.is_some();
@@ -355,7 +357,11 @@ impl From<ApprovalRequest> for ApprovalRequestState {
}
header.extend(full_cmd_lines);
Self {
variant: ApprovalVariant::Exec { id, command },
variant: ApprovalVariant::Exec {
id,
command,
allow_prefix,
},
header: Box::new(Paragraph::new(header).wrap(Wrap { trim: false })),
}
}
@@ -431,6 +437,7 @@ enum ApprovalVariant {
Exec {
id: String,
command: Vec<String>,
allow_prefix: Option<Vec<String>>,
},
ApplyPatch {
id: String,
@@ -463,7 +470,7 @@ impl ApprovalOption {
}
}
fn exec_options() -> Vec<ApprovalOption> {
fn exec_options(allow_prefix: Option<Vec<String>>) -> Vec<ApprovalOption> {
vec![
ApprovalOption {
label: "Yes, proceed".to_string(),
@@ -472,18 +479,28 @@ fn exec_options() -> Vec<ApprovalOption> {
additional_shortcuts: vec![key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Char('y'))],
},
ApprovalOption {
label: "Yes, and don't ask again for this command".to_string(),
label: "Yes, and don't ask again this session".to_string(),
decision: ApprovalDecision::Review(ReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession),
display_shortcut: None,
additional_shortcuts: vec![key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Char('a'))],
},
ApprovalOption {
label: "No, and tell Codex what to do differently".to_string(),
decision: ApprovalDecision::Review(ReviewDecision::Abort),
display_shortcut: Some(key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Esc)),
additional_shortcuts: vec![key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Char('n'))],
},
]
.into_iter()
.chain(allow_prefix.map(|prefix| ApprovalOption {
label: "Yes, and don't ask again for commands with this prefix".to_string(),
decision: ApprovalDecision::Review(ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix {
allow_prefix: prefix,
}),
display_shortcut: None,
additional_shortcuts: vec![key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Char('p'))],
}))
.chain([ApprovalOption {
label: "No, and tell Codex what to do differently".to_string(),
decision: ApprovalDecision::Review(ReviewDecision::Abort),
display_shortcut: Some(key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Esc)),
additional_shortcuts: vec![key_hint::plain(KeyCode::Char('n'))],
}])
.collect()
}
fn patch_options() -> Vec<ApprovalOption> {
@@ -539,6 +556,7 @@ mod tests {
command: vec!["echo".to_string(), "hi".to_string()],
reason: Some("reason".to_string()),
risk: None,
allow_prefix: None,
}
}
@@ -571,6 +589,40 @@ mod tests {
assert!(saw_op, "expected approval decision to emit an op");
}
#[test]
fn exec_prefix_option_emits_allow_prefix() {
let (tx, mut rx) = unbounded_channel::<AppEvent>();
let tx = AppEventSender::new(tx);
let mut view = ApprovalOverlay::new(
ApprovalRequest::Exec {
id: "test".to_string(),
command: vec!["echo".to_string()],
reason: None,
risk: None,
allow_prefix: Some(vec!["echo".to_string()]),
},
tx,
);
view.handle_key_event(KeyEvent::new(KeyCode::Char('p'), KeyModifiers::NONE));
let mut saw_op = false;
while let Ok(ev) = rx.try_recv() {
if let AppEvent::CodexOp(Op::ExecApproval { decision, .. }) = ev {
assert_eq!(
decision,
ReviewDecision::ApprovedAllowPrefix {
allow_prefix: vec!["echo".to_string()]
}
);
saw_op = true;
break;
}
}
assert!(
saw_op,
"expected approval decision to emit an op with allow prefix"
);
}
#[test]
fn header_includes_command_snippet() {
let (tx, _rx) = unbounded_channel::<AppEvent>();
@@ -581,6 +633,7 @@ mod tests {
command,
reason: None,
risk: None,
allow_prefix: None,
};
let view = ApprovalOverlay::new(exec_request, tx);
+1
View File
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ mod tests {
command: vec!["echo".into(), "ok".into()],
reason: None,
risk: None,
allow_prefix: None,
}
}
+1
View File
@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ impl ChatWidget {
command: ev.command,
reason: ev.reason,
risk: ev.risk,
allow_prefix: ev.allow_prefix,
};
self.bottom_pane.push_approval_request(request);
self.request_redraw();
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ expression: terminal.backend().vt100().screen().contents()
$ echo hello world
› 1. Yes, proceed (y)
2. Yes, and don't ask again for this command (a)
3. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc)
2. Yes, and don't ask again this session (a)
3. Yes, and don't ask again for commands with this prefix (p)
4. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc)
Press enter to confirm or esc to cancel
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ expression: terminal.backend().vt100().screen().contents()
$ echo hello world
› 1. Yes, proceed (y)
2. Yes, and don't ask again for this command (a)
3. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc)
2. Yes, and don't ask again this session (a)
3. Yes, and don't ask again for commands with this prefix (p)
4. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc)
Press enter to confirm or esc to cancel
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Buffer {
" $ echo hello world ",
" ",
"› 1. Yes, proceed (y) ",
" 2. Yes, and don't ask again for this command (a) ",
" 2. Yes, and don't ask again this session (a) ",
" 3. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc) ",
" ",
" Press enter to confirm or esc to cancel ",
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ Buffer {
x: 7, y: 5, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: NONE,
x: 0, y: 9, fg: Cyan, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: BOLD,
x: 21, y: 9, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: NONE,
x: 48, y: 10, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: DIM,
x: 49, y: 10, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: NONE,
x: 44, y: 10, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: DIM,
x: 45, y: 10, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: NONE,
x: 48, y: 11, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: DIM,
x: 51, y: 11, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: NONE,
x: 2, y: 13, fg: Reset, bg: Reset, underline: Reset, modifier: DIM,
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
---
source: tui/src/chatwidget/tests.rs
assertion_line: 1548
expression: terminal.backend()
---
" "
@@ -13,7 +12,8 @@ expression: terminal.backend()
" $ echo 'hello world' "
" "
"› 1. Yes, proceed (y) "
" 2. Yes, and don't ask again for this command (a) "
" 3. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc) "
" 2. Yes, and don't ask again this session (a) "
" 3. Yes, and don't ask again for commands with this prefix (p) "
" 4. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc) "
" "
" Press enter to confirm or esc to cancel "
+6
View File
@@ -677,6 +677,7 @@ fn exec_approval_emits_proposed_command_and_decision_history() {
"this is a test reason such as one that would be produced by the model".into(),
),
risk: None,
allow_prefix: None,
parsed_cmd: vec![],
};
chat.handle_codex_event(Event {
@@ -721,6 +722,7 @@ fn exec_approval_decision_truncates_multiline_and_long_commands() {
"this is a test reason such as one that would be produced by the model".into(),
),
risk: None,
allow_prefix: None,
parsed_cmd: vec![],
};
chat.handle_codex_event(Event {
@@ -771,6 +773,7 @@ fn exec_approval_decision_truncates_multiline_and_long_commands() {
cwd: std::env::current_dir().unwrap_or_else(|_| PathBuf::from(".")),
reason: None,
risk: None,
allow_prefix: None,
parsed_cmd: vec![],
};
chat.handle_codex_event(Event {
@@ -1969,6 +1972,7 @@ fn approval_modal_exec_snapshot() {
"this is a test reason such as one that would be produced by the model".into(),
),
risk: None,
allow_prefix: Some(vec!["echo".into(), "hello".into(), "world".into()]),
parsed_cmd: vec![],
};
chat.handle_codex_event(Event {
@@ -2015,6 +2019,7 @@ fn approval_modal_exec_without_reason_snapshot() {
cwd: std::env::current_dir().unwrap_or_else(|_| PathBuf::from(".")),
reason: None,
risk: None,
allow_prefix: Some(vec!["echo".into(), "hello".into(), "world".into()]),
parsed_cmd: vec![],
};
chat.handle_codex_event(Event {
@@ -2228,6 +2233,7 @@ fn status_widget_and_approval_modal_snapshot() {
"this is a test reason such as one that would be produced by the model".into(),
),
risk: None,
allow_prefix: Some(vec!["echo".into(), "hello world".into()]),
parsed_cmd: vec![],
};
chat.handle_codex_event(Event {
+13
View File
@@ -408,6 +408,19 @@ pub fn new_approval_decision_cell(
],
)
}
ApprovedAllowPrefix { .. } => {
let snippet = Span::from(exec_snippet(&command)).dim();
(
"✔ ".green(),
vec![
"You ".into(),
"approved".bold(),
" codex to run ".into(),
snippet,
" and added its prefix to your allow list".bold(),
],
)
}
ApprovedForSession => {
let snippet = Span::from(exec_snippet(&command)).dim();
(
+1 -1
View File
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ metadata above):
- `codex.tool_decision`
- `tool_name`
- `call_id`
- `decision` (`approved`, `approved_for_session`, `denied`, or `abort`)
- `decision` (`approved`, `approved_allow_prefix`, `approved_for_session`, `denied`, or `abort`)
- `source` (`config` or `user`)
- `codex.tool_result`
- `tool_name`