The reward preimage is static and published in every block header, so two nodes sharing one are publicly and permanently identifiable as the same operator. That silently defeats the point of running nodes at separate sites, so the inner_hash moves out of a single env: value and into the deploy-node matrix, one per host, alongside the miners each node serves. doc/wormhole-rewards.md records the derivation chain (secret -> Poseidon2(salt|secret) = inner_hash -> Poseidon2(inner_hash) = address) with source citations, and the analysis: publishing the inner_hash is not a theft risk because spending needs a plonky2 proof of knowledge of the secret, but it does make mining income permanently attributable. The privacy in this design is at the exit, not at receipt, which is not what MINING.md's wording suggests. It also records the operational flaw: the inner_hash cannot be derived from any public material and the Android wallet does not expose it, so a seed phrase must reach some machine to produce a value that is public anyway. Mitigation is a dedicated mining wallet, not carefulness.
quantus
Deployment for a Quantus Network Planck node and its external GPU miner.
Two components, two hosts:
| Component | Host | Role |
|---|---|---|
quantus-node |
bob.hanzalova.internal |
consensus, P2P, reward address. Disk + network bound. |
quantus-miner |
benjy.hanzalova.internal |
Poseidon2-over-Goldilocks search on 1× RTX 4090. Pure GPU compute. |
They are split deliberately. Setting --miner-listen-port on the node
disables its built-in CPU mining, so the node authors nothing unless an
external miner is connected — the split is not optional once that flag is set.
The miner connects out to the node over QUIC/9833 and listens on nothing but a
loopback metrics port.
Conventions: ~/git/architecture — generic.md for the on-host shape,
deployment-gitea-actions.md for the deploy mechanism. Deviations are listed
below.
Why GPU, and why only these hosts
The proof-of-work is Poseidon2 over the Goldilocks field (p = 2⁶⁴ − 2³² + 1),
width 12, 4 external + 22 internal rounds — an arithmetic hash, not a bit-mixing
one. Cost is dominated by 64-bit modular multiplication, the state lives entirely
in registers, and there is no memory hardness at all. Measured on this fleet:
| Hardware | Hashrate | Power | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
RTX 5090 (beast, ×2) |
368 MH/s each | 600 W | 0.60 MH/s/W |
| RTX 5090 @ 400 W floor | 281 MH/s | 400 W | 0.70 MH/s/W |
RTX 4090 (benjy) |
183 MH/s | 450 W | 0.41 MH/s/W |
| Ryzen 9 9950X3D, 32t | 4.15 MH/s | — | — |
Xeon E5-2620 v3, 12t (bob) |
0.50 MH/s | — | — |
A single 5090 at its minimum power limit out-hashes every CPU in the fleet
combined by roughly 24×. CPU mining is therefore disabled everywhere
(--cpu-workers 0), including on the GPU hosts, where it would add ~1% hashrate
for a couple hundred watts. The old Xeons are node-capable and mining-worthless.
GPU/CPU parity is verified upstream (engine-gpu's gpu_cpu_parity example,
25/25 jobs) — the GPU is doing real work, not advancing a lying counter.
Ports
Registered in ~/git/architecture/port-allocations.md §5.
| Port | Proto | Component | Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
30333 |
tcp | node P2P (libp2p) | public — named firewalld service |
9833 |
udp | node ← miner control channel | mesh, firewalld rich rule scoped to the miner host only |
9615 |
tcp | node Prometheus | loopback |
9900 |
tcp | miner Prometheus | loopback |
Deviation from port-allocations.md §3: these are upstream protocol
defaults, not numbers derived from the service name. 30333 is the chain's
well-known P2P port and changing it buys nothing; 9833 is the miner protocol's
default and both ends must agree. They are recorded in the registry, which is
what the doc says actually prevents collisions. Neither lands in the crowded
alt-HTTP cluster.
The miner link gets a rich rule rather than a plain --add-service because the
fleet uses a single default zone (generic.md §9): adding the service outright
would publish 9833/udp on every address the host carries, and upstream is
explicit that this port must never face the internet.
Secrets, and one thing that only looks like one
| Name | What | Where |
|---|---|---|
RSYNC_SSH_KEY |
the shared fleet runner key | Gitea secret — already exists, do not rotate |
inner_hash |
32-byte wormhole preimage, one per node host | workflow deploy-node matrix — public, not a secret |
The inner_hash is not secret. The node embeds it verbatim in the
PreRuntime digest of every block it authors
(client/consensus/qpow/src/lib.rs:726), and the mining-rewards pallet reads
that digest back and derives the payout address on-chain. It is published from
your first mined block onward, so it is configuration, and it lives in the
deploy-node matrix with the other infra truth.
One inner_hash per host — never share one. The value is static (derived per wallet, not per block), so two nodes carrying the same inner_hash are publicly and permanently identifiable as the same operator, which collapses the independence that running nodes at separate sites is supposed to provide. The matrix carries one per entry for that reason.
Publishing it is not a theft risk — spending needs a plonky2 proof of knowledge
of the underlying secret, and recovering that from the inner_hash means
inverting Poseidon2. But it does make mining income permanently attributable:
the privacy in this design is at the exit, not at receipt. The full analysis,
with source citations, is in doc/wormhole-rewards.md.
That on-chain derivation is also why the node wants a preimage rather than an
address: the runtime does the deriving, which is what proves the payout target
is a canonical wormhole address rather than an arbitrary account. Passing an
address would give the runtime nothing to verify. --rewards-inner-hash that
isn't a canonical Poseidon digest is rejected at startup.
Knowing the preimage does not let anyone spend the rewards — spending authority is the wallet key, which never goes near this fleet. Deriving an inner_hash for a wallet you already control is a one-time offline step, done where the seed already lives:
quantus-node key quantus --scheme wormhole --words < mnemonic.txt
The binary refuses --words/--seed as command-line arguments, since argv is
world-readable and lands in shell history and audit logs. Nothing in this repo
needs, wants, or accepts a seed phrase.
The miner's credentials — miner-auth-token and miner-tls-cert-sha256 — are
genuine secrets, and are the only ones here. The node generates them on first
start and regenerates them if its base-path is wiped, so the deploy copies them
from node to miner on every run. That makes the pairing self-healing instead of
a silent auth failure six months later.
Usage
One-time, from a workstation with sudo ssh to the targets:
./script/infra-setup.sh --pubkey ~/.ssh/id_gitea_ci.pub
Then set each node's inner_hash in the deploy-node matrix. Derive one per
host, offline, from a dedicated mining wallet — see
doc/wormhole-rewards.md §6 for why that matters more than being careful.
Then push to main, or run the deploy workflow from the Actions UI. It has
two modes:
- deploy (default, and what a push does) — apply, then validate.
- validate — check only, change nothing. Asserts each unit is active, the
installed binary matches the pinned version, the node's P2P and miner ports
are listening, peers are connected, the GPU is enumerated and drawing power,
and
miner_hashes_totalis advancing.
systemctl is-active alone is not evidence this stack works: a miner that found
no GPU adapter, and a node that is authoring nothing because no miner is
attached, both look perfectly healthy to systemd. Hence the counter check.
Upgrades are deliberate — bump NODE_VERSION / MINER_VERSION in the workflow.
There is no auto-update on a validator on purpose.
Known conflict: helexa on benjy ⚠️
benjy already runs helexa neuron on :13131 (architecture/generic.md
§11, inference.md), serving inference from the same RTX 4090 this miner will
saturate. They will contend directly: the miner drives the GPU to ~95%
utilisation and ~450 W continuously, which will make inference latency on benjy
by turns awful and unpredictable.
Nothing here resolves that, and the deploy does not try to arbitrate. Options, in rough order of preference:
- Move mining to
beast(2× 5090, and 4× the hashrate) and leave benjy to inference. Requires checking what beast's neuron is doing first. - Make the miner yield —
--gpu-throttle-ms, or anExecConditionthat refuses to start while a model is loaded. - Accept the contention on benjy and treat inference there as best-effort.
Decide before enabling quantus-miner.service on benjy, not after.
Deviations from house convention
runs-on: infra, notfedora-43.gitea-runners.md§4 says a deploy needs only ssh + rsync and so fitsfedora-43. That is about tooling, not routing — these targets are mesh-only.internalnames, andlair/mail's two working deploys both useinfrafor that reason. Revisit if the fedora runners gain mesh reachability.- Upstream protocol ports rather than derived ones — see Ports above.
MemoryDenyWriteExecute=falseon the node (Substrate JITs its wasm runtime through wasmtime) andPrivateDevices=falseon the miner (needs/dev/nvidia*). Both are annotated in the unit files; neither is tidy-up-able.Type=simple, notnotify—quantus-nodedoes notsd_notify(READY=1).- No Rust workspace. This repo deploys upstream release binaries; there is
nothing to build, so
generic.md§1–§2 do not apply.
Upstream
- node — https://github.com/Quantus-Network/chain (
MINING.mdis the real doc) - miner — https://github.com/Quantus-Network/quantus-miner
- guide — https://docs.quantus.com/guides/mining
Note that Planck is a testnet: "tokens have no monetary value". Mainnet difficulty and reward schedule are unpublished, so no profitability claim here is possible yet. Also worth tracking: this PoW has no memory hardness and a small fixed state, which makes it an unusually clean FPGA/ASIC target — relevant to any decision to buy hardware for it.