23 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
82a4ac9c59 feat(api): wormhole deposits by recipient
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 8m40s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 18s
GET /v1/chains/{chain}/wormhole/deposits?to=<addr>,…&after=<h>:<i>&limit=<n>

Every Wormhole::NativeTransferred to up to 100 addresses (SS58 or 0x hex),
oldest first, with a height:event_index cursor. A deposit carries its
recipient, its amount as a decimal string, its transfer_count and its
leaf_index: what a wallet needs to work out what it can still spend.

A wormhole address's System::Account balance is a receipt total. An exit
credits the exit account and records a nullifier, and never debits the
wormhole address. A deposit is spent when the nullifier its secret and
transfer_count derive is used. The wallet computes and checks that itself;
nothing here asks for nullifiers, because naming one pairs a deposit with its
exit.

This is for the Quantus extension's wormhole balance (quantus/extension#14),
which would otherwise ask Quantus's Subsquid and tell Quantus which addresses
are one person's.

- The query reads chain_event through the accounts GIN index, then keeps only
  rows whose `to` is one of the addresses: accounts holds the sender too, and
  a transfer from a wormhole address is not a deposit to it.
- The response carries indexed_from/indexed_to. On a chain still backfilling,
  a client can't take the sum as a balance without checking it against
  Wormhole::TransferCount.
- CORS on this route alone allows any origin, GET only, merged outside the
  site's allowlist so that allowlist can never answer a preflight for it.
  Extension origins can't be listed (Chrome ids vary by install, Firefox's are
  random per install), and the data is public.

The integration test covers the ways this is silently wrong: a deposit from an
address counted as one to it, another event kind leaking in, a cursor that
skips a same-block sibling, and another chain's rows. Unit tests cover both
address spellings, the cursor, and u128 amounts written as strings.

Closes #22

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012uDUodEcRbBwNRi3UCmw8f
2026-09-16 17:07:48 +03:00
864a76ffb6 feat(ui): show what goes into the wormhole and what comes out
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m33s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 6s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 15s
The wormhole page counted the pool but never drew the flow through it. It now
leads with a meter — 42% of every note ever created is still unspent — and a
per-day chart of value arriving against value leaving.

Direction is read from the producing extrinsic, never from the sender, which
is the same sentinel whichever way the value is going: anything settled by
`verify_public_batch` or `verify_private_batch` is leaving, everything else is
arriving. `entered + left` reconciles to the day's total exactly.

**The chart is diverging with a single hue.** In and out want two hues either
side of a neutral midpoint, and this site has one data colour. The two-shade
alternative was measured rather than assumed and fails outright — `#bd8829`
against `#e0a63a` scores a normal-vision ΔE of 9.9, under the 15 floor. So
direction is carried by which side of the zero rule a bar sits on, which
survives greyscale, print, forced-colors and every form of colour vision, and
leaves no categorical pair to validate.

Rendering it is what found the rest. Same hue plus touching bars drew one
continuous mark through the rule and the encoding disappeared, so a surface gap
is held open at zero. Five days across a full-width panel drew 170px slabs, so
bar width is capped and the columns space out instead. And `rx` rounds all four
corners of a rect, so bars read as detached lozenges until they became paths
with rounded data-ends only.

Ships with the hover layer, direct labels on the busiest day each way, and a
visually-hidden table so the series exists outside the picture.

Refs #17

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 12:06:57 +03:00
f81ebd4746 feat: who the wormhole exits pay, and how much of it is the protocol itself
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m37s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 16s
The premise was that pools are the best surface for observing wormhole
transfers, because payouts must leave a pattern in the batches. The pattern
is there. Most of it is not payouts.

Two things break the obvious reading. Batch *size* is aggregation: the pallet
documents a public batch as one segment per inner private batch and a segment
as one client, so a 120-output batch is an aggregator bundling unrelated
people. And the most recurrent recipient is the aggregator itself — one
address is credited in 91.5% of every public batch anyone submitted and in
none of the private ones, which is the rebate minted to the proof's
`aggregator_address`. QUANPOOL's mining address appears in 501 batches for
7.54 QTC total, 0.015 each: the fee share paid to whoever included the batch.

Classified, three addresses take 76% of everything the exits pay. A cohort
table that did not say so would be describing aggregator plumbing and calling
it an economy, so the share is the section's eyebrow and its first sentence.

What survives the subtraction is the finding worth shipping: among genuine
recipients, 35 addresses paid twenty or more times take two thirds of the
remaining value at twice everyone else's average credit. That is a
recurring-payment shape and the page says it is no more than that — the chain
records no sender, so a regular payee is as plausibly an exchange deposit or
one person on a schedule as a pool meeting its obligations.

Batch size is not rendered anywhere, on purpose.

Closes #20

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 11:49:48 +03:00
e3c95d4945 feat: a wormhole page — what enters, what leaves, what is still inside
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m33s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 17s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
The observer had nothing to say about this chain's central feature, which is
why the distribution table's outflow column could ship reading zero for every
miner and look like evidence.

A transfer inserts a commitment as a note; spending one proves a nullifier,
which the runtime records so it cannot be spent twice. That makes the pool
countable even though its movements are not:

    ZkTree::LeafCount           82,691   notes created
    Wormhole::UsedNullifiers    47,796   notes spent
    outstanding                 34,895   unspent — still inside

Outstanding is the headline. It is the part of the chain's activity that has not
moved, and every one of those notes will name a recipient and an amount and not
a sender when it does.

The routes table separates transfers by the extrinsic that produced them,
because a hidden sender means two different things. In block initialisation it
is the chain paying a miner and the "sender" is the runtime; inside
`verify_public_batch` or `verify_private_batch` it is somebody spending a note
and the origin genuinely is not recorded. Collapsing those would make mining
rewards look like anonymous payments — 23,876 of them.

Notes per day come from the `leaf_index` each transfer carries rather than from
`ZkTree::LeafInserted`, which is in `SKIPPED_EVENTS` because it fires every block
and names no account. Same fact, cheaper road.

`SegmentsDenied` and `ExitMintFailed` have never fired. Shown anyway, because a
proof rejection nobody has ever seen is a finding rather than a gap — though it
is a weaker statement than it looks, and the note says so: never refused is not
the same as never attempted.

Closes #18

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 09:32:27 +03:00
06f3ece228 feat: account flows, and a distribution table for mining rewards
Reported concern: one pool's balance is disproportionately large, and it is not
clear whether rewards are reaching miners. This makes the question answerable
from the chain rather than from impressions.

Measured on mainnet while building it, blocks 1–42,274:

    account            mined   received     sent  recipients
    QUANPOOL          10,171      5,207        0           0
    qzomrwjT…              0     11,382    4,071          90
    qzo1Pr3X…              0      3,875    7,528         986
    qzo4QjZz…              0      1,257    2,448         742
    qznbesUc…              0      1,600        0           0

Direction comes from each transfer event's own `from` and `to` — `Wormhole::
NativeTransferred` and `Balances::Transfer` both carry them — so every figure is
something the chain recorded.

**A nonce cannot answer this, and reaching for one is the obvious mistake.**
Wormhole transfers dispatch unsigned: `verify_private_batch` and
`verify_public_batch` have no signer at all. An address here can move a fortune
with a nonce of zero, and I nearly reported one as proof that nothing had ever
been sent.

The presentation reports flows and does not judge them, because the data cannot
settle what they mean. Two facts in the table above are why: several large
accounts send nothing — ordinary for a solo miner keeping what it earned — and
the accounts distributing to hundreds of recipients have never mined a block, so
payout wallets here are funded from somewhere other than mining addresses. There
is also no such thing as a "pool" on this chain: the word appears only in a name
its operator reports over telemetry, which `MinerFlow::attribution` carries so a
reader can weigh it.

What earns the feature its place is comparison. One miner's recipient count says
little; beside its neighbours' it says a great deal, and the reader draws the
conclusion rather than the site.

Refs #17

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-14 08:59:55 +03:00
aaf37baaca feat: a network page — supply, capability and daily activity
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m27s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 17s
The site answered "who is mining" thoroughly and "what is this economy doing"
not at all. Everything needed was already reachable and none of it was
assembled anywhere.

Measured against mainnet rather than assumed:

    total issuance      5,682,913.17 QTC
    endowed at genesis  5,670,000.00 QTC
    mined since          12,913.17 QTC   <- emission to date, printed nowhere else
    accounts                    1,925    counted, not inferred from indexed events
    locks/holds/freezes/reserves    0    all four, counted
    vesting schedules              48
    referenda                       0
    reversible transfers            0
    calls used                 7 of 58
    events fired              18 of 107

**No "circulating supply" field, deliberately.** With every immobilising map
empty it would equal total issuance exactly, and printing it as a separate
headline would assert a distinction this chain does not currently make. The page
states what was counted and lets that be read. Vesting is a count rather than a
sum for the same reason: this runtime's vesting does not touch the balances
locks, so what it holds and when it releases would be a guess.

**Signed extrinsics are separated from the total**, because three quarters of
this chain's extrinsics are inherents — 513 signed of 2,052 on the day measured
— and a single "transactions per day" line would be mostly clockwork, a number
that reads as adoption and is not.

Two kinds of certainty share the page and are kept apart. Supply and the map
sizes are chain state, read now. The daily activity is our index, and the
Activity panel prints the range it covered and says "the whole chain" or "a
partial index" — a chart whose axis claims a month over a week of data is the
failure this repository has already shipped twice.

One thing found while building it: a counter that has never moved is *absent*
from storage, not zero. `TechReferenda::ReferendumCount` and
`ReversibleTransfers::NextTransactionId` both read as nothing, and reporting
them unknown would have hidden the most interesting fact about them — that
governance and reversible transfers are shipped and have never been used.
`plain_value` falls back to the entry's declared default, which is only sound
because `StorageTarget` says whether it is `Default` or `Optional`.

Refs #17

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-14 08:43:13 +03:00
fac73f392c feat: a nodes index, so a node need not have mined to be visible
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m23s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 6s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 16s
Reported: `baba-gorchitsa` shows its hardware on telemetry.quantus.com and
nothing here. Not a decoding failure — we held the data. Measured, the same node
on both chains at the same moment:

    quantus  attribution=carried, 0 votes, 33 blocks   on the feed: yes
    planck   attribution=telemetry, 1 vote, 2969 blocks on the feed: no

Exactly inverted. On mainnet we had the metadata and no join to it; on Planck
the join and no node. The mainnet name is *carried* from Planck, and
`Attribution::peer_id` is `None` for anything but a telemetry attribution
because there is no node behind a carried name — that reasoning stands. The
mistake was upstream: node metadata was reachable *only* through the mining
inference, and the feed hands us every node unconditionally. 288 on mainnet, of
which a handful have ever won a block.

So `/:chain/node` lists all of them and `/:chain/node/:peer` is one, neither
gated on mining. The index merges the live feed over the cache, so a node not
re-announced since our last restart still appears, faint, with its peer count
absent rather than stale — a peer count from an hour ago is not a peer count.
Live rows sort first, then by name, and the filter matches name, peer id, CPU,
version or country, because "find my node" is the question the page exists for.

The miner panel now links to the node's own page instead of being the only way
to see it.

`reported` beside the count is the feed's own `AddedChain` figure and will not
match in either direction — 284 against 288 listed, measured, because it is a
snapshot the feed refreshes on its own cadence. Shown next to our count rather
than instead of it, since the difference is a real fact about how each was
arrived at. My first comment claimed it was "usually larger"; it was smaller the
first time I looked at it.

One trap caught in the browser rather than by the type checker: "is this the
standings?" existed three times, and adding a section updated two. The redirect
in `App` judged `/quantus/node/<peer>` to be the standings and replaced it with
`/quantus/3600-blocks` — route parsed, page existed, address bar threw it away.
It is `isStandings` now, in one place.

Closes #16

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-13 19:19:58 +03:00
28e99bee44 feat: show the node a miner's blocks were reported from
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m37s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 17s
Caches what the telemetry feed says each node *is*, and surfaces it on the miner
route: client version, target triple, CPU, cores, memory, kernel, distribution,
whether it is virtualised, country, and how long the node process has been up.

Kept in `node_telemetry`, keyed by peer id — never by the feed's `node_id`,
which is per-connection and would accumulate a row per reconnect for the same
machine. Written every five minutes rather than every thirty seconds like the
attributions beside it: a CPU does not change, and mainnet alone has nearly
three hundred nodes. The route reads the live feed first and the cache second,
so a node the feed has not re-announced since our last restart still answers.

Nulls never overwrite. The telemetry server geolocates asynchronously, so every
reconnect re-sends every node with a null location — a naive upsert would blank
the country of every node on the site for as long as the lookups took to catch
up. The guard is in the feed state and in the `on conflict` clause both, with a
test for each.

**Location is a country and no finer.** The feed sends coordinates and a city
from an IP geolocation database, and at city resolution those are wrong often
enough that showing one would assert something nobody knows.
`blackbeard_core::geo` derives the country offline from a 508 KiB boundary set —
no network call, and nothing told where these nodes are — and the coordinates
are then dropped. The schema has no city, latitude or longitude column: a column
that does not exist cannot be rendered by mistake. The lookup returns
subdivisions before countries and `GB-ENG` is exactly the precision being
avoided, so only the two-letter code survives.

**The panel wears its uncertainty in the header, not a footnote.** A miner is
joined to a node by the same first-reporter voting that gives it a display name,
so `Attribution` now carries the peer id it settled on — `None` for a preimage
or a carried name, because there is no node behind either. The heading reads
"reported by" and the confidence and vote count sit beside it. The note says the
CPU is the node's and not necessarily what is hashing: on this network the work
is on GPUs that telemetry does not report at all.

Checked against the live feed end to end, not a fixture: real frames decoded,
cached, served and rendered. One node reports an Ubuntu userspace on a Fedora
kernel, which is a container seeing its host — the panel shows that faithfully
rather than tidying it away.

Closes #15

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-13 17:26:28 +03:00
88086552cb fix: show a block's events, joined to the extrinsics that caused them
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 9m18s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 4s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 14s
The block page listed extrinsics and nothing else. Block 1 holds twenty-eight
indexed events and the route returned none of them — visible from the outside,
because an account page linked to a `Wormhole::NativeTransferred` at block 1 and
block 1 showed no sign of it.

`phase` and `extrinsic_index` were stored for exactly this join and had never
been used. Each extrinsic now carries its own events beneath it, and the block's
own events sit in their phases.

Block 1 is the argument for doing it that way. As extrinsics alone it is a
single `Timestamp::set`. Its events are the entire opening distribution:
twenty-one `Wormhole::NativeTransferred` in `Initialization`, owned by no
extrinsic at all and sent from the minting account — not block zero, and not
anything a transaction did. `Vesting::LaunchMomentSet` fires there too, so
vesting has been exercised despite the call index showing zero `Vesting::*`
dispatched: a pallet the runtime uses looks unused from the call side alone.

Closes #3

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-10 09:14:56 +03:00
1e8869e7a1 feat: index the whole event surface, and show what has never fired
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m31s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 14s
The event interest list was an allowlist of two entries, which meant every
capability the chain grew was invisible until somebody remembered to add a line
— the exact failure the metadata-oracle approach exists to avoid. It is a
denylist now.

Nothing is excluded for being unused. Whether a capability is exercised is the
question an analyst is asking: a chain that ships vesting and governance nobody
touches is telling you something, and it can only tell you that if the silence
is recorded rather than filtered on the way in. The rule for exclusion is
narrower than volume and narrower than usefulness — an event carrying no account
can never answer "everything involving this account", which is what the index is
for. Three kinds both name no account and fire every block, so they are skipped:
ZkTree::LeafInserted, QPoW::DifficultyAdjusted, System::ExtrinsicSuccess. They
render as "not indexed" rather than as a zero, because a zero reads as disuse.

Balances::Minted looked like a fourth. It fired exactly as often as
MinerRewarded across a 120-block sample and for the same reason, but it names an
account, minting is not only for miners, and showing a reward twice on one page
is a presentation problem to solve on that page rather than a reason to lose the
record. Kept.

`/:chain/event` is the call index's other half — 19 of 107 kinds fired — and
`/:chain/event/:pallet/:variant` the feed behind a row. Measured on live
mainnet the widening took the index from ~1.2 to ~3.4 rows per block and bought
739 accounts' worth of wormhole transfers that were previously invisible.

Signatures also lose their associated-type ceremony: the runtime writes
`<<T as frame_system::Config>::Lookup as StaticLookup>::Source`, which is
correct and forty characters of scaffolding around one word, and three of those
in a row pushed the counts off the side of the table. Generics are untouched —
`BalanceOf<T>` is information.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-10 07:55:19 +03:00
6b45004907 feat: the call index — declared surface against actual use
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m46s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 15s
Every explorer shows what happened on a chain. None shows the difference
between what a chain can do and what it has done, because none holds the
runtime's declared surface next to the activity. We already hold both, so this
is a join rather than new indexing.

    quantus    v152   6 of 58 dispatchables used
    heisenberg v148   6 of 58 — and a different six

The gap is the interesting half. ReversibleTransfers, TechReferenda, Vesting
and Preimage are shipped, documented and untouched; "this chain has governance
nobody has used" is a different statement from "this chain has no governance",
and only one of them appears on a list of what happened. Unused calls keep their
signature and their docs, both read from the chain rather than a source tree,
and are dimmed rather than hidden.

Two chains on the same runtime family diverging is the other thing it surfaces:
mainnet has exercised the wormhole batch verifiers and nothing else, while
Heisenberg has a whole multisig lifecycle and no wormhole traffic.

`/:chain/call/:pallet/:call` is the feed behind a row — who dispatched it, with
what arguments, and whether it worked. Nothing is written per call type: the
arguments render through the same `Payload` as everything else, so a pallet
added next year gets a row on the index when the runtime declares it and a
working page the moment somebody uses it.

`BlockExtrinsic` gained `height` and `at`, which are redundant on a block's own
page and the entire point on a feed where every row is a different block.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-10 07:44:29 +03:00
edce856263 feat: decode extrinsics, and show them
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m17s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 4s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 15s
An event is the chain's account of what happened; an extrinsic is the request
that caused it, and carries what no event does — who signed, what they called,
the nonce and tip, and whether it worked. A history built from events alone
omits every failed attempt and never names a submitter.

The same oracle does both. The metadata's extrinsic type carries four
parameters and the registry names all of them, including
`qp_dilithium_crypto::types::DilithiumSignatureScheme` — the part that looked
like it would need hand-written post-quantum knowledge and does not. The chain
describes its own signature scheme, so `decode_extrinsic` reads a Quantus
transaction without a line of code that knows Quantus exists.

Two facts about this chain's extrinsics, both now in CLAUDE.md. The first byte
is not the version: the top two bits are a type tag, and mainnet carries `0x84`
(signed, v4) and `0x05` (bare, v5) in the same block while the metadata declares
version 4 — check the byte against the metadata and you reject every timestamp
inherent on the chain. And a signature is 5.3 KiB, two orders of magnitude
larger than the call it authorises; it is decoded to find where the call begins
and then discarded, keeping only the scheme's name and the byte count.

Both halves of a block index in one pass, off calls already being made. Whether
a dispatch succeeded comes from the `ExtrinsicSuccess`/`ExtrinsicFailed` events
in that same decoded list — read, used, not stored.

The block page grows a table below the facts: call, signer, arguments, and the
signature's size. The account page merges extrinsics into the history it already
had, ordered by block with the request above the results it caused. `source` is
1 for an extrinsic and 0 for an event so that every part of the sort key
descends, which lets the paging cursor be a plain row comparison rather than a
mixed-direction one Postgres cannot express.

Nested calls are why this had to be generic. A `Utility::batch_all` carries whole
calls in its arguments, so a transfer's recipient can be three levels down — and
because the decoder collects account ids wherever they appear, that batched
transfer shows on the recipient's page tagged *received* even though they signed
nothing. Verified on mainnet 12,616: the batch renders both its transfers with
destinations and values, above the two `Balances::Transfer` events they produced.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 18:27:54 +03:00
efbe901646 feat: section indexes, so the routes can be found
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m33s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 15s
Every route added lately was reachable only by already knowing an address — a
block hash, a preimage, an SS58 string, a spec_version. Fine for a link somebody
sent you, useless for discovering the pages exist. A kind with nothing after it
is now the index of that kind, and a nav under the chain chips names them.

Not the same page three times. Blocks is the record behind the live ticker,
paged by height. Accounts ranks by tokens earned over the whole indexed record,
which is a different question from the standings' blocks-per-window and here a
different answer: difficulty rose 346-fold inside mainnet's first day, so an
early block cost a three-hundredth of a current one. Runtimes is the only list
with no other home — a block does not name its runtime and neither do the
standings.

No `/:chain/miner`: the standings already are the index of miners, and a second
page of the same rows under another address would be two answers to one
question. That path redirects there, along with anything else that resolves to
the front page without being spelled like it, so the address bar and the section
nav agree about where the reader is.

Two things caught by looking at the rendered pages:

The block index's gaps came from `observed_at` and read *three milliseconds*
between blocks on a chain targeting twelve seconds — exactly the trap CLAUDE.md
records, since a gap fill writes a whole batch within one second. They come from
`authored_at` now, the chain's own clock.

The first page of that index came from the live ticker, which is ordered
oldest-first because that is the order it is pushed in, so page one climbed and
every page after it descended. The index sends a cursor for its first page too.

Accounts shows the address beside any node name: one node legitimately reports
for several payout addresses, and the first cut had two rows reading
`pearl-prover` with nothing to tell them apart.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 18:07:11 +03:00
b006f54cd5 feat: a runtime's own page
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m12s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 14s
`/quantus/runtime/152` — every pallet, call, event, error, storage entry and
constant the runtime declares, with the constants' values decoded against their
own declared types. Nothing transcribed from a source tree: a source tree says
what the chain should be running, metadata says what it ran.

The set of runtimes is found rather than waited for. Decoding caches one the
moment it needs it, so left alone the cache is "whatever the backfill has walked
past" — days on a chain a million blocks deep. `spec_version` only increases, so
the boundaries are a sorted sequence and bisection finds each in log₂(height)
probes. On Heisenberg that turned up six runtimes and the block each took over
at: v126 from 1, v128 from 132, v131 from 342,813, v136 from 669,129, v144 from
812,055, v148 from 977,079 — two more than the four upgrade boundaries this
approach was originally verified against.

Discovery is its own task, not a poll step. `state_getRuntimeVersion` at an old
block makes the node instantiate the runtime WASM from that block's state:
~4 s against Heisenberg's endpoint versus ~0.25 s at the tip, and a hundred of
those inside a four-second loop stalls difficulty and the summary broadcast for
minutes on every start.

Reading Heisenberg's two ends side by side is the case for the page. Between
v126 and v148 the chain dropped Referenda, ConvictionVoting, Recovery, Assets
and AssetsHolder, added Vesting and Origins, gained `WeightReclaim` and moved
`ChargeTransactionPayment` after the two Quantus-specific extensions. Every one
breaks a decoder written against the other version and none is visible from a
block.

`U256`/`U512` now render as one decimal rather than four or eight little-endian
limbs, identified by registry path exactly as `AccountId32` already was.
Difficulty as `[1189189, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]` describes the bytes correctly and
tells a reader nothing. `ChainSummary` gained `spec_version`/`spec_name` so the
footer can say what the site is decoding against, and link to it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 17:45:28 +03:00
d5a286f220 feat: account pages, built on the event index
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m5s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 4s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 16s
`/quantus/account/qzp2AxZw…` answers the question the official explorer
answers badly: what an address has actually been paid, every reward, back as far
as the index has read. Everything comes from this observer's own decoding — no
subsquid, no external indexer, nothing that stops working when the node prunes
the state behind it.

There is no case per event type anywhere in this. `chain_event` gained an
`accounts` column filled by the decoder itself, which knows which values are
`AccountId32` by registry path — the same knowledge that keeps it from
rendering a block hash as an address — so "everything involving this account"
is one containment query that already covers pallets nobody has written yet.
The frontend labels what it recognises and renders anything else as its own key
and value, so a new event type shows up as itself rather than not at all.

Events also carry the block's own timestamp now. `block.authored_at` holds the
same thing but only for blocks this process was running for, and a payment
history that renders "height 412" with no date because the observer was not
alive in March is not a history.

The preimage and the address are two ends of one identity and each page now
links to the other. Address to preimage is a lookup among preimages seen, not a
calculation: the derivation runs one way.

Verified against mainnet: 13,384 reward events indexed from genesis to the tip,
quanpool's page reconciling to 3,784.98 QTC over 12,346 blocks, and transfers
rendering their counterparties as linked addresses without a line of code that
knows what a transfer is.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 17:04:45 +03:00
eb26a7bb3c feat: decode events against the runtime's own metadata
A header says who mined a block, not what they were paid: the amount is
remaining supply over an emission divisor plus fees, quantized with dust
carried forward, so only the `MinerRewarded` event knows it. Reading it means
decoding SCALE against the registry of the runtime that produced the block, and
this chain's shapes differ from vanilla Substrate because of the post-quantum
signatures.

So the chain describes itself. `state_getMetadata` at a block hash executes
`Metadata_metadata` against the runtime WASM in that block's state; the v14
registry that comes back drives a decoder that knows nothing about mining,
rewards or transfers. `INDEXED_EVENTS` is the only place a name appears —
adding transfers or anything the chain grows next is one line and a query, not
a migration, a struct and a decoder.

Metadata is cached per spec_version, because a node that starts pruning would
otherwise make history undecodable. Blocks are tried against the tip's runtime
first, which costs no extra call; `decode_events` refuses a partial read, so a
block from before an upgrade fails loudly rather than decoding into plausible
nonsense, and that failure is what asks which runtime actually produced it.

`backfill` walks outward from the tip — to the tip first, then toward genesis —
because live indexing alone leaves holes an account page would show: a restart,
an RPC blip, a gap fill that ran before the metadata was cached. Progress is a
cursor rather than `max(height)`, since a block with no indexed event and a
block never read are otherwise the same answer.

Verified on mainnet: block 13160's preimage derives, through the same Poseidon2
the chain runs, to exactly the `miner` field of its own reward event — so the
header author and the payee join with no lookup table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 16:47:10 +03:00
9eb4bee649 fix: a miner's hashrate is the work it did, not its share of today's network
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 6m31s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 4s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 14s
Reported against a Grafana panel showing roughly a sixth of what the site did.
Grafana was closer to the truth.

The estimate was `share of blocks in the window × current network hashrate`.
That is only correct while the network is the same size across the whole
window. Measured on mainnet's launch day it was nowhere near: difficulty rose
346-fold inside one 14,400-block window, from 96.4B to 33.4T. A miner that won
its blocks early — when a block cost a three-hundredth of what it costs now —
had that share multiplied by today's network. For this observer's own node the
site reported 25.4 GH/s against an actual 2.5 GH/s.

Difficulty is expected hashes per block by definition, so the difficulty of the
blocks a miner won, summed and divided by the time they spanned, is its
hashrate directly — with no reference to the network's size, and immune to that
size changing underneath, because every block carries the difficulty in force
when it was won. The observer has recorded per-block difficulty correctly since
the parent-state fix, so the data was already there.

`miner_series` had the same flaw and is fixed the same way: summed work per
bucket over the bucket's own duration.

The window's duration is taken from `authored_at`, not `observed_at`. A stretch
this process caught up on carries observation times seconds apart for blocks
minutes apart, and dividing real work by that would invent hashrate — the same
trap the history series was built to avoid.

The headline network figure is unchanged. It divides current difficulty by the
measured interval because it answers a different question: how hard is a block
to win right now, not what did this miner do over the last twelve hours. The
two no longer sum to each other, which is correct and is what the footer now
says.

`standings_rank_by_blocks_then_recency` asserted 400.0 from the old formula;
its third argument is now the window's duration, so it asserts the work-based
figure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 15:45:34 +03:00
17ad5b1f74 fix: a restart no longer empties the ticker and the hashrate
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 6m30s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 15s
Reported from the live site: the network hashrate occasionally drops to a
fraction of what it was, the live blocks table truncates to a single row and
rebuilds, and the cycle repeats on an unclear schedule.

The schedule is `blackbeard-api-cert.path`. It watches the host certificate and
runs `systemctl restart blackbeard-api` when it rotates — four times in the
last day, on top of every deploy. Nothing was crashing; `NRestarts` is 0.

What a restart lost was two pieces of memory-only state. The block ticker is
built from live blocks and has no other source, so it came back with one row
and refilled over the next minute. The tip samples behind the measured interval
were dropped outright, because the window replay pushes every row with
`at_tip: false` — correct for blocks a previous process caught up on, wrong for
the ones it genuinely watched arrive, which the `at_tip` column has recorded
since `0002`. Without them `measured_interval` returns `None` and the hashrate
falls back to the configured target: at mainnet's ~1.5s against a 12s target,
an eight-fold drop, correctly labelled nominal and wrong.

Warm start now restores both. It runs after the attributions and carried names
because the ticker rows need their display names. Restored tip samples are
capped at ten minutes old — the interval stays arithmetically valid across a
gap, since blocks kept being produced and both terms grow together, but it
stops being *current*, and a sample from an hour ago averaged with one from now
describes the hour rather than the tip.

The underlying restart is left alone: it is a certificate-rotation safeguard
and not mine to remove. It is now simply not visible, which is what it should
always have been — and worth noting the store already recycles pooled
connections hourly for exactly that rotation, so the restart is belt-and-braces
over a case already handled.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 15:21:25 +03:00
ffcfb79cab feat(attribution): carry a miner's name across chains by reward preimage
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 7m6s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 14s
Live telemetry names the miners who win often and leaves everyone else as a
hex string. Measured on mainnet: of 22 miners, 2 were named and 14 had no name
available anywhere — but 6 already had one on Planck, under the same reward
preimage. Those 6 are exactly the small operators the naming is worst for,
because a name needs a block whose first reporter the feed could separate and
they win few blocks.

The preimage is derived from a secret only its owner holds, so the same
preimage on two chains is the same operator. That is an inference the site can
stand behind, unlike guessing from timing — and it is the only lever that works
without waiting on the feed at all.

It is a separate `AttributionSource` and renders as one. `Carried` names carry
no confidence and no votes, because they assert nothing about this chain: only
that this is who the operator was last known to be. Any live attribution here
outranks one, and the row shows an `elsewhere` chip rather than the telemetry
`node` chip so the two can never be read as the same claim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-09 14:59:29 +03:00
53dac3717b feat: block explorer routes, addressed by hash
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 6m33s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 5s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 16s
`#/:chain/:height` opens a block and then rewrites the address to
`#/:chain/:hash`. The redirect is the point, not tidiness: `block` is keyed on
(chain, height) and a reorg overwrites, so a height names a *position* and a
link to one comes to mean a different block the moment the chain forks there. A
hash names one block for good — including after it has lost, which is the only
way an orphan is linkable at all.

`GET /v1/chains/{chain}/blocks/{ref}` takes either spelling; a decimal number
and 32 bytes of hex cannot be confused, so a caller holding a number is not made
to guess which one this API wanted. The same reasoning puts block refs in the
second path segment beside the window: no window name is all digits or 0x plus
64 hex characters.

The answer is assembled from two sources because neither is sufficient, and
they fail at different times:

- The node holds the block and forgets it. Non-canonical bodies go once finality
  passes them (blocks-pruning defaults to archive-canonical, and Planck finalises
  ~100 blocks back), and difficulty is a state read behind a 256-block default.
- The observer holds what the node never had — when the block was seen, whether
  that sighting was at the tip — and what it has since forgotten: the difficulty
  read while the state behind it still existed.

So resolution degrades in a stated order rather than failing. Node first; a
header it cannot serve falls back to `block_displacement`, which is what makes
an orphan describable at all; a node that is away falls back to the recorded
row. `from_node` tells the reader which they are looking at, and every value
neither source has is spelled out in words — "the body is pruned", "this
observer never saw this block" — because a blank on a block page reads as zero.

Verified against the live chain: a tip block carries difficulty, one extrinsic,
a 1.9 s gap and 473 ms of propagation; height 1000000 keeps its body and loses
difficulty to state pruning; genesis has no author digest and does not panic; a
seeded displacement serves as an orphan with the winner linked, and the winner
lists it in `also_seen`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-08 16:30:41 +03:00
0ce58094e4 feat(data): record what a reorg displaced
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 6m31s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 6s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 18s
`block` is keyed on (chain, height) so a replacement overwrites rather than
accumulates — a schema keyed on the hash would inflate the losing fork's author
forever. The cost is that the losing block vanishes without a trace, and with it
any record that the height was ever contested. `block_displacement` is that
trace: one row per displacement, holding the whole row that was about to be
overwritten.

It cannot be reconstructed later. `blocks-pruning` defaults to
archive-canonical, which discards non-canonical bodies once finality passes them
— about a hundred blocks behind the tip on Planck — and difficulty is a state
read against a 256-block default. Minutes after a reorg the chain itself can no
longer answer for the block, so what is captured at the moment of the swap is
all there will ever be. That is why the row holds the author and the difficulty
rather than just the hash: the author is the interesting field, it says who lost
the race, and it costs a table that gains a row only when the chain forks.

The capture is a CTE ahead of the upsert, in the same statement. Every
data-modifying CTE sees the same snapshot, so it reads the pre-update row even
though the insert below it is replacing that row in the same breath, and a
failure rolls back both — which two statements without a transaction would not.
A trigger would do the same thing invisibly to anyone reading the query.

Nothing reads the table yet, deliberately. The read shape belongs with the
block route that will use it; what matters now is that the history exists by
the time that lands, which it cannot do retroactively.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-08 15:55:07 +03:00
7e5c2de936 feat: sparkline history under the headline tiles
All checks were successful
deploy / build (push) Successful in 6m36s
deploy / deploy-web (push) Successful in 6s
deploy / deploy-api (push) Successful in 16s
Adds `GET /v1/chains/{chain}/series` and a sparkline under network hashrate,
difficulty, block time and miners. Height gets none — it only goes up, and a
straight diagonal reports nothing.

The chart is bucketed by height, not by time: every point is the same number of
blocks, so every point carries equal statistical weight and a stretch nobody
recorded stays the same width on the axis as one that was. A bucket is the
window over fifty, which makes a full window exactly fifty buckets — that is
what lets the rolling miner count at the last point be the same number printed
in the tile above it, rather than a per-bucket count that would sit well below
it. Buckets are anchored to absolute height for the same reason `miner_series`
bins from the epoch: anchored to the tip instead, every boundary slides by one
on every block and the chart shifts under a reader watching it.

Interval comes from `authored_at`, never `observed_at`. A gap fill writes a
whole batch of observation times within the same second, so deltas taken from
it read as a chain producing hundreds of blocks a second — the trap
`RollingWindow`'s `at_tip` flag exists to avoid, which until now lived only in
memory. It is a column as of `0002`, so the distinction survives a restart and
`observed_at` is interpretable at all.

Each point's interval is a three-bucket moving average. The mean of one
bucket's gaps still carries real Poisson error — 72 blocks of a 15 s interval
lands at ±1.8 s — and across fifty points that draws a chain that appears to
change size every few minutes and does not.

Fixes a wrong number found on the way in: `pallet_qpow` retargets in
`on_finalize`, so `QPoWApi_get_difficulty` at the latest state is the
difficulty for the *next* block, not the one just seen. Every stored difficulty
was off by one block — invisible, because a gradual retarget still looks
plausible. It is now asked at `header.parent_hash`, the same call the miner
made when it built the block. A node that has pruned that state gets `None`
rather than the current value: substituting it is exactly how a gap fill would
stamp today's difficulty across a stretch of old heights. The CLI backfill had
the same bug at greater scale, copying one reading across an entire range.

Unknowns are drawn as breaks in the line, never interpolated: an outage, a
difficulty a pruned node cannot supply, a point without a full window of
authors behind it. A chart that guesses across what was never recorded is the
same class of lie as a hashrate divided by a sync speed, and just as hard to
catch afterwards.

Read against the dataviz skill first, per CLAUDE.md. Single series, one hue;
emphasis on the newest point is `--data-bright`, a lighter step of the same
bronze, because the usual "current period in the accent" convention is the one
change that would break this palette. The hover readout borrows each tile's
note line — five floating tooltips across a row of 180px tiles is a pile, not a
hover layer — and the same readout is on keyboard focus and in the aria-label,
since the line does not start at zero and its height is not a quantity anyone
should be estimating.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5
2026-09-08 14:39:27 +03:00
110fbc3631 feat: blackbeard.observer — live Quantus mining leaderboard
Cargo workspace plus a Vite frontend, following ~/git/architecture/generic.md.

Every block header carries its author's wormhole reward preimage in a `pow_`
PreRuntime digest, so authorship for the whole network is derivable from headers
alone — no indexer, no registration, no way for a miner to be left out. That
decoding, the hashrate maths and the telemetry name attribution live in
blackbeard-core with no I/O at all, so the parts that are easy to get subtly
wrong are exercised by unit tests rather than only against a live chain.

The browser holds one WebSocket: snapshot on subscribe, deltas thereafter. The
head stream is itself a push (chain_subscribeNewHeads), so a block reaches the
page the moment the node imports it. Messages are serialised once per broadcast,
and leaderboards are recomputed only for windows a socket is actually watching.
No RxJS — useSyncExternalStore is React's own contract for this.

Verified against the live Planck testnet: 12/12 headers decoded, telemetry names
attributed (quanpool-planck, baba-gorchitsa, …), warm start restoring 84 blocks
and 5 held names across a restart.

Three findings worth recording, all in CLAUDE.md:

- substrate-telemetry sends its JSON in *binary* frames. A text-only client
  connects, subscribes, reports healthy and receives nothing at all — and a
  Python probe hides it, because json.loads accepts bytes.
- Difficulty is a little-endian U512; decoding it big-endian gives a number
  wrong by ~10^150 that still renders fine.
- Planck's real block interval is ~13-15s against a 6s target with enormous
  variance, so a measured interval needs 20 tip samples before it is publishable.

Deploy assets, the Gitea Actions workflow and script/infra-setup.sh are included;
port 25864 is registered in architecture/port-allocations.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MSDYiibCtELsrjQq6KXnoi
2026-09-04 12:33:54 +03:00