Split the code-mode protocol and client from the V8-backed runtime so core and
app-server no longer link codex-code-mode in production. ThreadManager now
provisions durable code-mode sessions through a shared external host process,
while tests can still inject the in-process provider.
The IPC protocol uses a persistent stdin/stdout transport. Each frame is a
4-byte big-endian length followed by JSON, with a 16 MiB frame limit. Client
requests carry u64 request IDs so create, execute, wait, terminate, and shutdown
operations can be multiplexed over one process. Session IDs isolate durable
stored values. Execute returns an ExecutionStarted response immediately and an
asynchronous InitialResponse when the initial yield or completion is available.
Nested tool calls and notifications travel from the host back to the client as
delegate requests with their own IDs. Delegate responses, cancellation, and
cell-closed lifecycle messages use the same framed channel. Wire operations
encode errors as Result values. A dead connection fails pending operations,
cancels outstanding delegates, and lets the provider spawn a new host for later
sessions.
Build codex-code-mode-host with V8 pointer-compression sandbox support and add
it to canonical primary and app-server packages, legacy Linux and Windows
bundles, signing verification, installers, Python runtime packages, and release
CI for macOS, Linux, and Windows. The host is discovered next to the current
executable, through CODEX_CODE_MODE_HOST_PATH, or on PATH. OS-level seccomp or
seatbelt restrictions remain a follow-up to this cross-platform process split.
Benchmarks were run from release builds on Linux x86_64 with the V8 sandbox
profile and a text('ok') workload. Cold measurements used 30 samples, warm
session provisioning used 200, and warm command execution used 500. Values are
mean/p50/p95 in milliseconds:
- session startup: in-process 0.002/0.002/0.005, IPC 2.623/2.599/2.894
- fresh-session command: in-process 1.831/1.758/1.915, IPC 7.428/7.252/8.306
- warm session provisioning: in-process 0.002/0.002/0.003,
IPC 0.471/0.463/0.581
- warm command: in-process 1.759/1.757/1.940, IPC 2.005/2.001/2.166
The steady-state median command overhead is approximately 0.244 ms. The median
fresh host plus first command cost is 7.252 ms.
Validation:
- 62/62 core code-mode integration tests passed against the external host
- focused protocol, client, runtime, host, tools, and trace tests passed
- Cargo and Bazel real-process host IPC tests passed
- 11/11 package builder tests passed
- Bazel lock verification, scoped Clippy fixes, and repository formatting passed
codex-tools
codex-tools is the shared support crate for building, adapting, and executing
model-visible tools outside codex-core.
Today this crate owns the host-facing tool models and helpers that no longer
need to live in core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:
- aggregate host models such as
ToolSpec,ConfiguredToolSpec,LoadableToolSpec,ResponsesApiNamespace, andResponsesApiNamespaceTool - host discovery models used while assembling tool sets, including discoverable-tool models and request-plugin-install helpers
- host adapters such as schema sanitization, MCP/dynamic conversion, code-mode augmentation, and image-detail normalization
- shared executable-tool contracts such as
ToolExecutor,ToolCall, andToolOutput
That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to
move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is
to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping
compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding
boundaries are ready.
Vision
Over time, this crate should hold host-side tool machinery that is shared by multiple consumers, for example:
- host-visible aggregate tool models
- tool-set planning and discovery helpers
- MCP and dynamic-tool adaptation into Responses API shapes
- code-mode compatibility shims that do not depend on
codex-core - other narrowly scoped host utilities that multiple crates need
The corresponding non-goals are just as important:
- do not move
codex-coreorchestration here prematurely - do not pull
Session/TurnContext/ approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces - do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code
Migration approach
The expected migration shape is:
- Keep extension-owned executable-tool authoring in
codex-extension-api. - Move host-side planning/adaptation helpers here when they no longer need to
stay coupled to
codex-core. - Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in
codex-corewhile downstream call sites are updated. - Only extract higher-level host infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.
Crate conventions
This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it
stays easy to grow:
src/lib.rsshould remain exports-only.- Business logic should live in named module files such as
foo.rs. - Unit tests for
foo.rsshould live in a siblingfoo_tests.rs. - The implementation file should wire tests with:
#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;
If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from
codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding
more here.