## Why
`SandboxPolicy` is a legacy compatibility shape, but several core tests
still used it for ordinary turn setup even when the runtime path now
carries `PermissionProfile`. With the first cleanup PR merged, this
follow-up trims more core test scaffolding so remaining `SandboxPolicy`
matches are easier to classify as production compatibility,
legacy-boundary coverage, or explicit conversion tests.
## What Changed
- Updated apply-patch handler and runtime tests to pass
`PermissionProfile` directly.
- Changed sandboxing test helpers to build permission profiles without
first creating `SandboxPolicy` values.
- Converted request-permissions integration turns to pass
`PermissionProfile` through the test helper, leaving legacy sandbox
projection at the `Op::UserTurn` boundary.
- Converted unified exec integration helpers and direct turn submissions
to use `PermissionProfile` values instead of `SandboxPolicy` setup.
- Removed now-unused `SandboxPolicy` imports from the touched core
tests.
## Test Plan
- `just fmt`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::sandboxing::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::runtimes::apply_patch::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::handlers::apply_patch::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib unified_exec::process_manager::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --test all request_permissions::`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --test all unified_exec::`
- `just fix -p codex-core`
## Why
Managed filesystem `deny_read` requirements are administrator-enforced
restrictions on specific paths. Once those requirements are active,
Codex should not drop them just because an execution path would
otherwise leave the sandbox.
Before this change, an explicit escalation, a prefix-rule allow, a
sandbox-denial retry, or an app-server legacy sandbox override could
rebuild the runtime policy without those managed read-deny entries and
expose a path the administrator had marked unreadable.
This is narrower than general sandbox-mode constraints. If an enterprise
only sets `allowed_sandbox_modes`, a trusted `prefix_rule(..., decision
= "allow")` can still run its matching command unsandboxed; this PR only
preserves managed filesystem `deny_read` restrictions across those
paths.
## What Changed
- Mark filesystem policies built from managed `deny_read` requirements
so callers can tell when those deny entries must survive escalation.
- Preserve managed deny-read entries when runtime permission profiles
are rebuilt through protocol, app-server, or legacy sandbox-policy
compatibility paths.
- Keep managed deny-read attempts inside the selected sandbox on the
first attempt and after sandbox-denial retries.
- Preserve the same behavior in the zsh-fork escalation path, including
prefix-rule-driven escalation.
- Add a regression test showing the opposite case too: without managed
deny-read, a prefix-rule allow still chooses unsandboxed execution.
## Verification
Targeted automated verification:
```shell
cargo test -p codex-core shell_request_escalation_execution_is_explicit -- --nocapture
cargo test -p codex-core prefix_rule_uses_unsandboxed_execution_without_managed_deny_read -- --nocapture
cargo test -p codex-core prefix_rule_preserves_managed_deny_read_escalation -- --nocapture
cargo test -p codex-protocol permission_profile_round_trip_preserves_filesystem_policy_metadata -- --nocapture
cargo test -p codex-protocol preserving_deny_entries_keeps_unrestricted_policy_enforceable -- --nocapture
cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol permission_profile_file_system_permissions_preserves_policy_metadata -- --nocapture
cargo check -p codex-app-server -p codex-tui
```
Smoke-test invocations:
```shell
# macOS exact deny + allowed control
codex exec --skip-git-repo-check -C "$ROOT" \
-c 'default_permissions="deny_read_smoke"' \
-c 'permissions.deny_read_smoke.filesystem={":minimal"="read",":project_roots"={"."="write","secrets"="none","future-secret"="none","**/*.env"="none"}}' \
'Run shell commands only. Print the contents of allowed.txt. Then test whether reading secrets/exact-secret.txt succeeds without printing that file if it does. End with exactly two lines: allowed=<contents> and exact_secret=<BLOCKED or READABLE>.'
# Linux exact deny + allowed control
codex exec --skip-git-repo-check -C "$ROOT" \
-c 'default_permissions="deny_read_smoke"' \
-c 'permissions.deny_read_smoke.filesystem={":minimal"="read",glob_scan_max_depth=3,":project_roots"={"."="write","secrets"="none","future-secret"="none","**/*.env"="none"}}' \
'Run shell commands only. Print the contents of allowed.txt. Then test whether reading secrets/exact-secret.txt succeeds without printing that file if it does. End with exactly two lines: allowed=<contents> and exact_secret=<BLOCKED or READABLE>.'
```
Observed manual smoke matrix:
| Case | macOS Seatbelt | Linux bubblewrap |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `cat allowed.txt` | Pass | Pass |
| `cat secrets/exact-secret.txt` | Blocked | Blocked |
| `cat envs/root.env` | Blocked | Blocked |
| `cat envs/nested/one.env` | Blocked | Blocked |
| `cat envs/nested/two.env` | Blocked | Blocked |
| `cat alias-to-secrets/exact-secret.txt` | Blocked | Blocked |
| Missing denied path | A file created after sandbox setup remained
unreadable | Creation was blocked by the reserved missing-path
placeholder, and the placeholder was cleaned up after exit |
| Real `codex exec` shell turn | Pass | Pass |
Notes:
- The Linux smoke run used the fallback glob walker because the devbox
did not have `rg` installed.
- The smoke matrix verifies the end-to-end filesystem behavior on macOS
and Linux; the escalation-specific behavior is covered by the focused
tests above.
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charliemarsh@openai.com>
## Summary
Lifecycle hooks currently treat `PreToolUse`, `PostToolUse`, and
`PermissionRequest` as Bash-only flows
- hook schema constrains `tool_name` to `Bash`
- hook input assumes a command-shaped `tool_input`
- core hook dispatch path passes only shell command strings
That means hooks cannot target MCP tools even though MCP tool names are
model-visible and stable
This change generalizes those hook paths so they can match and receive
payloads for MCP tools while preserving the existing Bash behavior.
## Reviewer Notes
I think these are the key files
- `codex-rs/core/src/tools/handlers/mcp.rs`
- `codex-rs/core/src/mcp_tool_call.rs`
Otherwise the changes across apply_patch, shell, and unified_exec are
mainly to rewire everything to be `tool_input` based instead of just
`command` so that it'll make sense for MCP tools.
## Changes
- Allow `PreToolUse`, `PostToolUse`, and `PermissionRequest` hook inputs
to carry arbitrary `tool_name` and `tool_input` values instead of
hard-coding `Bash` and command-only payloads.
- Add MCP hook payload support through `McpHandler`, using the
model-visible tool name from `ToolInvocation` and the raw MCP arguments
as `tool_input`.
- Include MCP tool responses in `PostToolUse` by serializing
`McpToolOutput` into the hook response payload.
- Run `PermissionRequest` hooks for MCP approval requests after
remembered approval checks and before falling back to user-facing MCP
elicitation.
- Preserve exact matching for literal hook matchers like `Bash` and
`mcp__memory__create_entities`, while keeping regex matcher support for
patterns like `mcp__memory__.*` and `mcp__.*__write.*`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrei Eternal <eternal@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Why
PR #13783 moved the `codex.rs` unit tests into `codex_tests.rs`. This
applies the same extraction pattern across the rest of `codex-rs/core`
so the production modules stay focused on runtime code instead of large
inline test blocks.
Keeping the tests in sibling files also makes follow-up edits easier to
review because product changes no longer have to share a file with
hundreds or thousands of lines of test scaffolding.
## What changed
- replaced each inline `mod tests { ... }` in `codex-rs/core/src/**`
with a path-based module declaration
- moved each extracted unit test module into a sibling `*_tests.rs`
file, using `mod_tests.rs` for `mod.rs` modules
- preserved the existing `cfg(...)` guards and module-local structure so
the refactor remains structural rather than behavioral
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib` (`1653 passed; 0 failed; 5 ignored`)
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo fmt --check`
- `cargo shear`
Michael Bolin