This PR overhauls how active tool calls and completed tool calls are
displayed:
1. More use of colour to indicate success/failure and distinguish
between components like tool name+arguments
2. Previously, the entire `CallToolResult` was serialized to JSON and
pretty-printed. Now, we extract each individual `CallToolResultContent`
and print those
1. The previous solution was wasting space by unnecessarily showing
details of the `CallToolResult` struct to users, without formatting the
actual tool call results nicely
2. We're now able to show users more information from tool results in
less space, with nicer formatting when tools return JSON results
### Before:
<img width="1251" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-03 at 11 24 26"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5a58f222-219c-4c53-ace7-d887194e30cf"
/>
### After:
<img width="1265" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fe54d0-9ebe-406a-855b-7aa529b91274"
/>
## Future Work
1. Integrate image tool result handling better. We should be able to
display images even if they're not the first `CallToolResultContent`
2. Users should have some way to view the full version of truncated tool
results
3. It would be nice to add some left padding for tool results, make it
more clear that they are results. This is doable, just a little fiddly
due to the way `first_visible_line` scrolling works
4. There's almost certainly a better way to format JSON than "all on 1
line with spaces to make Ratatui wrapping work". But I think that works
OK for now.
This fixes a longstanding error in the Rust CLI where `codex.rs`
contained an errant `is_first_turn` check that would exclude the user
instructions for subsequent "turns" of a conversation when using the
responses API (i.e., when `previous_response_id` existed).
While here, renames `Prompt.instructions` to `Prompt.user_instructions`
since we now have quite a few levels of instructions floating around.
Also removed an unnecessary use of `clone()` in
`Prompt.get_full_instructions()`.
As explained in detail in the doc comment for `ParseMode::Lenient`, we
have observed that GPT-4.1 does not always generate a valid invocation
of `apply_patch`. Fortunately, the error is predictable, so we introduce
some new logic to the `codex-apply-patch` crate to recover from this
error.
Because we would like to avoid this becoming a de facto standard (as it
would be incompatible if `apply_patch` were provided as an actual
executable, unless we also introduced the lenient behavior in the
executable, as well), we require passing `ParseMode::Lenient` to
`parse_patch_text()` to make it clear that the caller is opting into
supporting this special case.
Note the analogous change to the TypeScript CLI was
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/930. In addition to changing the
accepted input to `apply_patch`, it also introduced additional
instructions for the model, which we include in this PR.
Note that `apply-patch` does not depend on either `regex` or
`regex-lite`, so some of the checks are slightly more verbose to avoid
introducing this dependency.
That said, this PR does not leverage the existing
`extract_heredoc_body_from_apply_patch_command()`, which depends on
`tree-sitter` and `tree-sitter-bash`:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/5a5aa899143f9b9ef606692c401b010368b15bdb/codex-rs/apply-patch/src/lib.rs#L191-L246
though perhaps it should.
Previous to this PR, we always set `reasoning` when making a request
using the Responses API:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/d7245cbbc9d8ff5446da45e5951761103492476d/codex-rs/core/src/client.rs#L108-L111
Though if you tried to use the Rust CLI with `--model gpt-4.1`, this
would fail with:
```shell
"Unsupported parameter: 'reasoning.effort' is not supported with this model."
```
We take a cue from the TypeScript CLI, which does a check on the model
name:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/d7245cbbc9d8ff5446da45e5951761103492476d/codex-cli/src/utils/agent/agent-loop.ts#L786-L789
This PR does a similar check, though also adds support for the following
config options:
```
model_reasoning_effort = "low" | "medium" | "high" | "none"
model_reasoning_summary = "auto" | "concise" | "detailed" | "none"
```
This way, if you have a model whose name happens to start with `"o"` (or
`"codex"`?), you can set these to `"none"` to explicitly disable
reasoning, if necessary. (That said, it seems unlikely anyone would use
the Responses API with non-OpenAI models, but we provide an escape
hatch, anyway.)
This PR also updates both the TUI and `codex exec` to show `reasoning
effort` and `reasoning summaries` in the header.
Prior to this PR, there were two big misses in `chat_completions.rs`:
1. The loop in `stream_chat_completions()` was only including items of
type `ResponseItem::Message` when building up the `"messages"` JSON for
the `POST` request to the `chat/completions` endpoint. This fixes things
by ensuring other variants (`FunctionCall`, `LocalShellCall`, and
`FunctionCallOutput`) are included, as well.
2. In `process_chat_sse()`, we were not recording tool calls and were
only emitting items of type
`ResponseEvent::OutputItemDone(ResponseItem::Message)` to the stream.
Now we introduce `FunctionCallState`, which is used to accumulate the
`delta`s of type `tool_calls`, so we can ultimately emit a
`ResponseItem::FunctionCall`, when appropriate.
While function calling now appears to work for chat completions with my
local testing, I believe that there are still edge cases that are not
covered and that this codepath would benefit from a battery of
integration tests. (As part of that further cleanup, we should also work
to support streaming responses in the UI.)
The other important part of this PR is some cleanup in
`core/src/codex.rs`. In particular, it was hard to reason about how
`run_task()` was building up the list of messages to include in a
request across the various cases:
- Responses API
- Chat Completions API
- Responses API used in concert with ZDR
I like to think things are a bit cleaner now where:
- `zdr_transcript` (if present) contains all messages in the history of
the conversation, which includes function call outputs that have not
been sent back to the model yet
- `pending_input` includes any messages the user has submitted while the
turn is in flight that need to be injected as part of the next `POST` to
the model
- `input_for_next_turn` includes the tool call outputs that have not
been sent back to the model yet
Michael Bolin