Bumps [whoami](https://github.com/ardaku/whoami) from 1.6.0 to 1.6.1.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/ardaku/whoami/commits">compare view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Historically, Codex CLI has treated `apply_patch` (and its sometimes
misspelling, `applypatch`) as a "virtual CLI," intercepting it when it
appears as the first arg to `command` for the `"container.exec",
`"shell"`, or `"local_shell"` tools.
This approach has a known limitation where if, say, the model created a
Python script that runs `apply_patch` and then tried to run the Python
script, we have no insight as to what the model is trying to do and the
Python Script would fail because `apply_patch` was never really on the
`PATH`.
One way to solve this problem is to require users to install an
`apply_patch` executable alongside the `codex` executable (or at least
put it someplace where Codex can discover it). Though to keep Codex CLI
as a standalone executable, we exploit "the arg0 trick" where we create
a temporary directory with an entry named `apply_patch` and prepend that
directory to the `PATH` for the duration of the invocation of Codex.
- On UNIX, `apply_patch` is a symlink to `codex`, which now changes its
behavior to behave like `apply_patch` if arg0 is `apply_patch` (or
`applypatch`)
- On Windows, `apply_patch.bat` is a batch script that runs `codex
--codex-run-as-apply-patch %*`, as Codex also changes its behavior if
the first argument is `--codex-run-as-apply-patch`.
## Summary
We're seeing some issues in the freeform tool - let's disable by default
until it stabilizes.
## Testing
- [x] Ran locally, confirmed codex-cli could make edits
this dramatically improves time to run `cargo test -p codex-core` (~25x
speedup).
before:
```
cargo test -p codex-core 35.96s user 68.63s system 19% cpu 8:49.80 total
```
after:
```
cargo test -p codex-core 5.51s user 8.16s system 63% cpu 21.407 total
```
both tests measured "hot", i.e. on a 2nd run with no filesystem changes,
to exclude compile times.
approach inspired by [Delete Cargo Integration
Tests](https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html),
we move all test cases in tests/ into a single suite in order to have a
single binary, as there is significant overhead for each test binary
executed, and because test execution is only parallelized with a single
binary.
Adds web_search tool, enabling the model to use Responses API web_search
tool.
- Disabled by default, enabled by --search flag
- When --search is passed, exposes web_search_request function tool to
the model, which triggers user approval. When approved, the model can
use the web_search tool for the remainder of the turn
<img width="1033" height="294" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62ac6563-b946-465c-ba5d-9325af28b28f"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: easong-openai <easong@openai.com>
We want to send an aggregated output of stderr and stdout so we don't
have to aggregate it stderr+stdout as we lose order sometimes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Peal <gpeal@users.noreply.github.com>
This can be the underlying logic in order to start a conversation from a
previous message. will need some love in the UI.
Base for building this: #2588
## Summary
- read the shell exec approval request's actual id instead of assuming
it is always 0
- use that id when validating and responding in the test
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-mcp-server
test_shell_command_approval_triggers_elicitation`
------
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_i_68a6ab9c732c832c81522cbf11812be0
Prior to this change, when we got a `CallToolResult` from an MCP server,
we JSON-serialized its `content` field as the `content` to send back to
the model as part of the function call output that we send back to the
model. This meant that we were dropping the `structuredContent` on the
floor.
Though reading
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/schema#tool, it
appears that if `outputSchema` is specified, then `structuredContent`
should be set, which seems to be a "higher-fidelity" response to the
function call. This PR updates our handling of `CallToolResult` to
prefer using the JSON-serialization of `structuredContent`, if present,
using `content` as a fallback.
Also, it appears that the sense of `success` was inverted prior to this
PR!
before:
```
$ time cargo test -p codex-tui -q
[...]
cargo test -p codex-tui -q 39.89s user 10.77s system 98% cpu 51.328 total
```
after:
```
$ time cargo test -p codex-tui -q
[...]
cargo test -p codex-tui -q 1.37s user 0.64s system 29% cpu 6.699 total
```
the major offenders were the textarea fuzz test and the custom_terminal
doctests. (i think the doctests were being recompiled every time which
made them extra slow?)
## Summary
When resolving our current directory as a project, we want to be a
little bit more clever:
1. If we're in a sub-directory of a git repo, resolve our project
against the root of the git repo
2. If we're in a git worktree, resolve the project against the root of
the git repo
## Testing
- [x] Added unit tests
- [x] Confirmed locally with a git worktree (the one i was using for
this feature)
ae