Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jif 9def09afa7 Use serving assessments for adaptive Guardian review (#58075)
## What changed

- Match final serving assessments to their response and output item, then retain them with tool invocations and code cells across waits.
- Use matching assessments instead of asynchronous scoring for adaptive review: low-risk actions can skip synchronous review, while elevated-risk actions require it.
- Revalidate captured authorization and policy before approval. Require fresh review for stale or incomplete authorization, preserve explicit review requirements, and discard assessments when hooks rewrite tool input.
- Keep asynchronous scoring as the fallback when an assessment is missing or does not match.

## Testing

Add integration coverage for direct and nested tool calls, hook rewrites, explicit escalation, interrupted responses, catalog-driven policy, incomplete authorization, and assessment retention across code-cell yields and waits.

GitOrigin-RevId: 4346a227204137f018c03c34b302d6f1e9592c96
2026-10-29 12:54:39 +00:00
jif fc916a22b5 Expose Guardian assessments in response streams (#57757)
## What changed

Decode `response.metadata` Guardian assessments into typed `GuardianAssessment` events over SSE and WebSocket, carrying `response_id`, `item_id`, and `requires_review`. Ignore assessments with missing, empty, or incorrectly typed required fields while preserving independent delivery of other metadata.

Expose the assessment type to request-scoped extension interceptors. Keep assessments out of conversation history; they do not authorize tool execution.

## Testing

Add SSE coverage for assessment ordering, malformed metadata, and mixed metadata delivery. Extend model request tests to cover SSE and WebSocket interceptor delivery and exclusion from subsequent model input.

GitOrigin-RevId: 282b8817ee97346d76b40bcb412eef023df60ff1
2026-10-28 15:04:29 +00:00