## Summary
- add `self_serve_business_usage_based` and `enterprise_cbp_usage_based`
to the public/internal plan enums and regenerate the app-server + Python
SDK artifacts
- map both plans through JWT login and backend rate-limit payloads, then
bucket them with the existing Team/Business entitlement behavior in
cloud requirements, usage-limit copy, tooltips, and status display
- keep the earlier display-label remap commit on this branch so the new
Team-like and Business-like plans render consistently in the UI
## Testing
- `just write-app-server-schema`
- `uv run --project sdk/python python
sdk/python/scripts/update_sdk_artifacts.py generate-types`
- `just fix -p codex-protocol -p codex-login -p codex-core -p
codex-backend-client -p codex-cloud-requirements -p codex-tui -p
codex-tui-app-server -p codex-backend-openapi-models`
- `just fmt`
- `just argument-comment-lint`
- `cargo test -p codex-protocol
usage_based_plan_types_use_expected_wire_names`
- `cargo test -p codex-login usage_based`
- `cargo test -p codex-backend-client usage_based`
- `cargo test -p codex-cloud-requirements usage_based`
- `cargo test -p codex-core usage_limit_reached_error_formats_`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui plan_type_display_name_remaps_display_labels`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui remapped`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server
plan_type_display_name_remaps_display_labels`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server remapped`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server
preserves_usage_based_plan_type_wire_name`
## Notes
- a broader multi-crate `cargo test` run still hits unrelated existing
guardian-approval config failures in
`codex-rs/core/src/config/config_tests.rs`
CXC-392
[With
401](https://openai.sentry.io/issues/7333870443/?project=4510195390611458&query=019ce8f8-560c-7f10-a00a-c59553740674&referrer=issue-stream)
<img width="1909" height="555" alt="401 auth tags in Sentry"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/412ea950-61c4-4780-9697-15c270971ee3"
/>
- auth_401_*: preserved facts from the latest unauthorized response snapshot
- auth_*: latest auth-related facts from the latest request attempt
- auth_recovery_*: unauthorized recovery state and follow-up result
Without 401
<img width="1917" height="522" alt="happy-path auth tags in Sentry"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3381ed28-8022-43b0-b6c0-623a630e679f"
/>
###### Summary
- Add client-visible 401 diagnostics for auth attachment, upstream auth classification, and 401 request id / cf-ray correlation.
- Record unauthorized recovery mode, phase, outcome, and retry/follow-up status without changing auth behavior.
- Surface the highest-signal auth and recovery fields on uploaded client bug reports so they are usable in Sentry.
- Preserve original unauthorized evidence under `auth_401_*` while keeping follow-up result tags separate.
###### Rationale (from spec findings)
- The dominant bucket needed proof of whether the client attached auth before send or upstream still classified the request as missing auth.
- Client uploads needed to show whether unauthorized recovery ran and what the client tried next.
- Request id and cf-ray needed to be preserved on the unauthorized response so server-side correlation is immediate.
- The bug-report path needed the same auth evidence as the request telemetry path, otherwise the observability would not be operationally useful.
###### Scope
- Add auth 401 and unauthorized-recovery observability in `codex-rs/core`, `codex-rs/codex-api`, and `codex-rs/otel`, including feedback-tag surfacing.
- Keep auth semantics, refresh behavior, retry behavior, endpoint classification, and geo-denial follow-up work out of this PR.
###### Trade-offs
- This exports only safe auth evidence: header presence/name, upstream auth classification, request ids, and recovery state. It does not export token values or raw upstream bodies.
- This keeps websocket connection reuse as a transport clue because it can help distinguish stale reused sessions from fresh reconnects.
- Misroute/base-url classification and geo-denial are intentionally deferred to a separate follow-up PR so this review stays focused on the dominant auth 401 bucket.
###### Client follow-up
- PR 2 will add misroute/provider and geo-denial observability plus the matching feedback-tag surfacing.
- A separate host/app-server PR should log auth-decision inputs so pre-send host auth state can be correlated with client request evidence.
- `device_id` remains intentionally separate until there is a safe existing source on the feedback upload path.
###### Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core refresh_available_models_sorts_by_priority`
- `cargo test -p codex-core emit_feedback_request_tags_`
- `cargo test -p codex-core emit_feedback_auth_recovery_tags_`
- `cargo test -p codex-core auth_request_telemetry_context_tracks_attached_auth_and_retry_phase`
- `cargo test -p codex-core extract_response_debug_context_decodes_identity_headers`
- `cargo test -p codex-core identity_auth_details`
- `cargo test -p codex-core telemetry_error_messages_preserve_non_http_details`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --all-features --no-run`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel otel_export_routing_policy_routes_api_request_auth_observability`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel otel_export_routing_policy_routes_websocket_connect_auth_observability`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel otel_export_routing_policy_routes_websocket_request_transport_observability`
## Why
PR #13783 moved the `codex.rs` unit tests into `codex_tests.rs`. This
applies the same extraction pattern across the rest of `codex-rs/core`
so the production modules stay focused on runtime code instead of large
inline test blocks.
Keeping the tests in sibling files also makes follow-up edits easier to
review because product changes no longer have to share a file with
hundreds or thousands of lines of test scaffolding.
## What changed
- replaced each inline `mod tests { ... }` in `codex-rs/core/src/**`
with a path-based module declaration
- moved each extracted unit test module into a sibling `*_tests.rs`
file, using `mod_tests.rs` for `mod.rs` modules
- preserved the existing `cfg(...)` guards and module-local structure so
the refactor remains structural rather than behavioral
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib` (`1653 passed; 0 failed; 5 ignored`)
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo fmt --check`
- `cargo shear`
bwanner-oai