Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
victor-openai
eec4a23cb1 Support openai/elicitation form requests (#41447)
## What changed

- Advertise `openai/elicitation` form support when the client declares an
  object-valued `form` capability, without deriving it from the legacy
  `openai/form` capability.
- Handle `openai/elicitation/create` requests in `form` mode and forward their
  metadata and opaque schema through app-server as `openaiForm`, preserving
  `x-openai-*` annotations.
- Keep legacy form handling independent and have the TUI automatically decline
  the new form requests it cannot render.

## Testing

- Add an app-server round-trip test for capability negotiation, request
  forwarding, and accepted responses.
- Extend MCP capability filtering coverage for `openai/elicitation.form`.

GitOrigin-RevId: 88f39257bffafe4ee98a9c910e38507843cd7eeb
2026-08-29 02:43:10 +00:00
Gabriel Peal
21a599fa56 Support openai/form extended form elicitations (#27500)
# Summary
Allow App Server clients to opt into `openai/form` MCP elicitations.
2026-06-18 11:54:49 -07:00
Matthew Zeng
98dca99db7 [elicitations] Switch to use MCP style elicitation payload for mcp tool approvals. (#13621)
- [x] Switch to use MCP style elicitation payload for mcp tool
approvals.
- [ ] TODO: Update the UI to support the full spec.
2026-03-06 01:50:26 -08:00
Owen Lin
926b2f19e8 feat(app-server): support mcp elicitations in v2 api (#13425)
This adds a first-class server request for MCP server elicitations:
`mcpServer/elicitation/request`.

Until now, MCP elicitation requests only showed up as a raw
`codex/event/elicitation_request` event from core. That made it hard for
v2 clients to handle elicitations using the same request/response flow
as other server-driven interactions (like shell and `apply_patch`
tools).

This also updates the underlying MCP elicitation request handling in
core to pass through the full MCP request (including URL and form data)
so we can expose it properly in app-server.

### Why not `item/mcpToolCall/elicitationRequest`?
This is because MCP elicitations are related to MCP servers first, and
only optionally to a specific MCP tool call.

In the MCP protocol, elicitation is a server-to-client capability: the
server sends `elicitation/create`, and the client replies with an
elicitation result. RMCP models it that way as well.

In practice an elicitation is often triggered by an MCP tool call, but
not always.

### What changed
- add `mcpServer/elicitation/request` to the v2 app-server API
- translate core `codex/event/elicitation_request` events into the new
v2 server request
- map client responses back into `Op::ResolveElicitation` so the MCP
server can continue
- update app-server docs and generated protocol schema
- add an end-to-end app-server test that covers the full round trip
through a real RMCP elicitation flow
- The new test exercises a realistic case where an MCP tool call
triggers an elicitation, the app-server emits
mcpServer/elicitation/request, the client accepts it, and the tool call
resumes and completes successfully.

### app-server API flow
- Client starts a thread with `thread/start`.
- Client starts a turn with `turn/start`.
- App-server sends `item/started` for the `mcpToolCall`.
- While that tool call is in progress, app-server sends
`mcpServer/elicitation/request`.
- Client responds to that request with `{ action: "accept" | "decline" |
"cancel" }`.
- App-server sends `serverRequest/resolved`.
- App-server sends `item/completed` for the mcpToolCall.
- App-server sends `turn/completed`.
- If the turn is interrupted while the elicitation is pending,
app-server still sends `serverRequest/resolved` before the turn
finishes.
2026-03-05 07:20:20 -08:00