## Why
`ExecutorFileSystem::get_metadata` reports file kind and timestamps but
not size. Internal callers that need to enforce a size limit therefore
have to read the complete file first, which is especially wasteful for
remote filesystems.
This adds the missing internal metadata so consumers can reject
oversized files before transferring or buffering them. The field is
named `size`, matching VS Code's `FileStat.size` filesystem convention.
## What changed
- add `size: u64` to internal `FileMetadata`
- populate it from the underlying filesystem metadata
- carry it through sandbox-helper and remote exec-server responses
- cover files, directories, symlink targets, and sandboxed reads across
local and remote filesystem implementations
The new field is intentionally not exposed through the app-server API.
## Testing
- `just test -p codex-exec-server get_metadata`
- `just test -p codex-exec-server
file_system_sandboxed_metadata_and_read_allow_readable_root`
- `just test -p codex-core-plugins`
- `just test -p codex-skills-extension`
## Why
Sandbox cwd values can cross app-server and exec-server host boundaries.
They should retain URI semantics until the receiving host validates them
instead of being interpreted early as native paths.
## What
- Carry `PathUri` through filesystem sandbox contexts, sandbox commands,
and transform inputs.
- Convert command and policy cwd once in `SandboxManager::transform`,
then keep launch requests native.
- Preserve sandbox cwd over remote filesystem transport and reject
non-native URIs without fallback.
- Cache paired native/URI turn-environment cwd values during migration,
with immutable access to keep them synchronized.
- Extend existing protocol, forwarding, transform, and core runtime
tests.
## Summary
Path composition is already handled by `PathUri`, leaving `fs/join` and
`fs/parent` as redundant exec-server protocol surface. Because
app-server and exec-server are deployed atomically, these obsolete
methods can be removed without a compatibility shim.
This removes the protocol constants and payloads, public client APIs,
server registrations and handlers, and endpoint-only tests. Existing
in-process `PathUri` join/parent coverage remains.
## Validation
- `just test -p codex-exec-server` (215 passed, 2 skipped)
Exec-server filesystem calls should preserve cross-platform `file:` URIs
across the remote boundary instead of converting them through paths
native to the client host.
This changes the exec-server filesystem protocol DTOs to use `PathUri`,
carries those values directly through remote and sandbox-helper
transports, and keeps legacy native absolute-path request strings
readable for compatibility. It also updates protocol documentation and
coverage for URI serialization and non-native URI forwarding.
## Why
We're moving exec-server to use PathUri for its internal path
representations.
## What
Move `ExecutorFileSystem` APIs to use `PathUri` instead of
`AbsolutePathBuf`. Future changes will convert higher-level parts of
exec-server.
## Summary
- add executor filesystem canonicalization as a bound-path operation
- route remote canonicalization through the exec-server filesystem RPC
surface
- keep path normalization attached to the filesystem that owns the path
## Stack
- 2/5 in the skills path authority stack extracted from
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/25098
- follows merged https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/25121
## Validation
- `cd
/Users/starr/code/codex-worktrees/pr-25098-restack-review-pr1b/codex-rs
&& just fmt`
- Not run: tests/checks (not requested)
- GitHub CI pending on rewritten head
## Why
This is a cleanup PR for the `PermissionProfile` migration stack. #19016
fixed remote exec-server sandbox contexts so Docker-backed filesystem
requests use a request/container `cwd` instead of leaking the local test
runner `cwd`. That exposed the broader API problem:
`FileSystemSandboxContext::new(SandboxPolicy)` could still reconstruct
filesystem permissions by reading the exec-server process cwd with
`AbsolutePathBuf::current_dir()`.
That made `cwd`-dependent legacy entries, such as `:cwd`,
`:project_roots`, and relative deny globs, depend on ambient process
state instead of the request sandbox `cwd`. As later PRs make
`PermissionProfile` the primary permissions abstraction, sandbox
contexts should be explicit about whether they carry a request `cwd` or
are profile-only. Removing the implicit constructor prevents new call
sites from accidentally rebuilding permissions against the wrong `cwd`.
## What changed
- Removed `FileSystemSandboxContext::new(SandboxPolicy)`.
- Kept production callers on explicit constructors:
`from_legacy_sandbox_policy(..., cwd)`, `from_permission_profile(...)`,
and `from_permission_profile_with_cwd(...)`.
- Updated exec-server test helpers to construct `PermissionProfile`
values directly instead of routing through legacy `SandboxPolicy`
projections.
- Updated the environment regression test to use an explicit restricted
profile with no synthetic `cwd`.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server`
- `just fix -p codex-exec-server`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/19046).
* #18288
* #18287
* #18286
* #18285
* #18284
* #18283
* #18282
* #18281
* #18280
* __->__ #19046
## Summary
- add optional `sandboxPolicy` support to the app-server filesystem
request surface
- thread sandbox-aware filesystem options through app-server and
exec-server adapters
- enforce sandboxed read/write access in the filesystem abstraction with
focused local and remote coverage
## Validation
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server file_system`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server suite::v2::fs`
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Summary
- make AGENTS.md discovery and loading fully FS-aware and remove the
non-FS discover helper
- migrate remote-aware codex-core tests to use TestEnv workspace setup
instead of syncing a local workspace copy
- add AGENTS.md corner-case coverage, including directory fallbacks and
remote-aware integration coverage
## Testing
- cargo test -p codex-core project_doc -- --nocapture
- cargo test -p codex-core hierarchical_agents -- --nocapture
- cargo test -p codex-core agents_md -- --nocapture
- cargo test -p codex-tui status -- --nocapture
- cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server status -- --nocapture
- just fix
- just fmt
- just bazel-lock-update
- just bazel-lock-check
- just argument-comment-lint
- remote Linux executor tests in progress via scripts/test-remote-env.sh
For each feature we have:
1. Trait exposed on environment
2. **Local Implementation** of the trait
3. Remote implementation that uses the client to proxy via network
4. Handler implementation that handles PRC requests and calls into
**Local Implementation**
