Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Adam Perry @ OpenAI 1bc02aea50 Sanitize credentials from Git remote metadata (#40713)
## Why

Git remote URLs can embed usernames, passwords, or tokens. Codex carries these
URLs through turn metadata and persisted thread metadata, so credentials must be
removed before a remote enters those paths.

## What changed

- Add `SanitizedGitUrl`, which parses Git URL and SCP-style remotes, strips
  authentication data, and preserves the conventional `git` SSH user.
- Use sanitized remotes when collecting Git metadata, enriching model requests,
  discovering cloud environments, updating thread metadata, and reading legacy
  rollouts. Reject or omit malformed remotes instead of retaining their raw
  contents.
- Keep API, schema, and TypeScript representations as strings while enforcing
  sanitization in Rust.

## Testing

- Cover URL schemes, SCP and IPv6 forms, remote helpers, encoded paths,
  malformed values, and legacy deserialization.
- Verify credentials do not appear in model requests, API responses, SQLite, or
  rollout files.

GitOrigin-RevId: 6435efc4c45bfbfad4723ce7a0457cb00175f25c
2026-08-25 21:34:05 +00:00
Jeremy Rose 7ada37a15e Reject implicitly discovered bare Git repositories (#36924)
## Why

A repository can contain a tracked directory that Git implicitly treats as a bare
repository. Its configuration may select helpers such as `core.fsmonitor`, causing
Codex Git operations in that directory to execute repository-controlled code.

## What changed

- Pass `-c safe.bareRepository=explicit` to Codex-managed Git commands so they
  reject implicitly discovered bare repositories.
- Continue to support repositories explicitly selected with `--git-dir` or
  `GIT_DIR`.

## Testing

Add a regression test that clones a repository containing a tracked embedded Git
repository and verifies that guarded Git inspection rejects it without running
its configured filesystem monitor.

GitOrigin-RevId: 344b5bc1e0ffa94f2a1b788488aa653222da10f3
2026-08-04 16:53:33 +00:00
Michael Bolin 0e15c31d91 Route cloud environment discovery through the HTTP client pool (#34491)
## What changed

- Build a route-aware API client from the cloud backend's configured HTTP
  factory and reuse it for environment listing and autodetection.
- Replace direct `reqwest` environment requests with a small injectable HTTP
  boundary while preserving status, content-type, body, and header handling.
- Centralize asynchronous environment-list loading around the initialized
  backend context.

## Testing

- Add coverage for production header forwarding and response decoding.
- Verify repository-specific lookup, global fallback, endpoint selection,
  deduplication, and merged environment metadata with a fake HTTP client.

GitOrigin-RevId: 2e6812015ec3eb01773184541a1fad135ed53edb
2026-07-21 08:36:40 +00:00
Michael Bolin 641aa1b619 Migrate direct HTTP consumers to codex-http-client (#31331)
## Why

#31323 introduces `codex-http-client` and leaves compatibility
re-exports in `codex-client`. Low-level HTTP consumers should depend on
the crate that now owns those APIs rather than continuing through the
transitional compatibility layer.

This stacked follow-up makes that ownership explicit and moves the
repository toward enforcing the abstraction without mixing call-site
churn into the extraction itself.

## What changed

- Switched `codex-backend-client`, `codex-cloud-tasks`,
`codex-exec-server`, `codex-login`, and `codex-model-provider` from
`codex-client` to `codex-http-client` where they only use low-level HTTP
APIs.
- Added the direct dependency to `codex-api` for its custom-CA request
and websocket paths while retaining `codex-client` for higher-level
retry and transport policy.
- Updated imports and normalized login's internal client type name from
`CodexHttpClient` to `HttpClient`, while preserving its existing
`CodexRequestBuilder` re-export.
- Updated `Cargo.lock` to reflect the new direct dependency edges.

## Review guide

This PR is intentionally mechanical: 20 files and 92 changed lines, with
no runtime logic changes. The largest diff is
`codex-rs/login/src/auth/default_client.rs`, where the only
semantic-looking changes are type and import renames. The remaining
source changes replace `codex_client` import paths with
`codex_http_client`; the manifest and lockfile changes mirror those
imports.

## Test plan

- Compile-checked `codex-api`, `codex-backend-client`,
`codex-cloud-tasks`, `codex-exec-server`, `codex-login`, and
`codex-model-provider` together.
2026-07-07 01:34:36 +00:00
6912da84a8 client: extend custom CA handling across HTTPS and websocket clients (#14239)
## Stacked PRs

This work is now effectively split across two steps:

- #14178: add custom CA support for browser and device-code login flows,
docs, and hermetic subprocess tests
- #14239: extend that shared custom CA handling across Codex HTTPS
clients and secure websocket TLS

Note: #14240 was merged into this branch while it was stacked on top of
this PR. This PR now subsumes that websocket follow-up and should be
treated as the combined change.

Builds on top of #14178.

## Problem

Custom CA support landed first in the login path, but the real
requirement is broader. Codex constructs outbound TLS clients in
multiple places, and both HTTPS and secure websocket paths can fail
behind enterprise TLS interception if they do not honor
`CODEX_CA_CERTIFICATE` or `SSL_CERT_FILE` consistently.

This PR broadens the shared custom-CA logic beyond login and applies the
same policy to websocket TLS, so the enterprise-proxy story is no longer
split between “HTTPS works” and “websockets still fail”.

## What This Delivers

Custom CA support is no longer limited to login. Codex outbound HTTPS
clients and secure websocket connections can now honor the same
`CODEX_CA_CERTIFICATE` / `SSL_CERT_FILE` configuration, so enterprise
proxy/intercept setups work more consistently end-to-end.

For users and operators, nothing new needs to be configured beyond the
same CA env vars introduced in #14178. The change is that more of Codex
now respects them, including websocket-backed flows that were previously
still using default trust roots.

I also manually validated the proxy path locally with mitmproxy using:
`CODEX_CA_CERTIFICATE=~/.mitmproxy/mitmproxy-ca-cert.pem
HTTPS_PROXY=http://127.0.0.1:8080 just codex`
with mitmproxy installed via `brew install mitmproxy` and configured as
the macOS system proxy.

## Mental model

`codex-client` is now the owner of shared custom-CA policy for outbound
TLS client construction. Reqwest callers start from the builder
configuration they already need, then pass that builder through
`build_reqwest_client_with_custom_ca(...)`. Websocket callers ask the
same module for a rustls client config when a custom CA bundle is
configured.

The env precedence is the same everywhere:
- `CODEX_CA_CERTIFICATE` wins
- otherwise fall back to `SSL_CERT_FILE`
- otherwise use system roots

The helper is intentionally narrow. It loads every usable certificate
from the configured PEM bundle into the appropriate root store and
returns either a configured transport or a typed error that explains
what went wrong.

## Non-goals

This does not add handshake-level integration tests against a live TLS
endpoint. It does not validate that the configured bundle forms a
meaningful certificate chain. It also does not try to force every
transport in the repo through one abstraction; it extends the shared CA
policy across the reqwest and websocket paths that actually needed it.

## Tradeoffs

The main tradeoff is centralizing CA behavior in `codex-client` while
still leaving adoption up to call sites. That keeps the implementation
additive and reviewable, but it means the rule "outbound Codex TLS that
should honor enterprise roots must use the shared helper" is still
partly enforced socially rather than by types.

For websockets, the shared helper only builds an explicit rustls config
when a custom CA bundle is configured. When no override env var is set,
websocket callers still use their ordinary default connector path.

## Architecture

`codex-client::custom_ca` now owns CA bundle selection, PEM
normalization, mixed-section parsing, certificate extraction, typed
CA-loading errors, and optional rustls client-config construction for
websocket TLS.

The affected consumers now call into that shared helper directly rather
than carrying login-local CA behavior:
- backend-client
- cloud-tasks
- RMCP client paths that use `reqwest`
- TUI voice HTTP paths
- `codex-core` default reqwest client construction
- `codex-api` websocket clients for both responses and realtime
websocket connections

The subprocess CA probe, env-sensitive integration tests, and shared PEM
fixtures also live in `codex-client`, which is now the actual owner of
the behavior they exercise.

## Observability

The shared CA path logs:
- which environment variable selected the bundle
- which path was loaded
- how many certificates were accepted
- when `TRUSTED CERTIFICATE` labels were normalized
- when CRLs were ignored
- where client construction failed

Returned errors remain user-facing and include the relevant env var,
path, and remediation hint. That same error model now applies whether
the failure surfaced while building a reqwest client or websocket TLS
configuration.

## Tests

Pure unit tests in `codex-client` cover env precedence and PEM
normalization behavior. Real client construction remains in subprocess
tests so the suite can control process env and avoid the macOS seatbelt
panic path that motivated the hermetic test split.

The subprocess coverage verifies:
- `CODEX_CA_CERTIFICATE` precedence over `SSL_CERT_FILE`
- fallback to `SSL_CERT_FILE`
- single-cert and multi-cert bundles
- malformed and empty-file errors
- OpenSSL `TRUSTED CERTIFICATE` handling
- CRL tolerance for well-formed CRL sections

The websocket side is covered by the existing `codex-api` / `codex-core`
websocket test suites plus the manual mitmproxy validation above.

---------

Co-authored-by: Ivan Zakharchanka <3axap4eHko@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-03-13 00:59:26 +00:00
easong-openai 5b038135de Add cloud tasks (#3197)
Adds a TUI for managing, applying, and creating cloud tasks
2025-09-30 10:10:33 +00:00