Commit Graph

8634 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeremy Rose
323a5cb7e7 refactor: remove AttachImage tui event (#3191)
TuiEvent is supposed to be purely events that come from the "driver",
i.e. events from the terminal. Everything app-specific should be an
AppEvent. In this case, it didn't need to be an event at all.
2025-09-05 07:02:11 -07:00
Michael Bolin
3f40fbc0a8 chore: improve serialization of ServerNotification (#3193)
This PR introduces introduces a new
`OutgoingMessage::AppServerNotification` variant that is designed to
wrap a `ServerNotification`, which makes the serialization more
straightforward compared to
`OutgoingMessage::Notification(OutgoingNotification)`. We still use the
latter for serializing an `Event` as a `JSONRPCMessage::Notification`,
but I will try to get away from that in the near future.

With this change, now the generated TypeScript type for
`ServerNotification` is:

```typescript
export type ServerNotification =
  | { "method": "authStatusChange", "params": AuthStatusChangeNotification }
  | { "method": "loginChatGptComplete", "params": LoginChatGptCompleteNotification };
```

whereas before it was:

```typescript
export type ServerNotification =
  | { type: "auth_status_change"; data: AuthStatusChangeNotification }
  | { type: "login_chat_gpt_complete"; data: LoginChatGptCompleteNotification };
```

Once the `Event`s are migrated to the `ServerNotification` enum in Rust,
it should be considerably easier to work with notifications on the
TypeScript side, as it will be possible to `switch (message.method)` and
check for exhaustiveness.

Though we will probably need to introduce:

```typescript
export type ServerMessage = ServerRequest | ServerNotification;
```

and then we still need to group all of the `ServerResponse` types
together, as well.
2025-09-04 17:49:50 -07:00
Michael Bolin
b64a2d609a Merge fe1f820162 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-04 17:00:23 -07:00
Michael Bolin
fe1f820162 chore: improve serialization of ServerNotification 2025-09-04 17:00:18 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
742feaf40f tui: fix approval dialog for large commands (#3087)
#### Summary
- Emit a “Proposed Command” history cell when an ExecApprovalRequest
arrives (parity with proposed patches).
- Simplify the approval dialog: show only the reason/instructions; move
the command preview into history.
- Make approval/abort decision history concise:
  - Single line snippet; if multiline, show first line + " ...".
  - Truncate to 80 graphemes with ellipsis for very long commands.

#### Details
- History
- Add `new_proposed_command` to render a header and indented command
preview.
  - Use shared `prefix_lines` helper for first/subsequent line prefixes.
- Approval UI
- `UserApprovalWidget` no longer renders the command in the modal; shows
optional `reason` text only.
  - Decision history renders an inline, dimmed snippet per rules above.
- Tests (snapshot-based)
  - Proposed/decision flow for short command.
  - Proposed multi-line + aborted decision snippet with “ ...”.
  - Very long one-line command -> truncated snippet with “…”.
  - Updated existing exec approval snapshots and test reasons.

<img width="1053" height="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 57
35 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9ed4c316-9daf-4ac1-80ff-7ae1f481dd10"
/>

after approving:

<img width="1053" height="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 58
18 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a44e243f-eb9d-42ea-87f4-171b3fb481e7"
/>

rejection:

<img width="1053" height="207" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 58
45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a022664b-ae0e-4b70-a388-509208707934"
/>

big command:


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dd976e5-799f-4af7-9682-a046e66cc494
2025-09-04 23:54:53 +00:00
Michael Bolin
7169890f5d Merge c6f0420d71 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-04 16:48:40 -07:00
Michael Bolin
c6f0420d71 chore: improve serialization of ServerNotification 2025-09-04 16:48:32 -07:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
907d3dd348 MCP: add session resume + history listing; (#3185)
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements

Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md

If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
2025-09-04 23:44:18 +00:00
pakrym-oai
7df9e9c664 Correctly calculate remaining context size (#3190)
We had multiple issues with context size calculation:
1. `initial_prompt_tokens` calculation based on cache size is not
reliable, cache misses might set it to much higher value. For now
hardcoded to a safer constant.
2. Input context size for GPT-5 is 272k (that's where 33% came from).

Fixes.
2025-09-04 23:34:14 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
b795fbe244 chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.17.0 to 1.18.0 in /codex-rs (#2493)
Bumps [uuid](https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid) from 1.17.0 to 1.18.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/releases">uuid's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.18.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fix up mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes lint by <a
href="https://github.com/KodrAus"><code>@​KodrAus</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/pull/837">uuid-rs/uuid#837</a></li>
<li>Conversions between <code>Timestamp</code> and
<code>std::time::SystemTime</code> by <a
href="https://github.com/dcormier"><code>@​dcormier</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/pull/835">uuid-rs/uuid#835</a></li>
<li>Wrap the error type used in time conversions by <a
href="https://github.com/KodrAus"><code>@​KodrAus</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/pull/838">uuid-rs/uuid#838</a></li>
<li>Prepare for 1.18.0 release by <a
href="https://github.com/KodrAus"><code>@​KodrAus</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/pull/839">uuid-rs/uuid#839</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>New Contributors</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/dcormier"><code>@​dcormier</code></a>
made their first contribution in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/pull/835">uuid-rs/uuid#835</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/compare/v1.17.0...v1.18.0">https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/compare/v1.17.0...v1.18.0</a></p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="60a49eb94f"><code>60a49eb</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/issues/839">#839</a> from
uuid-rs/cargo/v1.18.0</li>
<li><a
href="eb8c697083"><code>eb8c697</code></a>
prepare for 1.18.0 release</li>
<li><a
href="281f26fcd9"><code>281f26f</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/issues/838">#838</a> from
uuid-rs/chore/time-conversion</li>
<li><a
href="2d67ab2b5e"><code>2d67ab2</code></a>
don't use allocated values in errors</li>
<li><a
href="c284ed562f"><code>c284ed5</code></a>
wrap the error type used in time conversions</li>
<li><a
href="87a4359f25"><code>87a4359</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/issues/835">#835</a> from
dcormier/main</li>
<li><a
href="8927396625"><code>8927396</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/issues/837">#837</a> from
uuid-rs/fix/lifetime-syntaxes</li>
<li><a
href="6dfb4b135c"><code>6dfb4b1</code></a>
Conversions between <code>Timestamp</code> and
<code>std::time::SystemTime</code></li>
<li><a
href="b508383aff"><code>b508383</code></a>
fix up mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes lint</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/compare/v1.17.0...v1.18.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=uuid&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=1.17.0&new-version=1.18.0)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)


</details>

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-09-04 16:30:34 -07:00
Dylan
82ed7bd285 [mcp-server] Update read config interface (#3093)
## Summary
Follow-up to #3056

This PR updates the mcp-server interface for reading the config settings
saved by the user. At risk of introducing _another_ Config struct, I
think it makes sense to avoid tying our protocol to ConfigToml, as its
become a bit unwieldy. GetConfigTomlResponse was a de-facto struct for
this already - better to make it explicit, in my opinion.

This is technically a breaking change of the mcp-server protocol, but
given the previous interface was introduced so recently in #2725, and we
have not yet even started to call it, I propose proceeding with the
breaking change - but am open to preserving the old endpoint.

## Testing
- [x] Added additional integration test coverage
2025-09-04 16:26:41 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
1c04e1314d AGENTS.md: clarify test approvals for codex-rs (#3132)
Clarifies codex-rs testing approvals in AGENTS.md:

- Allow running project-specific or individual tests without asking.
- Require asking before running the complete test suite.
- Keep `just fmt` always allowed without approval.
2025-09-04 13:36:12 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
bef7ed0ccc prompt to read AGENTS.md files (#3122) 2025-09-04 13:30:12 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
be23fe1353 Pause status timer while modals are open (#3131)
Summary:
- pause the status timer while waiting on approval modals
- expose deterministic pause/resume helpers to avoid sleep-based tests
- simplify bottom pane timer handling now that the widget owns the clock
2025-09-04 12:37:43 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
2073fa7139 tui: pager pins scroll to bottom (#3167)
when the pager is scrolled to the bottom of the buffer, keep it there.

this should make transcript mode feel a bit more "alive". i've also seen
some confusion about what transcript mode does/doesn't show that i think
has been related to it not pinning scroll.
2025-09-04 11:50:49 -07:00
Anton Panasenko
e60a44cbab [codex] move configuration for reasoning summary format to model family config type (#3171) 2025-09-04 11:00:01 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
075e385969 Use ⌥⇧⌃ glyphs for key hints on mac (#3143)
#### Summary
- render the edit queued message shortcut with the ⌥ modifier on macOS
builds
- add a helper for status indicator snapshot suffixes
- record macOS-specific snapshots for the status indicator widget
2025-09-04 10:55:50 -07:00
Michael Bolin
aa083b795d chore: add rust-lang.rust-analyzer and vadimcn.vscode-lldb to the list of recommended extensions (#3172)
`rust-lang.rust-analyzer` is clearly something all contributors should
install.

`vadimcn.vscode-lldb` is maybe debatable, but I think this is often
better that print-debugging.
2025-09-04 10:47:46 -07:00
Michael Bolin
61f23d30be Merge 64ea038939 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-04 10:44:59 -07:00
Michael Bolin
64ea038939 chore: add rust-lang.rust-analyzer and vadimcn.vscode-lldb to the list of recommended extensions 2025-09-04 10:44:54 -07:00
Michael Bolin
91708bb031 fix: fix serde_as annotation and verify with test (#3170)
I didn't do https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/3163 correctly the
first time: now verified with a test.
2025-09-04 10:38:00 -07:00
Michael Bolin
41fd4e5ed3 Merge cb1e291169 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-04 10:29:17 -07:00
Michael Bolin
cb1e291169 fix: fix serde_as annotation and verify with test 2025-09-04 10:29:11 -07:00
Michael Bolin
09dc3ead9c merge commit for archive created by Sapling 2025-09-04 10:14:47 -07:00
Michael Bolin
ab36fdab75 fix: fix serde_as annotation and verify with test 2025-09-04 10:14:39 -07:00
Anton Panasenko
82dfec5b10 [codex] improve handling of reasoning summary (#3138)
<img width="1474" height="289" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 5 27 19 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6febcdd-fd9c-488c-9e82-348600b1f757"
/>

Fallback to standard behavior when there is no summary in cot, and also
added tests to codify this behavior.
2025-09-04 09:45:14 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
1e82bf9d98 tui: avoid panic when active exec cell area is zero height (#3133)
#### Summary
Avoid a potential panic when rendering the active execution cell when
the allocated area has zero height.

#### Changes
- Guard rendering with `active_cell_area.height > 0` and presence of
`active_exec_cell`.
- Use `saturating_add(1)` for the Y offset to avoid overflow.
- Render via `active_exec_cell.as_ref().unwrap().render_ref(...)` after
the explicit `is_some` check.
2025-09-04 15:51:02 +00:00
Michael Bolin
0a83db5512 fix: use a more efficient wire format for ExecCommandOutputDeltaEvent.chunk (#3163)
When serializing to JSON, the existing solution created an enormous
array of ints, which is far more bytes on the wire than a base64-encoded
string would be.
2025-09-04 08:21:58 -07:00
Michael Bolin
ff86ef67df Merge ac3728faef into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-04 08:15:44 -07:00
Michael Bolin
ac3728faef fix: use a more efficient wire format for ExecCommandOutputDeltaEvent.chunk 2025-09-04 08:15:13 -07:00
Michael Bolin
08aaed9934 Merge 68caf767f4 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-04 08:15:00 -07:00
Michael Bolin
68caf767f4 fix: use a more efficient wire format for ExecCommandOutputDeltaEvent.chunk 2025-09-04 08:14:42 -07:00
Michael Bolin
bd4fa85507 fix: add callback to map before sending request to fix race condition (#3146)
Last week, I thought I found the smoking gun in our flaky integration
tests where holding these locks could have led to potential deadlock:

- https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/2876
- https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/2878

Yet even after those PRs went in, we continued to see flakinees in our
integration tests! Though with the additional logging added as part of
debugging those tests, I now saw things like:

```
read message from stdout: Notification(JSONRPCNotification { jsonrpc: "2.0", method: "codex/event/exec_approval_request", params: Some(Object {"id": String("0"), "msg": Object {"type": String("exec_approval_request"), "call_id": String("call1"), "command": Array [String("python3"), String("-c"), String("print(42)")], "cwd": String("/tmp/.tmpFj2zwi/workdir")}, "conversationId": String("c67b32c5-9475-41bf-8680-f4b4834ebcc6")}) })
notification: Notification(JSONRPCNotification { jsonrpc: "2.0", method: "codex/event/exec_approval_request", params: Some(Object {"id": String("0"), "msg": Object {"type": String("exec_approval_request"), "call_id": String("call1"), "command": Array [String("python3"), String("-c"), String("print(42)")], "cwd": String("/tmp/.tmpFj2zwi/workdir")}, "conversationId": String("c67b32c5-9475-41bf-8680-f4b4834ebcc6")}) })
read message from stdout: Request(JSONRPCRequest { id: Integer(0), jsonrpc: "2.0", method: "execCommandApproval", params: Some(Object {"conversation_id": String("c67b32c5-9475-41bf-8680-f4b4834ebcc6"), "call_id": String("call1"), "command": Array [String("python3"), String("-c"), String("print(42)")], "cwd": String("/tmp/.tmpFj2zwi/workdir")}) })
writing message to stdin: Response(JSONRPCResponse { id: Integer(0), jsonrpc: "2.0", result: Object {"decision": String("approved")} })
in read_stream_until_notification_message(codex/event/task_complete)
[mcp stderr] 2025-09-04T00:00:59.738585Z  INFO codex_mcp_server::message_processor: <- response: JSONRPCResponse { id: Integer(0), jsonrpc: "2.0", result: Object {"decision": String("approved")} }
[mcp stderr] 2025-09-04T00:00:59.738740Z DEBUG codex_core::codex: Submission sub=Submission { id: "1", op: ExecApproval { id: "0", decision: Approved } }
[mcp stderr] 2025-09-04T00:00:59.738832Z  WARN codex_core::codex: No pending approval found for sub_id: 0
```

That is, a response was sent for a request, but no callback was in place
to handle the response!

This time, I think I may have found the underlying issue (though the
fixes for holding locks for too long may have also been part of it),
which is I found cases where we were sending the request:


234c0a0469/codex-rs/core/src/codex.rs (L597)

before inserting the `Sender` into the `pending_approvals` map (which
has to wait on acquiring a mutex):


234c0a0469/codex-rs/core/src/codex.rs (L598-L601)

so it is possible the request could go out and the client could respond
before `pending_approvals` was updated!

Note this was happening in both `request_command_approval()` and
`request_patch_approval()`, which maps to the sorts of errors we have
been seeing when these integration tests have been flaking on us.

While here, I am also adding some extra logging that prints if inserting
into `pending_approvals` overwrites an entry as opposed to purely
inserting one. Today, a conversation can have only one pending request
at a time, but as we are planning to support parallel tool calls, this
invariant may not continue to hold, in which case we need to revisit
this abstraction.
2025-09-04 07:38:28 -07:00
Michael Bolin
d2d6f6658a Merge 1d1ef6f468 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-03 23:52:08 -07:00
Michael Bolin
1d1ef6f468 fix: add callback to map before sending request to fix race condition 2025-09-03 23:52:02 -07:00
Michael Bolin
2fc9264b50 Merge a35fb9d877 into sapling-pr-archive-bolinfest 2025-09-03 23:44:10 -07:00
Michael Bolin
a35fb9d877 fix: add callback to map before sending request to fix race condition 2025-09-03 23:44:02 -07:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
234c0a0469 TUI: Add session resume picker (--resume) and quick resume (--continue) (#3135)
Adds a TUI resume flow with an interactive picker and quick resume.

- CLI: 
  - --resume / -r: open picker to resume a prior session
  - --continue   / -l: resume the most recent session (no picker)
- Behavior on resume: initial history is replayed, welcome banner
hidden, and the first redraw is suppressed to avoid flicker.
- Implementation:
- New tui/src/resume_picker.rs (paginated listing via
RolloutRecorder::list_conversations)
  - App::run accepts ResumeSelection; resumes from disk when requested
- ChatWidget refactor with ChatWidgetInit and new_from_existing; replays
initial messages
- Tests: cover picker sorting/preview extraction and resumed-history
rendering.
- Docs: getting-started updated with flags and picker usage.



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1bb6469b-e5d1-42f6-bec6-b1ae6debda3b
2025-09-04 06:20:40 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
0f4ae1b5b0 chore(deps): bump wiremock from 0.6.4 to 0.6.5 in /codex-rs (#2666)
Bumps [wiremock](https://github.com/LukeMathWalker/wiremock-rs) from
0.6.4 to 0.6.5.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="6b193047bf"><code>6b19304</code></a>
chore: Release wiremock version 0.6.5</li>
<li><a
href="ebaa70b024"><code>ebaa70b</code></a>
feat: Make method and MethodExactMatcher case in-sensitive (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/LukeMathWalker/wiremock-rs/issues/165">#165</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="613b4f9135"><code>613b4f9</code></a>
Make <code>BodyPrintLimit</code> public (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/LukeMathWalker/wiremock-rs/issues/167">#167</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="abfafd2227"><code>abfafd2</code></a>
chore: Upgrade all deps to their latest version (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/LukeMathWalker/wiremock-rs/issues/170">#170</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="60688cfdde"><code>60688cf</code></a>
ci: Upgrade actions. Upgrade dependencies. (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/LukeMathWalker/wiremock-rs/issues/169">#169</a>)</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/LukeMathWalker/wiremock-rs/compare/v0.6.4...v0.6.5">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=wiremock&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=0.6.4&new-version=0.6.5)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)


</details>

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-09-03 23:18:42 -07:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
2b96f9f569 Dividing UserMsgs into categories to send it back to the tui (#3127)
This PR does the following:

- divides user msgs into 3 categories: plain, user instructions, and
environment context
- Centralizes adding user instructions and environment context to a
degree
- Improve the integration testing

Building on top of #3123

Specifically this
[comment](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/3123#discussion_r2319885089).
We need to send the user message while ignoring the User Instructions
and Environment Context we attach.
2025-09-04 05:34:50 +00:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
f2036572b6 Replay EventMsgs from Response Items when resuming a session with history. (#3123)
### Overview

This PR introduces the following changes:
	1.	Adds a unified mechanism to convert ResponseItem into EventMsg.
2. Ensures that when a session is initialized with initial history, a
vector of EventMsg is sent along with the session configuration. This
allows clients to re-render the UI accordingly.
	3. 	Added integration testing

### Caveats

This implementation does not send every EventMsg that was previously
dispatched to clients. The excluded events fall into two categories:
	•	“Arguably” rolled-out events
Examples include tool calls and apply-patch calls. While these events
are conceptually rolled out, we currently only roll out ResponseItems.
These events are already being handled elsewhere and transformed into
EventMsg before being sent.
	•	Non-rolled-out events
Certain events such as TurnDiff, Error, and TokenCount are not rolled
out at all.

### Future Directions

At present, resuming a session involves maintaining two states:
	•	UI State
Clients can replay most of the important UI from the provided EventMsg
history.
	•	Model State
The model receives the complete session history to reconstruct its
internal state.

This design provides a solid foundation. If, in the future, more precise
UI reconstruction is needed, we have two potential paths:
1. Introduce a third data structure that allows us to derive both
ResponseItems and EventMsgs.
2. Clearly divide responsibilities: the core system ensures the
integrity of the model state, while clients are responsible for
reconstructing the UI.
2025-09-04 04:47:00 +00:00
jif-oai
bea64569c1 MCP sandbox call (#3128)
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
2025-09-03 17:05:03 -07:00
pakrym-oai
e83c5f429c Include originator in authentication URL parameters (#3117)
Associates the client with an authentication session.
2025-09-03 16:51:00 -07:00
Dylan
ed0d23d560 [tui] Update /mcp output (#3134)
# Summary
Quick update to clean up MCP output

## Testing
- [x] Ran locally, confirmed output looked good
2025-09-03 23:38:09 +00:00
Jeremy Rose
4ae45a6c8d remove bold the keyword from prompt (#3121)
the model was often including the literal text "Bold the keyword" in
lists.
this guidance doesn't seem particularly useful to me, so just drop it.
2025-09-03 16:00:33 -07:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
6b83c1c3f3 Fix failing CI (#3130)
In this test, the ChatGPT token path is used, and the auth layer tries
to refresh the token if it thinks the token is “old.” Your helper writes
a fixed last_refresh timestamp that has now aged past the 28‑day
threshold, so the code attempts a real refresh against auth.openai.com,
never reaches the mock, and you end up with
received_requests().await.unwrap() being empty.
2025-09-03 22:38:32 +00:00
Dylan
db5276f8e6 chore: Clean up verbosity config (#3056)
## Summary
It appears that #2108 hit a merge conflict with #2355 - I failed to
notice the path difference when re-reviewing the former. This PR
rectifies that, and consolidates it into the protocol package, in line
with our philosophy of specifying types in one place.

## Testing
- [x] Adds config test for model_verbosity
2025-09-03 12:20:31 -07:00
Anton Panasenko
77fb9f3465 [codex] document use_experimental_reasoning_summary toml key config (#3118)
Follow up on https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/3101
2025-09-03 11:16:07 -07:00
Sing303
0e827b6598 Auto-approve DangerFullAccess patches on non-sandboxed platforms (#2988)
**What?**
Auto-approve patches when `SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess` is enabled
on platforms without sandbox support.
Changes in `codex-rs/core/src/safety.rs`: return
`SafetyCheck::AutoApprove { sandbox_type: SandboxType::None }` when no
sandbox is available and DangerFullAccess is set.

**Why?**
On platforms lacking sandbox support, requiring explicit user approval
despite `DangerFullAccess` being explicitly enabled adds friction
without additional safety. This aligns behavior with the stated policy
intent.

**How?**
Extend `assess_patch_safety` match:

* If `get_platform_sandbox()` returns `Some`, keep `AutoApprove {
sandbox_type }`.
* If `None` **and** `SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess`, return
`AutoApprove { SandboxType::None }`.
* Otherwise, fall back to `AskUser`.

**Tests**

* Local checks:
  ```bash
cargo test && cargo clippy --tests && cargo fmt -- --config
imports_granularity=Item
  ```
(Additionally: `just fmt`, `just fix -p codex-core`, `cargo check -p
codex-core`.)

**Docs**
No user-facing CLI changes. No README/help updates needed.

**Risk/Impact**
Reduces prompts on non-sandboxed platforms when DangerFullAccess is
explicitly chosen; consistent with policy semantics.

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <bolinfest@gmail.com>
2025-09-03 10:57:47 -07:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
daaadfb260 Introduce Rollout Policy (#3116)
Have a helper function for deciding if we are rolling out a function or
not
2025-09-03 17:37:07 +00:00