## Summary
- add `ProcessOwnedCodeModeSessionProvider` and logical session
generation/rebinding state
- add the supervised child-process connection, reader/writer tasks, and
driver state machine
- make dropped execute/wait/open callers cancellation-safe with explicit
ownership handoff and durable cleanup
- validate cell/delegate lifecycle state and reject invalid protocol
transitions
- add end-to-end stdio coverage for delegates, cancellation, frame
limits, child loss, stale generations, replacement, and long-lived
sessions
## Why
This final stage exposes the process-owned client only after the wire
protocol, host-safe runtime, and standalone host are independently in
place. Transport failure is fail-stop: the client closes local state,
cancels callbacks, reaps the child, and lazily rebuilds a fresh host
generation rather than transactionally recovering the old connection.
## Stack
This is **4 of 4** in the process-owned code-mode session stack.
- Depends on #30111
- Full stack: #30108 → #30110 → #30111 → this PR
## Validation
- `just test -p codex-code-mode -p codex-code-mode-host` — 86 passed
- `just fix -p codex-code-mode`
- `just fix -p codex-code-mode-host`
- `just bazel-lock-update`
- `just bazel-lock-check`
- `bazel test //codex-rs/code-mode:code-mode-unit-tests
//codex-rs/code-mode-host:code-mode-host-unit-tests
//codex-rs/code-mode-host:code-mode-host-stdio-test
//codex-rs/code-mode-protocol:code-mode-protocol-unit-tests` — 4/4
passed
- `just fmt`
## Why
A process host should be discarded and rebuilt after critical actor or
V8 failure, while the existing in-process production path must keep its
current cell-error semantics. This change establishes that failure
boundary without adding the host process or remote client.
## What changed
- add optional task-failure supervision to the transport-neutral
code-mode session runtime
- report Tokio cell-actor failures and V8 runtime-thread panics to a
host-provided fail-stop handler
- preserve the existing handler-less in-process behavior
- make host-owned cell ID allocation fail before numeric wraparound
## Follow-up
The V8 panic signal surfaced here should also be consumed by the
`InProcessCodeModeSession` manager in a future change so it can fail the
affected cell. This PR intentionally leaves the handler-less in-process
behavior unchanged while putting the required panic tracking in place.
## Stack
This is **2 of 4** in the process-owned code-mode session stack.
- #30108 is merged into `main`
- The next PR targets this branch
## Validation
- `just test -p codex-code-mode` — 53 passed
- `just argument-comment-lint -p codex-code-mode`
- `just fix -p codex-code-mode`
Mechanical rename of CodeModeService => InProcessCodeModeSession
This already implements a CodeModeSession as its prime interface to
Core. The name was vestigial _and_ confusing af when embedded inside
core::tools::code_mode::CodeModeService
## Summary
- introduce a private `session_runtime` boundary for cell creation
requests, observation modes, lifecycle events, output items, and tool
metadata
- update the cell actor and in-process service to use those
transport-neutral types
- keep cell ID allocation on the owning session side
## Motivation
Cell lifecycle vocabulary currently lives inside the cell actor
implementation. That makes the service adapter and future session
runtime depend on actor-specific types, increasing the size and
complexity of the runtime ownership change.
This is the first reviewable slice of the session-runtime stack. It
separates the transport-neutral data model without moving lifecycle
ownership or changing behavior.
Later slices will move session state behind this boundary, harden
terminal and shutdown behavior, and split cell creation from
observation.
## Behavior
There are no public API or user-visible behavior changes in this PR.
In particular:
- `CodeModeSession::execute` and `wait` are unchanged
- cell IDs remain allocated by the owning session
- cell admission, observation, termination, and shutdown behavior are
unchanged
A code-mode cell is a single JavaScript execution that can produce
output, call tools, wait for asynchronous work, resume, or be
terminated. This PR extracts the existing per-cell run loop into a
dedicated actor that owns the cell’s lifecycle state. It is primarily an
ownership change rather than a new lifecycle contract: existing behavior
now has one clear implementation boundary.
### Architecture
The session service remains responsible for session-wide concerns:
allocating cell IDs, storing shared values, creating cells, and routing
requests to them.
Once a cell is created, its execution state belongs to its actor.
Callers interact with the actor through a handle. The actor receives two
kinds of input: runtime events and control requests.
A single event loop serializes these inputs and applies the lifecycle
rules. It tracks the current observer—the caller waiting for an
update—along with accumulated output, outstanding callbacks, runtime
state, yield deadlines, and termination progress. Observation,
termination, completion, and cleanup therefore have one consistent
owner.
When the runtime has no immediately runnable work and is waiting only on
timers or tool results, the actor can return accumulated output and
information about outstanding tool calls while keeping the cell
available to resume. On completion or termination, it performs the
appropriate callback cleanup before publishing the final result and
removing the cell from the session.
A small host interface connects the actor to session-owned facilities
such as tool dispatch, notifications, stored values, and final cell
removal, keeping those responsibilities outside the actor itself.
### Why
Previously, cell lifecycle state and coordination lived alongside
session management. The actor boundary makes each cell a self-contained
state machine with a single writer, while the service becomes a registry
and adapter around it.
This makes lifecycle behavior easier to reason about and test in
isolation. It also establishes a clean boundary for later changing where
cells run or how they communicate without recreating their lifecycle
rules.
This is phase 1 of a 4 phase stack:
1. **Add protocol and host crates for new IPC code mode implementation**
2. Create the new standalone binary
3. Create a new IPC `CodeModeSessionProvider` to use new binary
4. Remove v8 from core and only use IPC provider
## Add protocol and host crates for new IPC code mode implementation
Establish a clean process boundary without changing the existing
in-process behavior.
- Add the codex-code-mode-protocol crate for shared session, runtime,
response, and tool-definition types.
- Move protocol-facing code out of the V8-backed implementation.
- Add a buildable codex-code-mode-host crate as the foundation for the
standalone process.
- Keep the existing in-process runtime as the active implementation.
## Summary
Introduce a `CodeModeSession` interface for executing and managing
code-mode cells.
This moves cell lifecycle, callback delegation, termination, and
shutdown behind a session abstraction, while continuing to use the
existing in-process implementation, and the ability to implement an
external process one behind this interface.
A Codex session owns one `CodeModeSession`, which in turn owns its
running cells and stored code-mode state. Each cell is represented to
the caller as a `StartedCell`, exposing its cell ID and initial
response.
It also introduces a `CodeModeSessionDelegate` callback interface. A
session uses the delegate to invoke nested host tools and emit
notifications while a cell is running, allowing the runtime to
communicate with its owning Codex session without depending directly on
core turn handling.
<img width="2121" height="1001" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c349a819-2a59-485c-bda4-2caf68ac4c31"
/>
Introduce execute_to_pending and wait_to_pending APIs that freeze
pending-mode runtimes until an explicit resume, while preserving the
existing continuously-running execute path. Add runtime and service
coverage for pending, resume, completion, and freeze behavior.
## Summary
Extends rollout tracing across tool dispatch and code-mode runtime
boundaries. This records canonical tool-call lifecycle events and links
code-mode execution/wait operations back to the model-visible calls that
caused them.
## Stack
This is PR 3/5 in the rollout trace stack.
- [#18876](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18876): Add rollout
trace crate
- [#18877](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18877): Record core
session rollout traces
- [#18878](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18878): Trace tool and
code-mode boundaries
- [#18879](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18879): Trace sessions
and multi-agent edges
- [#18880](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18880): Add debug trace
reduction command
## Review Notes
This PR is about attribution. Reviewers should focus on whether direct
tool calls, code-mode-originated tool calls, waits, outputs, and
cancellation boundaries are recorded with enough source information for
deterministic reduction without coupling the reducer to live runtime
internals.
The stack remains valid after this layer: tool and code-mode traces
reduce through the existing crate model, while the broader session and
multi-agent relationships are added in the next PR.
Moves Code Mode to a new crate with no dependencies on codex. This
create encodes the code mode semantics that we want for lifetime,
mounting, tool calling.
The model-facing surface is mostly unchanged. `exec` still runs raw
JavaScript, `wait` still resumes or terminates a `cell_id`, nested tools
are still available through `tools.*`, and helpers like `text`, `image`,
`store`, `load`, `notify`, `yield_control`, and `exit` still exist.
The major change is underneath that surface:
- Old code mode was an external Node runtime.
- New code mode is an in-process V8 runtime embedded directly in Rust.
- Old code mode managed cells inside a long-lived Node runner process.
- New code mode manages cells in Rust, with one V8 runtime thread per
active `exec`.
- Old code mode used JSON protocol messages over child stdin/stdout plus
Node worker-thread messages.
- New code mode uses Rust channels and direct V8 callbacks/events.
This PR also fixes the two migration regressions that fell out of that
substrate change:
- `wait { terminate: true }` now waits for the V8 runtime to actually
stop before reporting termination.
- synchronous top-level `exit()` now succeeds again instead of surfacing
as a script error.
---
- `core/src/tools/code_mode/*` is now mostly an adapter layer for the
public `exec` / `wait` tools.
- `code-mode/src/service.rs` owns cell sessions and async control flow
in Rust.
- `code-mode/src/runtime/*.rs` owns the embedded V8 isolate and
JavaScript execution.
- each `exec` spawns a dedicated runtime thread plus a Rust
session-control task.
- helper globals are installed directly into the V8 context instead of
being injected through a source prelude.
- helper modules like `tools.js` and `@openai/code_mode` are synthesized
through V8 module resolution callbacks in Rust.
---
Also added a benchmark for showing the speed of init and use of a code
mode env:
```
$ cargo bench -p codex-code-mode --bench exec_overhead -- --samples 30 --warm-iterations 25 --tool-counts 0,32,128
Finished [`bench` profile [optimized]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/profiles.html#default-profiles) target(s) in 0.18s
Running benches/exec_overhead.rs (target/release/deps/exec_overhead-008c440d800545ae)
exec_overhead: samples=30, warm_iterations=25, tool_counts=[0, 32, 128]
scenario tools samples warmups iters mean/exec p95/exec rssΔ p50 rssΔ max
cold_exec 0 30 0 1 1.13ms 1.20ms 8.05MiB 8.06MiB
warm_exec 0 30 1 25 473.43us 512.49us 912.00KiB 1.33MiB
cold_exec 32 30 0 1 1.03ms 1.15ms 8.08MiB 8.11MiB
warm_exec 32 30 1 25 509.73us 545.76us 960.00KiB 1.30MiB
cold_exec 128 30 0 1 1.14ms 1.19ms 8.30MiB 8.34MiB
warm_exec 128 30 1 25 575.08us 591.03us 736.00KiB 864.00KiB
memory uses a fresh-process max RSS delta for each scenario
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
