## Summary
Change code-mode stored value updates to merge writes by key instead of
replacing the session's complete stored-value map after each cell
completes.
Previously, each cell received a snapshot of stored values and returned
the complete resulting map. When multiple cells ran concurrently, a
later completion could overwrite values written by another cell because
it committed an older snapshot.
This change moves stored-value ownership into `CodeModeService`:
- Each runtime starts from the service's current stored values.
- Runtime completion reports only keys written by that cell.
- The service merges those writes into the current stored-value map on
successful completion.
- Core no longer replaces its stored-value state from a cell result.
As a result, concurrently executing cells can update different stored
keys without clobbering one another.
The move into CodeModeService is motivated by a desire to have this
lifetime tied to a new lifetime object on that side in a subsequent PR.
Moves Code Mode to a new crate with no dependencies on codex. This
create encodes the code mode semantics that we want for lifetime,
mounting, tool calling.
The model-facing surface is mostly unchanged. `exec` still runs raw
JavaScript, `wait` still resumes or terminates a `cell_id`, nested tools
are still available through `tools.*`, and helpers like `text`, `image`,
`store`, `load`, `notify`, `yield_control`, and `exit` still exist.
The major change is underneath that surface:
- Old code mode was an external Node runtime.
- New code mode is an in-process V8 runtime embedded directly in Rust.
- Old code mode managed cells inside a long-lived Node runner process.
- New code mode manages cells in Rust, with one V8 runtime thread per
active `exec`.
- Old code mode used JSON protocol messages over child stdin/stdout plus
Node worker-thread messages.
- New code mode uses Rust channels and direct V8 callbacks/events.
This PR also fixes the two migration regressions that fell out of that
substrate change:
- `wait { terminate: true }` now waits for the V8 runtime to actually
stop before reporting termination.
- synchronous top-level `exit()` now succeeds again instead of surfacing
as a script error.
---
- `core/src/tools/code_mode/*` is now mostly an adapter layer for the
public `exec` / `wait` tools.
- `code-mode/src/service.rs` owns cell sessions and async control flow
in Rust.
- `code-mode/src/runtime/*.rs` owns the embedded V8 isolate and
JavaScript execution.
- each `exec` spawns a dedicated runtime thread plus a Rust
session-control task.
- helper globals are installed directly into the V8 context instead of
being injected through a source prelude.
- helper modules like `tools.js` and `@openai/code_mode` are synthesized
through V8 module resolution callbacks in Rust.
---
Also added a benchmark for showing the speed of init and use of a code
mode env:
```
$ cargo bench -p codex-code-mode --bench exec_overhead -- --samples 30 --warm-iterations 25 --tool-counts 0,32,128
Finished [`bench` profile [optimized]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/profiles.html#default-profiles) target(s) in 0.18s
Running benches/exec_overhead.rs (target/release/deps/exec_overhead-008c440d800545ae)
exec_overhead: samples=30, warm_iterations=25, tool_counts=[0, 32, 128]
scenario tools samples warmups iters mean/exec p95/exec rssΔ p50 rssΔ max
cold_exec 0 30 0 1 1.13ms 1.20ms 8.05MiB 8.06MiB
warm_exec 0 30 1 25 473.43us 512.49us 912.00KiB 1.33MiB
cold_exec 32 30 0 1 1.03ms 1.15ms 8.08MiB 8.11MiB
warm_exec 32 30 1 25 509.73us 545.76us 960.00KiB 1.30MiB
cold_exec 128 30 0 1 1.14ms 1.19ms 8.30MiB 8.34MiB
warm_exec 128 30 1 25 575.08us 591.03us 736.00KiB 864.00KiB
memory uses a fresh-process max RSS delta for each scenario
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
