The docs described a reactive executor: every entry point was a human label, and
the only issue tireless ever created was a plan child. Nothing surveyed a repo or
proposed work, which is the half that makes this continuous rather than
on-demand.
Add JobKind::Discover, routed always to Claude Code (proposing work is the
highest-judgement, lowest-volume task), the tireless/discover and
tireless/proposed labels, and prompt/discover.cc.md as a fourth member of the
versioned prompt set. The contract version does not move: the plan structure is
unchanged, and bumping for less than a shape change trains people to bump
reflexively.
With discovery comes the question of where the loop closes, which was previously
unspecified — routing inferred that plan children are auto-admitted, but nothing
said so. State it as a rule and enforce it:
Admission is inherited, never invented.
may_opt_in() lets tireless label a plan child, because a human admitted its
parent, and refuses to label a discovered issue, because nothing has been
admitted. It is a function rather than a config flag on purpose: the failure it
prevents is unbounded, not merely wrong, so relaxing it should require review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013TxK1CWPkFXqdcXMJ4hVe6
581e6ae738
