opened MINUS closed per direction, plotted against the caps. Occupancy
is the measurement that matters and cumulative opens actively mislead:
inbound churns constantly (170 opened, 156 closed) while outbound is
deliberately maintained (36 opened, 27 closed), so a high inbound open
count says nothing about whether its cap is full. Reading the ratio of
cumulative opens is how issue #1 came to recommend the wrong knob.
Measured now: outbound 9 held against a cap of 8 -- saturated -- while
inbound sits at 14 of 32 and the node has discovered 300 peers. So
--out-peers binds and --in-peers does not, the reverse of what #1 said.
No exporter change needed; both series are already scraped from the
node. Adds the discovered-peers count and rounds-per-minute alongside,
since those are the other two the experiment compares.
Rob Thijssen
d784db8e3a
