grenadeandClaude Opus 5
bfd3470840
A name now appears as soon as one node leads the vote, rather than waiting for three. On a chain that resolves a first reporter for about one block in seven, the old bar left almost every miner permanently anonymous — and since a later block can overturn a mapping, a guess that corrects itself is more useful than a blank that never fills in. What is refused is a dead heat. Choosing between two equally-voted nodes would be a coin toss wearing a telemetry badge, which is a different thing from a thin but real lead. The honesty moves to the presentation instead of being dropped. A percentage alone cannot separate "100% of 1" from "86% of 7", so `Attribution` and `LeaderboardRow` now carry the number of votes behind the name. The leaderboard marks a mapping resting on a single block or a narrow lead with `node?` and a dashed chip, and the tooltip states both figures and that a later block can correct it. Dashed rather than a second colour: the accent hue is reserved for identity and alarm, and this is neither — the same claim held more loosely. The footer now says node names are inferred from which node reported a block to telemetry first, never something the miner asserted, and that the reward preimage beside them is the only identity the chain itself vouches for. `a_single_lucky_vote_still_names_nobody` asserted the old policy and is replaced by `one_vote_names_but_says_it_is_only_one`, which pins the new contract: it names, and it reports `votes == 1` so the UI can mark it. A new `a_dead_heat_names_nobody` keeps the case that is still refused. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jp6a8EDar9ueEhAxzep4V5